All Posts

Sorted by Magic (New & Upvoted)

Wednesday, January 22nd 2020
Wed, Jan 22nd 2020

Shortform [Beta]
5Ramiro5d Shouldn't we have more EA editors in Philpapers categories? Philpapers [https://philpapers.org/]is this huge index/community of academic philosophers and texts. It's a good place to start researching a topic. Part of the work is done by voluntary editors and assistants, who assume the responsibility of categorizing and including relevant bibliography; in exchange, they are constantly in touch with the corresponding subject. Some EAs are responsible for their corresponding fields; however, I noticed that some relevant EA-related categories currently have no editor (e.g.: Impact of Artificial Intelligence). I wonder: wouldn't it be useful if EAs assumed thses positions?

Tuesday, January 21st 2020
Tue, Jan 21st 2020

Shortform [Beta]
11Khorton6d Who should pay the cost of Googling studies on the EA Forum? 1. Many EA Forum posts have minimal engagement with relevant academic literature 2. If you see a Forum post that doesn't engage with literature you think is relevant, you could make a claim without looking up a citation based on your memory, but there's a reasonable chance you'll be wrong. 3. Many people say they'd rather see an imperfect post or comment than not have it at all. 4. But people tend to remember an original claim, even if it's later debunked. 5. Maybe the best option is to phrase my comment as a question: "Have you looked at the literature on X?"

Load More Days