Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
Comment Permalink
Arepo2
0
0

Cool! I just submitted a project - minor bit of feedback is that it's slightly irritating to have the 'project subtitle' field be mandatory.

Reply
Jeroen De Ryck 🔹1
0
0

Thanks for the feedback and submitting a project! I'll make that field non-mandatory when I'm doing some updates :)

Reply
See in context
by Jeroen De Ryck 🔹
2 min read 10

83

Opportunities to take actionCommunity projectsResearch agendas, questions, and project listsAnnouncements and updates
Frontpage

What and why?

You probably have a folder or document somewhere on your PC with a bunch of abandoned projects or project ideas that never ended up seeing the light of day. You might have developed a grand vision for this project and imagined how it can save or improve so many people's lives.

Yet those ideas never materialized due to a lack of time, money, skills, network or the energy to push through. But you might have spent considerable resources on getting this project started and whilst it might not be worthwhile to continue to pursue this project, it seems like a waste to throw it all away.

Introducing Unfinished Impact: a website where you can share your potentially impactful abandoned projects for other people to take over. This way, the impact of your project can still be achieved and the resources you've spent on it do not go to waste.

How?

You can share a project simply by clicking the corresponding button on the home page. I recommend sharing as much relevant information as possible whilst submitting your project. You leave some form of contact information as you're submitting your project. People can then contact you if they want to take over your project. Whether or not you transfer the project to the interested person is up to you to decide. After submission, the project needs to be approved before it's shown publicly.

 

Submit your project

 

Suggestions to find someone to take over your project

You're thinking about sharing your project and you want it out of the way quickly, but you also want it to succeed. Here are some things you can do that might help your project find someone to take it over:

  • Give a clear and concise theory of change, and include references where you have them. Make sure no logical steps are missing. Also indicate gaps that you haven't been able to fill yourself, if they exist.
  • Describe what your goal and method are. The person taking over the project needs to understand the idea you have in your head well and why you want to do it that way.
  • Describe what you have already done for the project and what you think still needs to be done to have an MVP.
  • Explain why you are sharing the project. It might be because you lacked a certain skill or knowledge or were stuck on a problem you couldn't solve. Explain in detail what the problem was, so someone who's reading your project knows what skills they should have.

But I will finish this project someday! It's not abandoned, just archived!

Will you, tho? Have you made a plan and have you dedicated time to it in the near future? Did you work on it in the last year? If the answer to these questions is "no", then you most likely won't finish this project someday, and you might as well share it.

 

Submit your project

 

If you're interested in getting these projects regularly in your mailbox, you can sign up for a future newsletter here.

Feedback? Comment below!

Thanks to @Bob Jacobs  for the valuable feedback on the website and this post

83

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments10


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Will Howard🔹7
3
0

This is a great idea, I just submitted a project. I also wrote it up as a post, but your post was what prompted me to write it :)

Something I tend to find with projects like this[1] is that they can be forgotten about after the initial launch because they're not a destination site so there is no way for people to naturally come back to them. Have you thought about doing a newsletter or similar with an update on the projects that are added? I think it could be fairly infrequent (monthly) and automated and still be quite useful.

Also some minor feedback: submitting didn't work initially because of some problem with the description field. I removed a url and some line breaks and then it worked.

  1. ^

    i.e. the UnfinishedImpact project, not my idea

Reply
Jeroen De Ryck 🔹2
0
0

Thanks for the comment. I agree with your criticism. It would be nice to have a newsletter similar to how the EA Opportunities Board newsletter works. I decided against that for a few reasons:

  • The newsletter should indeed be automated, but this increases complexity and initial time investment. This is a time investment I'm currently not able to make.
  • There needs to be a steady flow of project submissions before such a newsletter makes sense. I found it really hard to guess this, as we tend to only see successful projects posted. Maybe everyone has a folder with 10 abandoned projects and adds new ones every other month, maybe I'm the only one. I'll maybe re-evaluate this after a month when I'll have some more time to work on this.
Reply
Will Howard🔹8
2
0
1

Very reasonable, I think the project is great as is. I just have one more newsletter-related suggestion:

It's a lot cheaper to collect emails than it is to do the rest of the work related to sending out automated updates, so it could be worth doing that to take advantage of the initial spike in interest (without making any promises as to whether there will be updates). This could just be a link to a google form on the website if you wanted it to be really simple to implement.

Reply
Jeroen De Ryck 🔹2
0
0
1

Good point. I'm going to do that right away! Edit: You can sign up here.

Reply
Arepo2
0
0

Cool! I just submitted a project - minor bit of feedback is that it's slightly irritating to have the 'project subtitle' field be mandatory.

Reply
Jeroen De Ryck 🔹1
0
0

Thanks for the feedback and submitting a project! I'll make that field non-mandatory when I'm doing some updates :)

Reply
NickLaing2
0
0

Love this idea! Even putting it up there might make the person who came up with the idea marginally more likely to do it or at least be involved with doing it too.

Reply
Chris Leong2
0
0
1

Amazing idea!

Reply
ezrah1
0
0

Where can I see the projects that were submitted?

Reply
More from Jeroen De Ryck 🔹
90
Announcement: We’re launching Effectief Geven
3 authors
· · 4m read
6
6
81
Effective Altruism and the strategic ambiguity of ‘doing good’
Jeroen De Ryck 🔹
· · 2m read
10
10
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 23m read
 · 
Or on the types of prioritization, their strengths, pitfalls, and how EA should balance them   The cause prioritization landscape in EA is changing. Prominent groups have shut down, others have been founded, and everyone is trying to figure out how to prepare for AI. This is the first in a series of posts examining the state of cause prioritization and proposing strategies for moving forward.   Executive Summary * Performing prioritization work has been one of the main tasks, and arguably achievements, of EA. * We highlight three types of prioritization: Cause Prioritization, Within-Cause (Intervention) Prioritization, and Cross-Cause (Intervention) Prioritization. * We ask how much of EA prioritization work falls in each of these categories: * Our estimates suggest that, for the organizations we investigated, the current split is 89% within-cause work, 2% cross-cause, and 9% cause prioritization. * We then explore strengths and potential pitfalls of each level: * Cause prioritization offers a big-picture view for identifying pressing problems but can fail to capture the practical nuances that often determine real-world success. * Within-cause prioritization focuses on a narrower set of interventions with deeper more specialised analysis but risks missing higher-impact alternatives elsewhere. * Cross-cause prioritization broadens the scope to find synergies and the potential for greater impact, yet demands complex assumptions and compromises on measurement. * See the Summary Table below to view the considerations. * We encourage reflection and future work on what the best ways of prioritizing are and how EA should allocate resources between the three types. * With this in mind, we outline eight cruxes that sketch what factors could favor some types over others. * We also suggest some potential next steps aimed at refining our approach to prioritization by exploring variance, value of information, tractability, and the
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
[Cross-posted from my Substack here] If you spend time with people trying to change the world, you’ll come to an interesting conundrum: Various advocacy groups reference previous successful social movements as to why their chosen strategy is the most important one. Yet, these groups often follow wildly different strategies from each other to achieve social change. So, which one of them is right? The answer is all of them and none of them. This is because many people use research and historical movements to justify their pre-existing beliefs about how social change happens. Simply, you can find a case study to fit most plausible theories of how social change happens. For example, the groups might say: * Repeated nonviolent disruption is the key to social change, citing the Freedom Riders from the civil rights Movement or Act Up! from the gay rights movement. * Technological progress is what drives improvements in the human condition if you consider the development of the contraceptive pill funded by Katharine McCormick. * Organising and base-building is how change happens, as inspired by Ella Baker, the NAACP or Cesar Chavez from the United Workers Movement. * Insider advocacy is the real secret of social movements – look no further than how influential the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights was in passing the Civil Rights Acts of 1960 & 1964. * Democratic participation is the backbone of social change – just look at how Ireland lifted a ban on abortion via a Citizen’s Assembly. * And so on… To paint this picture, we can see this in action below: Source: Just Stop Oil which focuses on…civil resistance and disruption Source: The Civic Power Fund which focuses on… local organising What do we take away from all this? In my mind, a few key things: 1. Many different approaches have worked in changing the world so we should be humble and not assume we are doing The Most Important Thing 2. The case studies we focus on are likely confirmation bias, where
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
I wanted to share a small but important challenge I've encountered as a student engaging with Effective Altruism from a lower-income country (Nigeria), and invite thoughts or suggestions from the community. Recently, I tried to make a one-time donation to one of the EA-aligned charities listed on the Giving What We Can platform. However, I discovered that I could not donate an amount less than $5. While this might seem like a minor limit for many, for someone like me — a student without a steady income or job, $5 is a significant amount. To provide some context: According to Numbeo, the average monthly income of a Nigerian worker is around $130–$150, and students often rely on even less — sometimes just $20–$50 per month for all expenses. For many students here, having $5 "lying around" isn't common at all; it could represent a week's worth of meals or transportation. I personally want to make small, one-time donations whenever I can, rather than commit to a recurring pledge like the 10% Giving What We Can pledge, which isn't feasible for me right now. I also want to encourage members of my local EA group, who are in similar financial situations, to practice giving through small but meaningful donations. In light of this, I would like to: * Recommend that Giving What We Can (and similar platforms) consider allowing smaller minimum donation amounts to make giving more accessible to students and people in lower-income countries. * Suggest that more organizations be added to the platform, to give donors a wider range of causes they can support with their small contributions. Uncertainties: * Are there alternative platforms or methods that allow very small one-time donations to EA-aligned charities? * Is there a reason behind the $5 minimum that I'm unaware of, and could it be adjusted to be more inclusive? I strongly believe that cultivating a habit of giving, even with small amounts, helps build a long-term culture of altruism — and it would
Relevant opportunities
3
Applications Open: AI Safety India Phase 1 – Fundamentals of Safe AI (Global Cohort)
adityaraj@eanita
· · 2m read
0
0
3
We are looking for: Expert in Humanitarian Impact Assessment, EA-Aligned
Teresa Jakovlev
· · 1m read
0
0
65
World Malaria Day 2025: what's new, what's not
Toby Tremlett🔹
· · 2m read
2
2
View more