Impact investing
Hillebrandt, Hauke & John Halstead (2018) Impact Investing Report, Founder'sFounders Pledge.
Hillebrandt, Hauke & John Halstead (2018) [ImpactImpact Investing Report] https://founderspledge.com/research/fp-impact-investingReport, Founder's Pledge
Hillebrandt, Hauke & John Halstead (2018) [Impact Investing Report] (https://founderspledge.com/research/fp-impact-investing) Founder's Pledge
Hillebrandt, Hauke & John Halstead (2018) [Impact Investing Report] (https://founderspledge.com/research/fp-impact-investing) Founder's Pledge
For impact investing to do good, it has to provide a company with more capital than it would have otherwise received. This is often difficult unless the investment is concessionary (sacrifices some level of financial return against the market rate), or takes place in a private market which other investors are unable or unwilling to invest in (Brest & Born 2015)2013).
Further readingBibliography
Brest, Paul & Kelly Born. 2015.Born (2013) When can impact investing create real impact?, Stanford social innovation review.Social Innovation Review, vol. 11, pp. 22–31.
Lays out the conditions under which impact investing can make a difference.
Karnofsky, Holden. 2009.Holden (2009) Acumen Fund and social enterprise investment.investment, GiveWell, November 25.
GiveWell’s shallow investigation into impact investing.
For impact investing to do good, it has to provide a company with more capital than it would have otherwise received. This is often difficult unless the investment is concessionary (sacrifices some level of financial return against the market rate), or takes place in a private market which other investors are unable or unwilling to invest
in (Brest & Born 2013).in.[1]BibliographyFurther readingBrest, Paul & Kelly Born (2013)When can impact investing create real impact?,Stanford Social Innovation Review, vol. 11, pp. 22–31.Lays out the conditions under which impact investing can make a difference.Brest, Paul & Kelly Born (2013) When can impact investing create real impact?, Stanford Social Innovation Review, vol. 11, pp. 22–31.