All of John_Salvatier's Comments + Replies

Good framing! This problem extends not just to organizations and such, but also to people's  individual intellectual processes (and really all areas of life).  Like people naturally avoid "consider the opposite" type tools in their thinking. And even when it would be very revealing, people avoid thinking from other people's perspectives.

I also think its easy to be too negative on this kind of avoidance. At a fundamental level its there for a good reason (too much feedback is overwhelming),  its important  to be able to be OK that you are in fact avoiding some kinds of feedback so that you can grow what you do accept.

But obviously pointing out feedback avoidance is good.

What does the beginning of your pitch sound like?

0
weeatquince
9y
If it helps a good start for me is "So effective altruism is really awesome, basically it means applying evidence and reason and the scientific method and so on to the goal of doing good in the world. Makes sense right? So a really simple example of this is doing research to assess charities to . . ."
0
Ben Kuhn
9y
You reminded me that I actually already wrote this up on my blog. I've linked to it from the parent comment as well.

minor: this would look more professional if you changed the font to match the normal font. Its different here and looks weird.

1
RyanCarey
9y
Yep, a blessing and curse of the LessWrong and EA Forum article software is that it gives you a lot of freedom to edit html formatting and preserves the formatting of pasted text: How to make your article have consistent formatting

A counter force is that at least some of those people would have found EA anyway or found GiveWell and donated to effective charities.

However, for lots of people (for example, me) the in person connection is going to make them a lot more excited than just finding out about the movement in the abstract. In my case, that's made me donate substantially more than I would otherwise.

6
AGB
9y
One person I introduced to the EA London group framed this as 'it's not that I wouldn't have found this and been interested in it anyway, eventually, but you probably sped up that process by 6 months to a year'. That doesn't strike me as a crazy estimate, and such reasoning leads to similar practical conclusions I think.
3
jonathancourtney
9y
Agreed- part of valuing the pledge at $20,000US (rather than the $150,000US that the median earner would donate over their life time) is an attempt to capture this sort of counter-factual concern. I also totally agree about your point about personal connections- I think many people find that they do a lot to motivate them to do more for EA- just another way that chapters are awesome!

I'm not sure if I'm donating to AMF this year, but we're hosting a Donation Decision Day in Seattle on December 28th, and there will probably be people there donating. Who should I contact if we have people that are donating to AMF?

0
Tom_Ash
9y
Joey or me.

Clean up and look good

This is one of the big benefits I've found from learning to dress well. People generally seem much more positively disposed to the weird ideas I talk about now that I dress well and have good social skills. People interpret weird ideas from high status people much more favorably than they do from less high status people.

I think the lesson here is that its useful to spend time learning to dress well, develop social skills and otherwise become high status. I have some advice on learning how to dress well (mostly for men).

1[anonymous]9y
Firstly, I think this is entirely contextual: certainly in academia, as in many other typically formal environments, one can only dress casually with a certain prior status. Those who dress-down are those who don't need to impress, and thus openly signal that fact. Secondly, in many dissenting subcultures, how one dresses is an important part of that identity, i.e. for an EA to dress and behave modestly is to advertise, and indeed, help enact, ones charitable duties. Thirdly, self-objectification is pretty inhuman to most peoples sensibilities, and especially in the case of women, a pretty negative social pressure. It's also, obviously, extremely conservative ('look and behave like everyone else!' - 'sexually instrumentalise yourself to get more money!'). I'm certainly not saying one should flatly disregard their appearance, just that it contextually holds, often in dissenting subcultures, and can be rather problematic.
0
Peter Wildeford
9y
Thanks for the style guide!

I plan EA meetups and attended the EA summit and give about 20% of my income. I haven't taken the pledge, but was thinking about it, and my guess is I will take it anyway. I would be more likely to take it and take it faster if you made the change.

I wonder if you've had a a poet look at the pledge. It would be nice if it also sounded poetic. For example, you might replace "a significant amount of good" with "much good", and I'm sure with more wordsmithing, you could develop real beauty.

Seattle Effective Altruists recent meetups:

  • Dinner with Nick Bostrom
  • Criticisms of EA discussion
  • Existential risk discussion

Future meetups:

  • Factory Farming documentary night (Earthling and Farm To Fridge)
  • Style for Effective Altruists
  • Short talk from Giving What We Can on the pledge

Myself:

I'm John, and I help organize the Seattle EA meetup group! I also think Bayesian statistics is the bees knees. I find it pretty fun to help EAs improve their fashion skills. Also, I love to dance to electronic dance music.

0
RyanCarey
10y
Hey John, yes I agree that Bayesian statistics is great, especially philosophically. Good luck developing your Seattle group, and growing a band of EAs to run it!
0
Tom_Ash
10y
Hi John! Any EDM recommendations? I sometimes find these mixes energising to listen to while working - they help me blitz through spreadsheets (and Science suggests they don't hurt for this sort of task).