All of Luke Eure's Comments + Replies

Hi Bella,

Thanks a lot for the feedback. Updated the form so people can give qualitative feedback there. Will make the google sheet clearer, and see if I can make the title and copy more compelling. Appreciate it!

I found that ACE estimates that the Humane League an estimate of between -6 and 13 farmed animals spared per dollar donated. If anyone has other sources or perspectives to share on this, I'd greatly appreciate it.

Echoing themes of what some other people have said, I think it's important to have space in your life where you are not always optimizing for effectiveness. You were on vacation! Choosing to use some of your vacation time and a significant chunk of money is admirable.

The ONLY worry I would have if I were in your shoes from an EA perspective is "this $1000 I spent, would I have otherwise donated it to a super effective charity?" If the answer is yes then maybe there's some reflection to do about how you are approaching effectiveness. But if - as I'm guessin... (read more)

Thanks - maybe I'm giving them too much trust.

In their impact report they say "We’ve granted out $14.89m in total and we estimate that it will avert 102m tonnes in CO2-equivalent emissions."

I would not give too much credence to that from a non-EA aligned org, but I've been giving them decent credence with regards to counterfactual impact reporting since they're EA aligned.

You're saying I should treat their reports less like givewell reports, and more like I would treat a random non EA charity. Any particular arguments for why? Or is it just that you wouldn't take the prior of assuming that they are at the evaluation quality of givewell? (Or maybe you don't trust givewell on this either)

6
MatthewDahlhausen
4mo
GiveWell has dozens of researchers putting tens of thousands of hours of work into coming up with better models and variable estimates. Their most critical inputs are largely determined by RCTs, and they are constantly working to get better data. A lot of their uncertainty comes from differences in moral weights in saving vs. improving lives. Founders Pledge makes models using monte carlo simulations on complex theory of change models where the variables ranges are made up because they are largely unknowable. It's mostly Johannes, with a few assistant researchers, putting in a few hundreds of hours into model choice and parameter selection - with many more hours spent on writing and coding for their monte carlo analysis (which Givewell doesn't have to do, because they've got much simpler impact models in spreadsheets). FP has previously made 1/mtCO2e cost-effectiveness claims based on models like this, which was amplified in MacAskill's WWOTF. This model is wildly optimistic. FP now disowns that particularly model, but won't take it down or publicly list it as a mistake. They no longer publish their particular intervention CEAs publicly, though they may resume soon. My biggest criticism is that when making these complex theory-of-change models, the structure of model often matters more than than the variable inputs. While FP tries to pick "conservative" variable value assumptions (they rarely are), the model structure is wildly optimistic for their chosen interventions (generally technology innovation policy). For model feedback, FP doesn't have a good culture or process in place that deals with criticism well, a complaint that I've heard from several in the EA climate space. I think FP's uncertainty work has promise as a tool, but I think the recommendations they come up with are largely wrong given their chosen model structure and inputs. GiveWell's recommendations in the health space are of vastly higher quality and certainty than FP's in the climate space.
6
jackva
4mo
Thanks, Luke! Uncertainty As we frequently point out, one should take the estimates with a grain of salt and consider the reported uncertainty (e.g. the old estimate had something like 0.1 USD/tCO2e to 10 USD/tCO2e) and, IIRC, the impact report also reports that these estimates are extremely uncertain and reports wide ranges. As we discussed in our recent methodology-focused update, we think large uncertainty is unavoidable when operating in climate as a global decadal challenge with the most effective interventions inherently non-RCT-able (FWIW, I would think similarly about Global Health and Development, which is why I think the certainty focus of (historical) GiveWell can be harmful when the goal is to risk-neutrally identify the best interventions), so our main focus is on getting the relative comparisons right which is what is decision-relevant. Offsets provide no information with regards to the cost-effectiveness of risk-neutral philanthropy That said, using offsets to make the case that our estimates must be overly optimistic, seems mistaken. Offsets solve a different problem, high certainty (uncertainty-avoidant) emissions reductions from direct action.  This cannot be very cheap.  It is very plausible that risk-neutrality and leveraging mechanisms such as advocacy, trajectory changes, and others provides a large multiplier upon offsets at the cost of more uncertainty (though that uncertainty cuts both ways, uncertain things can also turn out to be even better than their expected value suggests). FWIW, Giving Green who used to be critical of this claim has also converged onto this position, now emphasizing philanthropic bets over offsets quite explicitly and much more confidently than they used to. Just as OP thinks that their risk-neutral global health and development works dominates GiveWell charities despite being more uncertain about their own work, it is entirely plausible that credible offsets cost > USD 100t/CO2e while good philanthropic opportu

I have actually been thinking of creating a tool to help people do exactly what you are trying to do! I will DM you after I make my first version to get your input

Were in a little bit of a tangent but an interesting one I think. I've heard that idea before about special obligation towards christians, but I've never found it very compelling - less for strict theological reasons and more for emotional, philosophical, and commonsense morality reasons (my common sense may differ from others' of course).

I'm much more moved by the story of the Good Samaritan or Jesus' instruction to care for the least of these than Paul's exhortations.

But I also don't put that much stock in what Paul says relative to other Christians (htt... (read more)

That's awesome to hear - it was worth the effort of me writing it up then!

Agreed with harfe's comment - if your goal is just to offset your own emissions then you would probably want to donate a bit less. If you don't fly more than the average American, then probably $20. Veganism might push the number down a little bit too, but like harfe said, the intercontinental flights are a bigger factor.

Of course I wouldn't discourage anyone from donating above and beyond the amount needed to offset their own emissions!

2
Hayven Frienby
5mo
Thanks so much. I didn’t get a notification for harfe’s post, but I’ll have to read it as well. Thank you both for your response to my question, it’s a big help!

thank you! Exactly what I was looking for

I don't think it's taking it off course! Thanks for your perspective

I disagree that the problem of nuclear war is wildly intractable - people have been dealing with the issue more-or-less successfully for 80 years. And based on the Vox article, we are in a time where nuclear issues are relatively more important and more neglected than they were say 20 years ago.

To think that there's no organization that can have a meaningful impact on in this time seems unlikely to me. To believe that I think you'd have to believe that no organization in the past 80 years ... (read more)

3
Chris Leong
5mo
I wasn’t claiming that the current organisations haven’t had an impact, but that they haven’t really provided a path to solving this issue. Then again, maybe “solving” is a mistaken frame.

For sure! Let me know if you want to chat.

On "why high skill immigration", I wrote another blog post on my decision to focus on it:

"I have a strong belief in the importance of immigrants to the US, both as a matter of fact (economically/ culturally/ scientifically) and as a matter of what the US should aspire to be.

Living in Kenya makes this especially salient - it was so easy for me to move here and I think I am doing good. There are so many people here who can’t move to the US, and I think that they would do good.

I think allowing immigration of skilled w... (read more)

wow, very poor link-wrangling by me. thank you for catching - fixed now!

I think this is a hugely important issue, and am excited someone else is thinking about it too! 

I did a bit of thinking on this last year, and tried for a few months in my spare time to take some action on high-skilled immigration specifically. Ultimately I wasn't able to find anything super tractable for me to work on since I currently live in Kenya (but I was more focused volunteer/part time things, not full time).

 I wrote up my conclusions in a blog post here.

In Germany there's this organization Malengo that you could potentially volunteer wit... (read more)

2
Amber Dawn
5mo
Thank you so much for this! I may get in touch to chat more about your experiences if I look into this further. The three organizations you mention are probably not a good fit for me because of location (I'm based in the UK), but maybe there are similar ones nearer me.  I'm curious about why you focussed on high-skilled immigration. 
4
Tym
5mo
Thanks Luke for the comment I think you might be one of the most qualified people around here for this question. I just wanted to give the heads up that the Formally link is a dead end and the blog link doesn't link directly to the post. I tried finding the specific post but I likely missed it.

Development as Freedom by Amartya Sen is the book in this genre that has influenced my thinking most. Very conceptual.

2
NickLaing
7mo
Thanks man will check it out skittish I'm not always the best with conceptual books hahaha. appreciate the tip!

There are definitely different levels of sacrifice. I certainly wouldn't compare any sacrifice I've made to what Mandela, or King, or Jesus did.

But I don't think sacrifice is an inappropriate word in this context. We say that athletes make sacrifices to achieve their goals - in terms of time, physical pain, dietary restrictions, giving up socialization to get enough sleep. I think the sorts of tradeoffs an EA might be confronted with are comparable to that notion of sacrifice - giving up certain luxuries to donate more, or working on an important project f... (read more)

Thank you so much Catherine! Very inspiring post. I appreciate the details of how you were feeling at each point in time, and how you now feel looking back.

I know you say you don't really endorse this thought: "oh these young EA whippersnappers, expecting so much! They don’t know how good they got it...". 

But at least in my case, I have noticed recently that I have been <inserting financial or personal sacrifice> and expecting something back in return. So you sharing your instinctive reaction was exactly what I needed to hear to remind me there are other (often better) ways to think about sacrifice.

3
NickLaing
7mo
Sacrifice is an interesting concept. In my background of Christianity it is the topic of endless debate. Sometimes people obviously sacrifice for a cause (martin Luther king, Nelson Mandela). But if someone like usI just gives up potential money and comfort but gain peace, satisfaction and deep meaning in our life, canwe really don't that as sacrifice or should we just call it good life decisions?

Hi Emmanuel, I'm sorry to hear that you feel that rules were unexplained and changing in the process.

I see that you have emailed me on the same, and will respond there. 

I too am finding it hard to articulate. Maybe it's just captured in the impact I talked about in the original post about creating jobs, helping the startup ecosystem, giving me money I can then donate, etc. So I shouldn't pretend that in addition to all that there is some other nebulous "benefit of a company vs nonprofit" just to increase the warm fuzzies I feel.

But there's also a mathematical sense in which a shilling saved (the way Kapu has impact) is better than a shilling earned.

  • Imagine someone makes and eans exactly 500 shillings per day. You can e
... (read more)

Thanks a lot for sharing, and thanks for working so hard to make the world a better place! 

1
SofiaBalderson
7mo
Thanks for reading Luke and thank you for the kind words 😊

Hi Yonatan, thank you so much for the super kind words! I had not thought at all about posting on the 80k hours board - I will talk with our HR person about if she thinks that makes sense. I'd love to talk with you - I'll DM you

Wow, that means a lot because sometimes I feel quite unthoughtful and uncurious when I read your excellent tweets!

Haven't had any EA non-profits ask me about that. I still don't have that much experience (only 1.5 years) in the grand scheme of things but would me more than happy to try to help anyone who thinks they could benefit from talking to me.

Overall I've become a lot more brave since working here. Just saying "look I'm 60% sure this will work, but we need to make a decision rather than waiting on this for 2 more weeks so let's just go." It doesn't a... (read more)

Thanks a lot! I also always love seeing your perspective on the forum as someone else in East Africa.

I actually did a back of the enveleope calculation like that (several months after joining Kapu  - so I definitely had an incenteive to rationalize my own choice) and ended up with something like "this looks better than working at an impactful US company, and comprable to earning to give but I am really excited by the work here and not at all by earning to give so I have rationalized my decision to work here".  Happy to DM on some of the startups ... (read more)

2
NickLaing
7mo
So good man nice to hear. Love the "shooting from the hip" always a big fan of that ;).  Also I agree instinctively with this and am keen to hear more "And I think there are strong systemic benefits from that dollar coming from an economically sustainable business rather than from donations.", but not at all sure of the extent of it or why this might be. OneDay Health centers all run basically as close-to-self-sustaining small  businesses, and apart from the sustainability and scalability potential of an economically, I feel there might be other systemic benefits too, but find it hard to put my finger on it What do you think those systemic benefits might be?

Thanks a lot for the great post! 

I've also been learning a lot lately about nuclear safety, deterrence, the cold war, etc. mostly inspired by the Oppenheimer movie. I've been looking for people to talk through these issues with.

If anybody reading this is looking to talk more about these kinds of issues DM me - I'd love to share what I've learned, see what other people have learned, and just talk about the fascinating history and ethics surrounding atomic weapons use.

I just invest in s and p 500, and in vanguards recommended retirement account. I don't try to take into account hoe much good or bad they do, partially out of skepticism of the counterfactual impact of impact investing, and partly out of inertia. If anyone knows of ea-principled work on this I'd be happy to change my approach

Answer by Luke EureAug 08, 20238
0
0
1
1

Good questions! Curious how other EAs do this too

I donate 20% post tax. I also set a spending limit for myself ot 2k USD per month. Besides that I save everything.

With that savings I max out my retirement account savings each year (5500 USD in the US). That all goes into an index fund Rest of my savings mostly goes into index funds unless I have one off exciting investment opportunities (eg if my startup is raising a round. They were last year and I invested 10k)

The savings is basically earmarked for "giving me financial security and doing some good in th... (read more)

2
Simon Riezebos
9mo
Thanks for sharing! How do you choose index funds? Do you try to take into account how much good or bad they do through their investments?

“Ubuntu stresses empathy and compassion, enabling people to sympathize with the difficulties and goals of others.” I really like this thread throughout the post. When I wear my EA hat I often start thinking very individualistically like “how can I optimize my impact” rather than thinking collectively. I think I would be better off thinking from more of an Ubuntu perspective. Thank you!

0[comment deleted]9mo

makes sense on the understanding of contextual nuances - I agree that on-the-ground understanding is under-practiced in charity work generally, including in EA.

I still don't quite understand what you're advocating for in terms of targeted funding. Don't most EA organizations and individuals donating in EA already do targeted funding?

You say "Instead of dispersing funds indiscriminately or generically, targeted funding directs resources to specified areas or objectives in order to accomplish desired results." 

Are there examples you are thinking of... (read more)

0[comment deleted]9mo

I’m not clear what the main argument is. Is it simply that EA approaches have already helped Africa broadly across a variety of issues, and that EAs should continue funding and doing initiatives in Africa? Or are there particular types of work you think are neglected and that EA should focus on?

Lots of good points here!

Just to isolate and respond on the "black tax" comment: The perspective I have heard from talking to Kenyan entrepreneurs about this is I have a familial financial obligation that expat  entrepreneurs do not have. It prevents me from being as risk-taking as I might otherwise be

Here is a direct quote from an entrepreneur I interviewed for a project: "there's so many cool, really smart Kenyans and local entrepreneurs. But then there's the sort of like 'black tax'. It's family, and there's all this stuff. And the pressure to make... (read more)

4
NickLaing
10mo
Thanks for the response man, the phenomenon 100% holds back entrepreneurs, I've heard that many times as well and agree with that! And its definitely an obligation no disagreement there which I agree "black tax" captures.  My inclination though is that despite that the obligation may actually well be net positive, as it forces many people to spend money on things which are better for the world than if they spent them it on themselves. The obsession with entrepreneurship here is very interesting, its a huge discussion we won't have right now but I've got mixed feelings about whether its necessarily something that leads to good outcomes and should be strongly encouraged. Nice one.

I strongly agree. 

Funding seems quite tractable - there could be a fund specifically for assisting EAs from Africa to go to conferences.

On the visa assistance thing I'm not sure what would be very tractable - maybe there is some way these conferences could position themselves that would make it easier for Africans to get "education"-related visas rather than tourist visas (e.g., if EAG positioned itself as an academic conference somehow, would that enable people to apply under more lenient visa categories)?

1
Christopher Isu
1y
This is insightful.. and would really go a long way in enhancing the participation of Africans and other less represented regions in EA activities if well implemented.
-1
saline_A
1y
Very insightful

It's the geographic proximity that I get hung up on though. He is right in front of the Samaritan. I can't think of any parables that involve someone showing mercy to a person who is not right in front of them.

Every time Jesus performs a miracle, it is for someone right in front of him.

I am strongly in favor of more impartiality, but think most Christians find it a stretch to say that the Good Samaritan parable is meant to imply we should care for future people and people on the other side of the world who they will never meet.

It's a good point about the moral circle expansion.

Maybe I can flip it and ask you: To the extent that Christians do not behave impartially towards people in other countries or people who won't be born for hundreds of years, do you think they are failing to follow the teachings of Christ?

2
dominicroser
1y
Hm, hard question. Personally, I would think: -- If we don't radically expand our concern and love relative to the status quo, we are not following the teachings of Christ -- It's hard to see the specific kind and strength of impartiality that utilitarianism recommends in the Bible (but this doesn't mean, as I said in the first point, that the status quo is OK)

Thanks for the pushback!

I am not trying to argue that Christianity does not support impartiality - there are certainly plausible readings of Jesus's teachings (like that of the Good Samaritan) as plausibly supporting impartiality.

I'm more trying to argue that Jesus's teaching does not necessarily push you to that conclusion.

Jesus is very explicit about the importance of things like:

  • helping those in need - the widow, the orphan
  • being faithful to the Father
  • being humble and meek
  • not seeking salvation in this world

And the church has emphasized those teachings in... (read more)

6
Harrison Durland
1y
I don't really think this is a fair standard, or at least it feels like a motte-and-bailey when compared to the post title ("Impartiality is not baked into to Christianity"). I don't think that Jesus' teaching "necessarily" pushes self-identifying Christians to believe almost anything. You write that   But in fact there are plenty of megachurches and preachers that seemingly extract and teach contrary lessons (e.g., Pastor Dollar). There are also many pagan/spiritualist versions of Christianity that embrace very different teachings.  You ask My short answer is "broadly yes, even if not strongly in all dimensions of impartiality," as I previewed in my original comment: I think people are inherently (including through socialization) prone to care more about their geographic and ethnic neighbors, but I do not think Christianity strongly reinforces this. In fact, I think the Bible clearly promotes the opposite principle: impartiality, as most broadly summarized in the Golden Rule. Whether Christians are inclined to interpret this to apply to future generations and very distant neighbors is a separate question.

Seems like working at Novavax to improve their implementation could be a super high-value career choice!

Makes me think that a list of "companies that are underrated and critical in important supply chains" could be quite a useful resource for people brainstorming career options.

Unfortunately I don't know anything at all about this literature, but I wouldn't be surprised if there weren't many studies. There are certaintly non-altruistic reasons for existing governments to favor schooling as we have it - teaching rule-following, instilling patriotism, ability to mold young minds in a particular kind of way.

My guess would be that there are huge improvements to be had in the ways that most countries do education, and that more experiments would be helpful. More radical education attempts seem valuable.

A few thoughts:

  1. It seems like these things that schools do in terms of restricting speech, movement, and association, parents also do for their kids. Do you think parenting also violates these rights?
  2. "opportunities for play and exploration that are not compulsary" are certainly granted to children in the US where school does not take up all of a child's time and they can go play, read books, do whatever they want outside of school  (as long as their parents allow)

Also note that in the US, a child does not have to "go to school" as much as they have to ... (read more)

1
Melissa Merritt
1y
I tried to find on Google Scholar at least one experimental study that compared schooling with unschooling (sometimes defined as "learning without a curriculum"), in many cultural contexts, and that came to the conclusion that schooling was better on some dimensions. I thought that there would be dozens, if not hundreds, of such studies. But I didn't find that. I know that absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. But when I searched further I found that there were studies (although not always experiments) that compared those two and found that unschooling had some benefits. Unfortunately, the experiments weren't exactly rigorous, but at least there are some. I wish there were more studies that compared schooling with unschooling, so that we'd be sure that we're on right track as societies when it comes to education. If I'm right and those experiments are few, then it could possibly mean that we're doing education in a way that handicaps students. Who knows, maybe if unschooling was more popular, then more students would know their perfect jobs, would be less inclined to support authoritarianism, would be more resilient, less depressed and anxious, would be better at their jobs, and so on? Or would they be less conscienscious, less willing to discipline themselves, less atuned to their cultural roots, and so on? It's sad that these experiments seem to be few and far between. Or maybe I'm just bad at searching for them online? What do you think of this? Some studies: 1. Benezet, L. P. (1935/1936). The teaching of Arithmetic: The Story of an Experiment. Originally published in Journal of the National Education Association in three parts. Vol. 24, #8, pp 241-244; Vol. 24, #9, p 301-303; & Vol. 25, #1, pp 7-8. 2. Herbert D. W. (1930). Experiment in Self-Directed Education. School and Society, 31, 715-718. 3. Gray, P., Riley, G. (2013) The Challenges and Benefits of Unschooling, According to 232 Families Who Have Chosen that Route. Journal of Unschooling a

Follow up on this - I downgraded my prioritization of this as an intervention after talking to a friend in Nairobi who told me that overperscription of anti-biotics is a huge issue in Nairobi. In lots of neighbourhoods, the informal medical clinic will just prescribe you strong antibiotics for relatively mild symptoms. 

This made me 

1. doubt that people will use randomly distributed antibiotics correctly - so less upside

2. give more credence to the idea that passing them out randomly could increase antibody resistance - potential downside

1
NickLaing
1y
Correct downsides! Another is that when people physically have medication already from a handout, they often just take that no matter what sickness they get, which can be really dangerous. Along a similar ish lines, there has been a bunch of research though on giving all newborns for example antibiotics and prophylactic malaria treatment, and in some high risk circumstances just swallowing antibiotics even when you are not sick may do more good than harm. It's complicated.

Brian drain is an interesting topic. The brief research and thinking I've done on brain drain leaves me without clear answers as to what an individual facing a decision to emigrate should actually do.

Even if it is in aggregate bad that so many people move from poorer to richer countries (which is not obvious to me), it could still be the rational thing to do on an individual basis.

I would love to see a sort of guide based on EA-principles written for people in low-middle income countries considering moving to higher-income countries.

  • what are the benefits y
... (read more)

Hi Gregory, thank you so much for this thoughtful reply!

This is exactly the kind of discussion and analysis I was hoping to encourage with this post.

  • Your upshot totally makes sense to me: E2G is probably a bad idea in lower-income countries. 
  • I also buy that being a practicing doctor likely is not the most impactful thing most people in lower-income countries can do either
  • So what is? A lot of the career considerations probably are still directionally right: government policy, org building at effective nonprofits, research into global priorities, etc.
  • Bu
... (read more)

This is a super interesting idea! I like this push for more object-level thinking. I live in Kenya - may be worthwhile to do in the poorer regions here. Heading home for Christmas and maybe I will bring back a suitcase full, then travel around the northern deserts handing them out.

 

Making this really practical, here are the things I'm thinking through on actually doing this:

  • Deciding whether or not to do this:
    • Is any other organization already doing this in the region I would be going to?
    • What is the most likely cause of death in the specific area I woul
... (read more)
2
Luke Eure
1y
Follow up on this - I downgraded my prioritization of this as an intervention after talking to a friend in Nairobi who told me that overperscription of anti-biotics is a huge issue in Nairobi. In lots of neighbourhoods, the informal medical clinic will just prescribe you strong antibiotics for relatively mild symptoms.  This made me  1. doubt that people will use randomly distributed antibiotics correctly - so less upside 2. give more credence to the idea that passing them out randomly could increase antibody resistance - potential downside

I'm super excited about this! Seems like there's a lot of potential. Just a few half-thought observations and data points below in case helpful.

A potential  worry about the restaurant-first approach - anecdotally it seems like hip restaurants in places like NYC/Boston/Philly may already doing quite a bit with tofu in different varieties. The mechanism by which food goes from "being used in chic restaurants" to "drastically changing the volume of tofu eaten" probably needs some proving.

 For example the first (non-random) restaurants I looked up ha... (read more)

2
George Stiffman
1y
Yum, thanks for sharing that link! Cool to hear that there's exciting tofu happening in Kenya. And absolutely, I think you're right - making tofu hip doesn't necessarily mean it will spread. That said, it's hard to imagine the tofu market growing without it becoming a more desirable food, and that seems easiest via restaurants for now. A lot of work to still be done!

Hi Guy, I wrote up an update here: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/Ee4q4RhbjZTG9DKZ8/update-on-pestering-embassies-to-reduce-non-policy-barriers

I'm happy to give more detail if it's helpful! I don't really think anything I did was particularly impactful due to not understanding the system well enough, and due to "advocacy from Americans" being less of a limiting factor than "political capital within the embassy"

Thank you! Agreed that EA as a community often overlooks the value of protests and social change. Excited to look more deeply into the report

On “backfire” - do you have any view on backfire of BLM protests? I’ve been concerned with the pattern of protest -> police stop enforcing in a neighborhood -> murder rates go up. Seems like if this does happen, it really raises the bar as the long run positive effects protests like this need to achieve in order to offset the medium term murder increase.

But maybe I’m thinking of this wrong. Or maybe this would... (read more)

Thank you so much! Let me write to Kneedler. May do a FOIA request later too

Absolutely, it's a lose-lose, unforced error.

 

For channels see my comment to Guy Raveh with what I've done so far!

Thanks! See my comment to Guy Raveh with what I've done so far!

Load more