All of vishal's Comments + Replies

Ought is a team of people, each of whom have their own worldviews, values, and communities. For some Oughters, being an EA is an important part of their identity. Others have only heard about it recently!  I think everyone at Ought cares about being effective and altruistic though :)

Note that your argument here is roughly Ben Pace's position in this post which we co-wrote. I argued against Ben's position in the post because I thought it was too extreme, but I agree with both of you that most EAs aren't going far enough in that direction.

Thanks for this reply! Sorry for not realizing you worked at DeepMind; my comment would have looked different had I known about our shared context. (Also, consider writing a bio!) I think we're aligned in our desire to see more early-career EAs apply to those roles (and on most other things). My post aimed to: 1. Provide some background on some of the more "successful" people associated with EA. 2. Point out that "recruiting people with lots of career capital" may be comparable to "acquiring career capital" as a strategy to maximize impact. Of course, the latter makes the former easier, if you actually succeed, but it also takes more time. On point (2): What fraction of the money/social capital EA will someday acquire "already exists"? Is our future going to look more like "lots of EA people succeeded", or "lots of successful people found EA"? Historically, both strategies seem to have worked for different social movements; the most successful neoliberals grew into their influence, while the Fabian Society relied on recruiting top talent. (I'm not a history expert, and this could be far too simple.) -- One concern I have about the "maximize career capital" strategy is that it has tricky social implications; it's easy for a "most people should do X" message to become "everyone who doesn't do X is wrong", as Richard points out. But career capital acquisition doesn't lead to as much direct competition between EAs, and could produce more skill-per-person in the process, so perhaps it's actually just better for most people. Some of my difficulty in grasping the big picture for the community as a whole is that I don't have a sense for what early-career EAs are actually working on. Sometimes, it feels like everyone is a grad student or FAANG programmer (not much potential for outsize returns). At other times, it feels like everyone is trying to start a company or a charity (lots of potential, lots of risk). Is there any specific path you think not enough people i