Digital person

As Holden Karnofsky uses the term toterm, "digital person" may refer to human whole brain emulations  as well as digital "descendants" of humans:humans.^[1]

The central case I'll focus on is that of digital people just like us, perhaps created via mind uploading (simulating human brains). However, one could also imagine entities unlike us in many ways, but still properly thought of as "descendants" of humanity; those would be digital people as well.

Karnofsky writes that "the transformative potential of something like digital people, combined with how quickly AI could lead According to it, form the case that we could be in the most important century".^[2]

In particular, Karnofsky argues thatKarnofsky, digital people would have the same moral standing as humans (cf. moral patient), would accelerate economic growth and scientific progress,progress, and could cause a "lock-"lock-in" of values.values.  For this reason, Karnofsky writes:

Mostconsiders the emergence of digital people a transformative development, as well as one that, because of advances in artificial intelligence, could occur this piececentury—making it potentially the most important one in human history.^[2] would apply to roughly any digital entities that (a) had moral value and human rights, like non-digital people; (b) could interact with their environments with equal (or greater) skill and ingenuity to today's people. With enough understanding of how (a) and (b) work, it could be possible to design digital people without imitating human brains.

1. ^{^}

   "The central case I'll focus on is that of digital people just like us, perhaps created via mind uploading (simulating human brains). However, one could also imagine entities unlike us in many ways, but still properly thought of as "descendants" of humanity; those would be digital people as well." Karnofsky, Holden (2021) Digital people would be an even bigger deal, Cold Takes, July 27.

2. ^{^}

   Karnofsky, Holden (2021) Digital people FAQ, Cold Takes, July 27.