All of Anton Rodenhauser's Comments + Replies

We can host ~100ppl outside in the garden and max 40 ppl inside. I'll keep you updated here in the comments if place is getting too full. We might go to the park nearby!

Ring at "Wäldchen, Rodenhauser". Flat is 3rd floor on the right, but we'll probably hangout in the garden outside at first/all of the time.

To ppl living in Berlin: It would be great if you can bring picnic plankets and everything else one might need sitting outside in a garden! Thanks :)

This is amazing! Reading this made me very happy and more hopeful for the future!

Awesome stuff! I can highly second the "loving kindness meditation in front of mirror towards yourself" meditations! I had some of the most impactful meditations of my life this way!

I love it! Someone shoukd make a YouTube video or even a movie or some other media about it!

I do find summaries of audio, especially podcass, extremely useful!

1
Trish
2y
Thanks for the feedback!

This sounds like a great stuff for a startup idea/(effective) entrepreneur ship. But It's probably not a good idea for a cause area. Public perception would be a problem.

2
Aleksi Maunu
2y
Can you expand on this? Is it that anything to do with genes is controversial? Maybe also the possibility that success in this could increase rich people's societal advantages over poor people even more? (I listened to the post yesterday and might've forgotten some key points)

I highly second the "longer meditation sessions" thing since I had a similar experience.  I feel like many people are giving up on meditation too early, saying "it doesn't do much for me", without ever really having tried it.  I spent one year meditating for 20 minutes each day. It probably did make me happier, but not in a dramatic way. Then I went on a 10-day silent meditation retreat and started meditating 1+ hours a day for a while and got dramatic benefits to the point that I feel like picking up meditation is by far the most impactful thing I've ever done to improve my well-being.

Well, but of course not everyone is in a position to meditate that much.

2
JakubK
2y
In 2019 I spent a few months doing 45-60 minutes per day and experienced dramatic improvements to my well-being, basically from "somewhat bad" to "quite good." I've been able to maintain somewhere between "somewhat good" and "very good" for most of the time since then with only 10-20 minutes per day, which is what I had been doing for ~1 year before the more intense practice. This trend could be regression to the mean since I've historically had pretty high well-being. It may also be that the more intense practice resolved a particular mental difficulty I had been experiencing for ~6 months. Note that intense meditation comes with higher risks; see Willoughby Britton's work. I would not recommend trying 10-day retreats or the Finder's Course without researching these risks and considering your personal risk factors.
7
Peter
2y
That's a great point - I've definitely also noticed a huge difference between a few minutes and an hour. The happiest I was all year was when I was meditating an hour a day. Though for me even 1 minute is also a huge difference compared to 0 minutes.

Our microbiomes age with us and gets worse over time. You can actually predict a person's age just by looking at their microbiome.

That's why you want as young as possible donors. And that's why FMT might even be a longevity intervention. You can rejuvenate old mice with FMTs from young ones! 

I'm a (conditional) optimist. On an intuitive gut level, I can't wait for AGI and maybe even something like the singularity to happen!

I regurlarly think about this to me extremely inspiring fact that "It's totally possible, plausible, maybe even likely, that one special day in the next 10-60 years I will wake up and almost all of humanity's problems will have been solved with the help of AI".

When I sit in a busy park and watch the people around me, I think to myself: "On that special day... all the people I see here, all the people I know... if they are st... (read more)

1
Noah Scales
2y
That seems like a powerful vision, actually outside the realm of possibility because of its contradictions of how humans function emotionally, but seductive nonetheless, literally, a heaven on Earth. I don't see how you get past limitations of essential identity or physical continuity  in order to guarantee a life that allows hopes and dreams without a life that includes worry or loss, but it could involve incomplete experience (for example, the satisfaction of seeing someone happy even though you haven't actually seen them), deceptive experience (for example, an illusion that makes sad people look happy to you), or virtual experience (you exist in a solo world, a virtual construction where nothing exists except you and the AI that creates your experience of a solipsistic world with happy, worry-free people). Those all have some appeal to me, I confess.

I'd change the title of this post to "EA for non-geniuses".

Someone around 100-120 IQ isn't dumb, but actually still above avr!

I couldn't agree more with this post! E.g. I feel like there should be an "80k for average smart people in the 100-130IQ ranche".

3
Lumpyproletariat
2y
The 100-130 IQ range contains most of the United State's senators.  You don't need a license to be more ambitious than the people around you, you don't need to have  131 IQ or greater to find the most important thing and do your best. I'm confident in your ability to have a tremendous outsize impact in the world, if you choose to attempt it.
8
constructive
2y
I honestly don't see why. I think I'm much below 130 and still, 80k advised me. The texts they write about why AI might literally kill all of us and what I could do to prevent are not only relevant for oxford graduates but also for me who just attended an average German University. I think everyone can contribute to the world's most pressing problems. What's needed is not intelligence but ambition and open-mindedness. EA is not just math geniuses devising abstract problems it's hundreds of people running the everyday work of organizations, coming up with new approaches to community building, becoming politically active to promote animal welfare, or earning money to donate to the most important causes. None of these are only possible with an above-average IQ. 

That's a great point! In fact, my next step was contacting them. Anyone knows them and might be able to introduce me?

I would say that FMTs are very safe to do at home. After all, you are just swallowing some pills or do an enema. The tricky part is donor screening for anything infectious. But it is easy to find out what to screen for and order the tests online or get a doctor to do them for you. 

 

But yeah, doing these tests for the donor is absolutely necessary, and it can be  dangerous if the donor isn't thoroughly screened! 

>Is it helpful for other chronic diseases? If so, how much and is it cost-effective?

I totally agree that the science isn't settled yet at all! But please see the “Why aren’t scientists more excited…” section. 

Also keep in mind that for many chronic diseases alternative effective treatments simply don’t exist yet, e.g. chronic fatigue syndrome, IBS, etc. Sure, the evidence on FMTs may not be conclusive. But it is at least suggestive. And that’s much better than nothing for many chronically ill. You don't need "definite proof" to make it worth a try, given that it is fairly easy, safe, and cheap (if you know the donor and he just gives his stool to you) to do FMTs yourself!


 

Could it be that "working at kurzgesagt" is an effective thing to do? One of the legitimate "communication paths"?

EAs working at Kurzgesagt could:

  •  steer them to create even more EA-aligned content
  • gain valuable "communication knowledge", to be used to create EA content later/elsewhere. Kurzgesagt does such a great job promoting ideas like longtermism in an uncontroversial not weird way that gets people to obviously agree with it - something EA often struggles with within media. We need to learn from them! And we want all the great EA content from 80k a
... (read more)
1
David M
2y
Great point. I wonder what’s the role behind a video that has the most influence on its success - the scriptwriter? The visual designer? Or someone a bit more zoomed out?

It will be hard/impossible to find a design that suits everyone. One solution might be:

  • offer multiple design versions (let others submit them)
  • allow people to pre-commit to buying the designs of their choice
  •  if enough people for it to be worth it for you pre-commit to the same design, it will be printed and sold. Otherwise, nothing happens.

But yeah, much more effort!

Fantastic to see this happening!

Is the design already fixed in stone?

I'd suggest:

  • Making the words straight, not curved
  • Increase their font size
  • and make them two lines (maybe with the image between them?)

"The universe is vast, dark, and cold, but we are not.

The laws of physics are indifferent to desperation, hope, or love. But we are not.

There is no destiny written for us in the stars, so we write our own.

The stars and the mountains do not care, but we do! There is light in this world and it is us!"

———--

from a secular solstice. I'd pre-commit to buying a t-shirt with any of those paragraphs with some cool cosmic futuristic design.

3
Tomer_Goloboy
2y
Done. Thank you for the inspiration!

I love it! A newsletter notifying you about new products would be great (assuming there is more to come). I'd love "existential hope" themed motives!

3
Tomer_Goloboy
2y
I'll try to set that up for sure!  In the meantime, you can follow us on Instagram @shop_misercordia  (https://www.instagram.com/shop_misercordia/). With regards to existential hope, I'm looking into some designs for utopian cities, as well. Thank you so much!! 

Scott Alexander wrote a nice article on what the Republican's program could/should be: https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/a-modest-proposal-for-republicans?s=r   

UwU
2y13
0
0

I think the OP is advocating a prize for solving the whole problem, not specific subproblems, which is a novel and interesting idea. Kind of like the $1M Millennium Prize Problems (presumably we should offer far more).

If you offer a prize for the final thing instead of an intermediate one people may also take more efficient paths to the goal than the one we're looking at. I see no downside to doing it, I mean you don't lose any money unless someone actually presents a real solution.

While not directly EA, I think fiction isalso great to promote some ideas from the Progress Movement, namely humanism, agency, and the idea that "problems are hard, but solvable".

I also feel that the idea that "actually, humans are good, and humanity is worth protecting" needs some promotion. We are not just some greedy, aggressive, nature-destroying species that the earth would probably be better off without!

How about Qualia Research Institute?

https://www.qualiaresearchinstitute.org/blog/history-2021-strategy#what-we-would-do-with-more-funding