All of Tandena Wagner's Comments + Replies

While EA is not fully at the table yet, EcoResilience Initiative is an EA group trying to answer exactly those questions: 

"What are the problems we're trying to solve?" "What are the most neglected aspects of those problems?" and "What is the most cost-effective way to address those neglected areas?"

So far we're 1) maintaining a big list of biodiversity interventions (not just protecting land!), 2) investigating which of these  are the most effective types of interventions, 3) identifying ways people can donate to projects working on those highly... (read more)

Hi, I really appreciate your independent thinking. I strongly suspect that the main reason people are not choosing to have more kids is because of the raising kids portion, not the pregnancy portion. At least that's my reason for not having more kids.  If this (the difficulty of raising kids, rather than birthing them) is the main bottleneck for most families, then I suspect the best ways to boost fertility would be mostly policy things along the lines of:

  • Less strict zoning laws --> more abundant, cheaper housing so young couples can more easily af
... (read more)
1
medinot
Thank you so much for this thoughtful and pragmatic response. I agree with all of these points. I had a look at Hungary's income incentives briefly and am astounded by how extreme they are. There is a non-linear reduction on your taxable income per additional child you have ($203 per per child per month for one child vs. $667 per child per month for three children). Also, which forum do you recommend I share any research on?

Hi, thank you for voicing this concern. I read your recent post, “Rewilding Is Extremely Bad.”

Personally, I doubt that most wild animals have negative lives. (informed by analogy to most of our own history of subsistence-level survival, and my doubt that they would consider their lives to have not been worth living). I also don’t believe that total hedonic utilitarianism is a complete frame for thinking about this. I think it is important to factor in people's and animals' preferences for continued existence. Mostly I think we just don't know much about th... (read more)

2
Bentham's Bulldog
Thanks!   I don't think the analogy with subsistence humans is a good one because the basic argument for net negative animal welfare doesn't apply to them.  The basic argument is: most animals have very short lives that culminate in a painful death, and a few days of life isn't enough to recoup the harms of a painful death.  This doesn't apply to long-lived hunter-gatherers.  Fwiw, I don't think it applies to animals either--it seems plausible that elephants mostly live good lives, for example.  But the most numerous animals are worms, then insects, then fish, then amphibians, then reptiles--nearly all the most numerous animals have bad lives.   I don't think hedonic utilitarianism is a complete frame either--I'm an objective list theorist fwiw, but I don't think that it has huge implications because animals don't have many significant non-hedonic goods.  I don't think nature has intrinsic value, but even if I did, this would be outweighed by the staggeringly large amount of suffering that exists even in small plots of lands (hundreds of bugs per square feet).  As I said in that piece, I think even pretty small chunks of land could contain extreme suffering, so this probably swamps whatever intrinsic value nature might have.   I agree that biodiversity isn't automatically the same as increasing ecosystem productivity.  In fact, I'd generally tend to support preserving herbivores, as they lower plant populations--so we could find common ground there.  I'm skeptical about carnivores generally, though depends on the detail.  I'd also be skeptical of insect zoos because those might be used to argue for preserving nature.  I saw your recent post where you describe precision agriculture which would prevent conversion of nature into farmland.  I find this very alarming!  I think farmland has fewer arthropods!  Want to come on the podcast to discuss more? 

 and I refuse to elaborate further

This was well written and informative. I'm interested in improving government performance to allow coordination and combat the problems that come with corruption, so thank you for linking away to those solutions as well. 

Besides being a local node, I think the incidental translation of EA concepts to Estonian is potentially quite valuable. 

Thank you for writing this post - I like to keep a mental list of ways conservation and wild animal welfare can work together. Somehow I forgot this fit the criteria. 

This is interesting to me as well. It seems like more of a philosophical question to me, but I have not given it though consideration to say. If you don't mind sharing, how would empirical anchors inform this?

I found the linked Case for Insect Consciousness really compelling. This is the sort of mindset I want conducting this kind of research. Reading the honest skepticism combined with careful self examination greatly boosted my respect for the project. I'm keen to learn more.

We're working on it! A quick synopsis of the more fleshed-out argument I'm hoping to post soon on the foundational philosophy: It seems oddly universal that people to care about nature. For another it seems like the sort of scarce resource (like historical artifacts) that future humans will value. I think we will place great value on it after we reach takeoff, post-scarcity, etc. Furthermore I think that a variety of experiences existing is better than a world full of similar experiences.

A portion of the philosophical basis you are looking for was recently... (read more)

Hi Ben, thank you very much for the comment!

Excellent link, I need to carefully consider it. 
-- My main thought is that alt-proteins need to be "normal" before we will know if people are willing to adopt them. My assumption is that once they are "just another foodstuff" it will depend on PTC. But right now they are new (aka scary and weird) - which would dominate the survey results. (This somewhat contradicts the increase in taste preference from informed tasting...) I like the example in the dining hall the best because it is in an environment where ... (read more)

5
Ben Stevenson
Thanks! I agree that alternative proteins can probably make a dent in meat consumption even if they aren't a silver bullet. On other meat reduction strategies, I would recommend this database from Rethink Priorities, as well as Björn's blog More Than Meats The Eye and Seth's blog Regression To The Meat. (Puns goes hard in the meat reduction space).

Hi Dave,
I just posted a list of biodiversity interventions today (working on that rigorous dive!). I'll add the ones you've listed here and would like your suggestions for further additions to the list. I care about biodiversity for some of the reasons you stated, and wonder if you can elaborate on why you think these are promising interventions for biodiversity conservation?

For example: I'm not sure how to think about using resources from wilderness for livelihoods. I would assume that this would both increase people's desire for protection of wilderness,... (read more)

Oh wow. I'm a fan of Conservation X Labs from the biodiversity side! I only know them from their conservation work, and have a positive opinion of their priorities from what I've been able to glean. 

Fertility control is one of the 20 areas I looked into for EcoResilience Initiative while investigating techniques for enhancing biodiversity, as opposed to wild animal welfare impact. I don't expect it to be the top biodiversity intervention (mostly because I'm not sure how well it will scale). But I would still say it definitely has the potential to be h... (read more)

We encourage AIs, like all members of the EA community,

 

Someone please drop a link to the mind upload, I missed it.

Tandena Wagner
1
0
0
36% disagree

I'm working on trying to describe the environmental future we want to have, so I'll have written up a better answer soon.™️

I really like the variety of cause areas you chose. Simple, appealing descriptions that draw in someone who hasn't encountered EA before. 17 hours is really short for such quality information!

1
Martina Pepiciello
Thank you so  much! I didn't do most of the research myself, though - I drew upon the existing intro post for most of the content and structure as well.

I can't stop checking the EA forum now.... 

All but 3 bullet points were about AI. I know that AI is the number one catastrophic risk but I'm dyin' for variety (news on other fronts).

Here is the non-AI content:

  • Allocation in the landscape seems more efficient than in the past – it’s harder to identify especially neglected interventions, causes, money, or skill-sets. That means it’s become more important to choose based on your motivations.
  • Post-FTX, funding has become even more dramatically concentrated under Open Philanthropy, so finding new donors seems like a much bigger priority than in the past.
... (read more)
1
Benjamin_Todd
My impression is that of EA resources focused on catastrophic risk, 60%+ are now focused on AI safety, or issues downstream of AI (e.g. even the biorisk people are pretty focused on the AI/Bio intersection). AI has also seem dramatic changes to the landscape / situation in the last ~2 years, and my update was focused on how things have changed recently. So for both reasons most of the updates that seemed salient to me concerned AI in some way. That said, I'm especially interested in AI myself, so I focused more on questions there. It would be ideal to hear from more bio people. I also briefly mention nuclear security, where I think the main update is the point about lack of funding.  

Thanks for posting this! This should really be a bigger discussion in conservation. 

Heather Browning's reflection on their being some other reason we value biodiversity resonates. 

McMahan's view is my own: that drawn out suffering from predation is wrong, but that ongoing predation is preferable to removing predation. Although I don't agree with their reasoning from uncertainty argument for keeping predation. Instead I have a jumbled mix of valuing autonomy, other lifestyles, thinking death by not-predation is worse, and valuing natural processes... (read more)

This is really getting at something I've been dancing around for awhile. I don't have quite the same read of green, but I'm not sure my own version is coherent or just "things I like." I have the start of an essay inspired by this, at least. 

Most of all: Thank you very very much.

I mostly agree with this - our powers and coordination are beyond impressive when we wield them. So a extinction risk would have to explain why we can't or don't use all of our resources to stop our own demise. Potential examples: feedback loops that are selfishly beneficial and prevent coordination, even if its leading to a slow death overall. Instances where the collapse is slow but locked-in ahead of time. So even if we decide to move heaven and earth to do something about it, its too late. 

I remembered incorrectly - it was not the plastics, but the rare earths that they were recycling. Tanzeena Hussain was the graduate student working on it and having success getting bacteria to survive in increasingly toxic environments. She was crushing up old electronics to feed the bacteria - pretty on the nose. 

It was in Elizabeth Skovran's lab at San Jose State University. This is the only write up I can find on it: https://blogs.sjsu.edu/newsroom/2023/taking-bio-recycling-to-the-next-level/

It looks like they are having enough success to file for ... (read more)

Recently I've been hearing tires are a major cause of air pollution and AND ocean plastic pollution.

 I think some changes in tire requirements could go a LONG way to improving these as I doubt much effort has gone into improving tire material's environmental impact yet.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jul/25/tyre-dust-the-stealth-pollutant-becoming-a-huge-threat-to-ocean-life
https://www.thedrive.com/news/tire-dust-makes-up-the-majority-of-ocean-microplastics-study-finds
Looks like gov might be on the case, but perhaps we could get it moving... (read more)

I've thought about this a little bit and then got stuck when it comes to figuring out where the big wins are and where the dead ends are.

In no particular order: Some metals are valuable. For this reason I don't think they are neglected but I also think the public doesn't know these metals should be recycled.

Recycling is almost certainly neglected because it is a public good that doesn't pay - these are pretty well always neglected.

Destroying things and making giant landfills feels bad and looks ugly but actually doesn't do as much damage as it feels like. ... (read more)

2
Elina Christian
Thanks! And totally agree! Many of these points are similar to the thoughts I've been having since looking into this. Addressing highly toxic or very poorly managed waste sectors makes a lot of sense. Would be interested to know more about the plastic eating bacteria

First of all - great concept and great execution. Lots of interesting information and a lucid, well-supported conclusion. 

My initial and I feel insufficiently addressed concern is that successful protests will of course be overlooked because in retrospect the technology they are protesting will seem "obviously doomed" or "not the right technology" etc. Additionally, successful protests are probably a lot shorter than the unsuccessful ones (which go on for years continuing to try to stop something that is never stopped). I'm not sure this is evidence t... (read more)

2
Charlie Harrison
Thank you!  I think your point about hindsight bias is a good one. I think it is true of technological restraint in general: "Often, in cases where a state decided against pursuing a strategically pivotal technology for reasons of risk, or cost, or (moral or risk) concerns, this can be mis-interpreted as a case where the technology probably was never viable."  I haven't discounted protests which were small – GMO campaigns and SAI advocacy were both small scale. The fact that unsuccessful protests are more prolonged might make them more psychologically available: e.g. Just Stop Oil campaigns. I'm slightly unsure what your point is here? I also agree that other examples of restraint are also relevant – particularly if public pressure was involved (like for Operation Popeye, and Boeing 2707).

I was not expecting this to be the answer. That's really fascinating. Phytomining is officially on my radar now, and I'll be linking back to this article. I hope attention to it starts taking off.

I really appreciate your insights into and estimates on this potential cause area! I have heard of using plants to identify where there are precious minerals, and to concentrate radioactive material but not literal plant mining before now.

Apologies if you covered this in the article, but can phytomining scale? Does it have the potential to be an economical answer and major source of material. Or is it more for special circumstances where mining is unusually difficult for some reason eg the mineral is highly dispersed. If you answered this already please ju... (read more)

4
Benjamin M.
I cut out a bit that I had on how much it could scale to make it shorter, but there's still a bit about that in the practical section. In general, phytomining could potentially produce the vast majority of some of the less common elements (thallium), and Krol-Sinclair and Hale say that the same is true for cobalt. It could also produce a pretty large chunk of nickel- I don't have an exact number but I'm pretty confident that it could be a double-digit percentage of the world's consumption. So yes, it scales, but figuring out how much it scales would be a good target for future research.

I read this book an enjoyed some of the information, but was not clear on its intent. Therefore your summary at the top was useful to me. I assumed it was about communicating and teaching, not inviting and inspiring. But that explains why it felt "incomplete" and I was being left hanging unexpectedly. Its an unusual book and I appreciate it for that. Still, I hope more books follow it with some more guidance on how to be better longterm thinkers and with more exercises, examples, and knowledge. Like the importance of maintenance, the rarity of successful p... (read more)

This is such a breath of fresh air. Make EA weirder!

I really want fish and bivalves to be a more prevalent and environmentally friendly option. I really appreciate you doing this write up and I expect to reference it in the future in conversation and when I have a question. Thank you so much for doing an exploration into this important and neglected topic!

I was trying to find a the big mac subsidy post and would not have been able to find it without this link post.

I'm going to flip the script a bit.

  1. Are you doing important, impactful, good things?
  2. Does EAG recognize them as novel, unexplored, needing a boost?

You are doing important impactful good things! That's what matters!! Of course recognition is important and you absolutely deserve recognition. In addition you are completely reasonable to feel bad about things you know technically shouldn't be so hurtful. But you're human and they ARE hurtful. It's okay to feel hurt. Please recognize your desires and needs. Live your best life for yourself and everyone.

EAG i... (read more)

Octopi are some of the most intelligent creatures, with a fascinatingly alien path to getting there and unrecognizable brain structure. I encourage anyone who doesn't know about octopi intelligence to look into it - they aren't social, don't teach each other skills, don't live long, and don't have centralized processing but they rank among the highest intelligence we are aware of.

Something I felt was missing from the post was a mention of how intelligent the octopi and cephalopods are which are likely to be farmed. I thought only a few species of octopi we... (read more)

4
Tessa @ ALI
Thanks so much for your support! Yes, they are miraculous creatures and fiercely intelligent. I appreciate your feedback and will certainly keep that in mind for future communications regarding this initiative.  My colleague suggested the book "The Soul of an Octopus" as a great resource for this subject matter for those who are interested. This is on my reading list for the holiday break coming up, but any additional recommendations are much appreciated! 

Very useful and illustrative. I especially like how you manage to tie both the personal perspective and the group dynamics together. I was acquainted with this idea but your write up was definitely illuminating of aspects I missed. I expect this to be useful to me and others!

I can't figure out why this didn't get more traction. This post seems extremely relevant and brought up well considered points that I'm surprised I've never encountered before. This subject seems fundamental to life changing career decisions, and highly relevant to both EA earning to give and EA career impacts. I also can't spot any surface level presentation reasons it might have gotten overlooked or prematurely dismissed.

Edit: Ah, I think what happened is it was evaluated by the suggested actions when scrolling to see the outcomes/results. I am also much... (read more)

I look forward to reading your post!
 

I'm not very involved with EA/politics but I'd be interested in hearing discussion about how to improve decision making and institution design. For example - a fundamental problem with government bodies is they seem to function well early on, when they are made up of people who believe in the goal and there is a strong unified culture. But suffer from malaise as years pass and both people and systems get entrenched to the point that the goal is secondary. Incentive alignment decays and becomes virtually nonexistent in many governmental bodies.

Of course I a... (read more)

This is great, thank you. Honestly it feels a little telling that this has barely been explored? Despite being THE x-risk? I get that the intervention point happens before it gets to this point, but knowing the problem is pretty core to prevention.

A force smarter/more powerful than us is scary, no matter what form it takes. But we (EA) feels a little swept up in one particular vision of AI timelines that doesn't feel terribly grounded. I understand its important to assume the worst, but its also important to imagine what would be realistic and then intermi... (read more)

7
Benjamin Hilton
I agree that I'd love to see more work on this! (And I agree that the last story I talk about, of a very fast takeoff AI system with particularly advanced capabilities, seems unlikely to me - although others disagree, and think this "worst case" is also the most likely outcome.) It's worth noting again though that any particular story is unlikely to be correct. We're trying to forecast the future, and good ways of forecasting should feel uncertain at the end, because we don't know what the future will hold. Also, good work on this will (in my opinion) give us ideas about what many possible scenarios will look like . This sort of work (e.g. the first half of this article, rather than the second), often feels less concrete,  but is, I think, more likely to be correct - and can inform actions that target many possible scenarios rather than one single unlikely event. All that said, I'm excited to see work like OpenPhil's nearcasting project which I find particularly clarifying and which will, I hope, improve our ability to prevent a catastrophe.
6
Robi Rahman🔸
This profile by 80k is pretty bad in terms of just glossing over all the intermediate steps and reducing it all to "But one day, every single person in the world suddenly dies." Universal Paperclips is slightly better about this, showing the process of the AI gaining our trust before betraying us, but the key power-grab step is still reduced to just "release the hypnodrones". There are other places that have fleshed out the details of how misaligned power-seeking might play out, such as Holden Karnofsky's post AI Could Defeat All Of Us Combined.

I suggest adding your anki deck to the EA anki deck list!
(I took the liberty of adding your link but didn't feel qualified to fully add an entry - please add it!)

What We Owe the Future: A Flashcard Summary
https://ankiweb.net/shared/info/1539708817

(Not my deck, but definitely an EA anki deck!)
More information here.
 

2
Stenemo
Great initiative! Are you thinking of making a "best of", with perhaps 50 most important, timeless knowledge cards? Would be great! For exempel I hope that in 50 years we don't need to know about the 2020 conflict in The Galwan Valley.

Everyone wants to live in a better world, but it's very difficult to know how. Some people will tell you the problem is greed, we don't help our neighbors, or are obsessed with materialism. But other people will tell you spirituality is part of the problem, local problems are a distraction from the big picture, and desiring things is what drives us to improve the world.

Getting everyone to believe one thing is impossible with all these different ideas of what is the right way to a better world. Everyone uniting on one belief is not even a good idea: if we a... (read more)

Since I actually did this work myself (in the US) I am going to go into too much information about my experience. Read the bolded bits if you want the summary of important points without the juicy mosquito-abatement details.

I was checking weekly anywhere we historically found mosquito larvae, including adding new locations any time another location was found - much the same as this program does: using a tablet, satellite map, and gps locations. 

I witnessed the larvae populations reducing in response in many places and in other places maintaining a hig... (read more)

6
Arnon Houri Yafin
Thank you for sharing. I recommend to try "Aquatain AMF" instead of  BVA Mineral oil. If you do try, please tell me which one was better in which context

Hi! I worked with BTI distribution and mineral oil as a solution to reducing mosquito populations in some environmentally-sensitive parts of the USA. These areas were hit badly with West Nile and started this mosquito reduction program in response. This was my first question too! As a field tech I was given biased information, but my online research agreed with the lines my environmentally-friendly company fed me:
BTI is a bacteria that only mosquitoes and 1 species of midges (in my part of the world) eat and are harmed by. The BTI ruptures their stomach an... (read more)

2
Guy Raveh
Thanks for the detailed and interesting reply! (Turns out I missed the link in the OP explaining that it's safe, but your reply is much more informative)

Some ideas that come to mind: community organizer, community safety officer, sound system setup, or other tech support, interviewing applicants, recruiter, electronics engineer, building maintenance, air filtration system installer,  bunker construction, distributing supplies in other countries, translator, earning to give, petri dish replicates, greenhouse lab tech (for drought/climate resistant crops). 

It really depends on their skills, their interest area, and in what ways they can mitigate their disadvantages. For example, if they can text to... (read more)

"I think the lack of discussion and materials and research is probably due to resource optimisation towards what people think is highest on the priority list(?)." I don't think it's as deliberate as you seem to think!

If you are talking about the forum, I think familiarity and precedent are a strong influence. (And a smidge popularity.) If you are talking about 8000h: I don't know. Maybe fewer people on the team find it compelling so they never quite get around to it? Or they think it would have less of a positive impact since there are other resources arou... (read more)

I can't say who they are, but I highly recommend this comment by them. ;)

(I suggest deleting this post if you find what you need.)

You might be interested in the theory that the evolution of morality in humans came from the invention of weapons and cooperative hunting promoting coordination and the ability of subordinates to oust unpopular leaders.  (If you haven't heard of it already)

The successful sociopolitical structure that ultimately replaced the ancestral social dominance hierarchy was an egalitarian political system in which lethal weapons made possible group control of leaders, and group success depended on the ability of leaders to persuade and of followers to contribut

... (read more)
Load more