Ah, no, I just read the report of results on Wikipedia (that's how they worded it). Hm, it's strange if that's not in the paper.
I don't suspect it to be that bad. More like some noise added to each post's score, and some posts not getting enough attention because of that.
In the reddit experiment single upvotes caused posts to have 25% higher mean score later (this effect was present in all parts of the distribution).
But the effect size was very dependent on the topic, so I'm curious how would that turn out for EA Forum.
Oh great! I didn't know about some of them.
Still, the main thing I had in mind was to embed some custom interactive stuff.
Implementing it as iframe support, would be the most general, and you would solve all the possible "embed X" suggestions at once. So it seams to be the most efficient approach.
Some use cases:
This feature is very versatile and would solve many things at once.
Check if information cascades / social influence bias is a problem on EA Forum.
If it is, maybe we could implement Emrik's idea to counter it, or some similar mechanism.
See here for the explanation of the potential problem.
To test it, we could do an experiment where some bot (or server-side process) randomly upvotes or downvotes new posts. We measure final karma after some fixed time, and see if that single vote snowballed.
I like that idea about information cascades. We could test how big this effect is on EA Forum, by having some bot who randomly upvotes or downvotes new posts, and measuring the final karma after some time.
There was a similar experiment with reddit (maybe you already know this).
The accumulating herding effect increased the comment’s mean rating by 25% compared to the control group comments (Figure 1C). Positively manipulated comments did receive higher ratings at all parts of the distribution, which means that they were also more likely to collect extremely high scores.
effect was present in the “politics,” “culture and society,” and “business” subreddits, but was not applicable for “economics,” “IT,” “fun,” and “general news”
Why do you think information cascades aren't significant on EA Forum? (I hope that's true)
Recommend posts using collaborative filtering ("people who like the same posts as you, also like:")
MVP could be done quite easily using some of these techniques.
I have some ideas how to do better. If you consider implementing this feature, hit me up to talk!
I tend to think that qualia are bound together when they causally act as one. So if left and right are highly integrated (act as one), they aren't separate experiences. So here I agree with IIT.
Ah, this story is great. In general Egan's stuff is awesome. If I remember correctly the story was more about personhood (the memories and dispositions etc.) rather than separate experiences (which would require some processes to run separately in parallel). I think it's an important distinction to make, as experience is fundamentally real, while personhood (or "continuous self") is more of a thing we assign to systems - a useful fiction (just like money, or democracy is a useful fiction).
There is also a feeling of being yourself, but that's a different thing than pure experience, and different than assigned personhood. For example there are cases (meditation and psychedelic trips) when the feeling of being someone disappears, but experience remains.
I like that soul swapping argument :D
In the case of split brain, both of the experiences would feel to be me.