I'm already working on this, and have had input from military, DRR, response, intel and CRM people on it. There are various single issue networks, but yes a civilian global response system, with surge capacity and comms teams is badly needed.

If interested to contribute and not just discuss, call me! 

NB. Please don't text or email

Michael hi and I'll try to read that. 

Just one major concern: in war and humanitarian work the INT framework may not be sufficient/ideal as in a war  you also have to factor in urgency and cascading consequences if logistics supply is not set up promptly, even before you have certainty ...

e.g. if chemical protection masks and suits don't arrive before a toxic 'accident',  many may die 

... so there is a premium on prompt action as part of Critical Pathway Planning, and fine adjustments/discussions can happen in parallel rather than in the slow deliberative way one might normally want to do.
 

How long can posts be edited for?

Are there any rules, worries or encouragements about comments?

 commenting, encouraging commenting on posts, inviting comments from experts from within EA community and outside experts, commenting on posts by colleagues, being kind to first-time posters etc?

maybe Reddit can work in a similar way?

I find the level hard work too, so I practice in Facebook groups :-) 

(I'm older than average EAs:  EA wasn't formally an available option when I was at college.)