Vernor Vinge is a legendary and recently deceased sci-fi author. I’ve just finished listening to the first two books in the Zone of Thought trilogy. Both books are entertaining and culturally influential. The audio versions are high-quality.

A Deepness in the Sky is about two spacefaring human civilizations with clashing societal structures converging on a mysterious solar system where a third, alien spider civilization is undergoing an industrial revolution. This combination of high-tech spacefaring and low-tech steampunk or fantasy shows up in both books and is one of the most compelling and unique parts of Vinge’s work. It allows him to focus on depicting rapid technological change. This is surprisingly rare in sci-fi which mostly takes the Star Wars or Trek route of depicting advanced but static technology.

Vinge also introduces the idea of “programmer archaeology” in this book. After thousands of years of advanced civilization, the free-trading Qeng Ho have enough code and schematics in their archives to solve almost any problem. The challenge is finding the right piece at the right time. Searching through the archive is a full time job. From a 2024 perspective this is evocative of prompt engineering. LLMs are these massive inscrutable matrices that in some ways reflect all of humanity’s written knowledge but digging that knowledge out of them is a non-trivial skill.

Another element with a different shine in a post-LLM world is the collectivist Emergent’s automation. The Emergents repurposed a brain-rot pandemic into a mind control/enhancement tech which allows them to create semi-human semi-robot obsessive workers called Focused. This is explicitly not AI, which the book claims would be too rigid and un-creative, but this conceit is less plausible today. The alignment problems that the Emergents face with the Focused are inadvertently relevant to the obsessive but strangely human behavior of LLMs.

A Fire Upon the Deep is a loose sequel to a Deepness in the Sky with one crossover character. It also involves a low-tech alien civilization colliding with space-faring humans (and some talking plants). The low-tech alien civilization here is really cool. The aliens essentially live in an alternate history Earth where wolves became the dominant intelligent species instead of humans. They do this by leaning into pack cooperation, leading to a hybrid hive-mind/individualistic society where each person is a hive-mind pack of 3-8 wolves but each pack is separate from all the others. Vinge spends a lot of time gaming out the biology, economics, and politics of such creatures and it is awesome.

This book also has much more explicit discussion of and interaction with super-intelligent AI. Vinge thought deeply about super-human intelligence all his life, but he saw it as so all-encompassing that writing about it directly was either boring or impossible. So A Fire Upon the Deep constrains super-intelligence with a plot device called the Zones of Thought. These are concentric spheres radiating out from the center of the galaxy that allow for successively more powerful technology as you get further out. Super-intelligent AI is only possible in the furthest zone: the Transcend. Here’s how one character describes it

The [zones below the Transcend] are like a deep of ocean, and we the creatures that swim in the abyss. We're so far down that the beings on the surface—superior though they are—can't effectively reach us. Oh, they fish, and they sometimes blight the upper levels with poisons we don't even understand. But the abyss remains a relatively safe place. And just as with an ocean, there is a constant drift of flotsam from the top. There are things that can only be made at the Top, that need close-to-sentient factories—but which can still work down here.

In real life, we’ve already crossed many of the barriers that separate “slow zone” tech from the Beyond e.g real time natural language translation and hyper-efficient and tiny micro-processing.

My favorite part of both books is Vinge weaving stories through all of the economic and political implications of advanced technology being airdropped into steampunk or pre-industrial civilizations. Highly recommend both!

9

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
I wrote this to try to explain the key thing going on with AI right now to a broader audience. Feedback welcome. Most people think of AI as a pattern-matching chatbot – good at writing emails, terrible at real thinking. They've missed something huge. In 2024, while many declared AI was reaching a plateau, it was actually entering a new paradigm: learning to reason using reinforcement learning. This approach isn’t limited by data, so could deliver beyond-human capabilities in coding and scientific reasoning within two years. Here's a simple introduction to how it works, and why it's the most important development that most people have missed. The new paradigm: reinforcement learning People sometimes say “chatGPT is just next token prediction on the internet”. But that’s never been quite true. Raw next token prediction produces outputs that are regularly crazy. GPT only became useful with the addition of what’s called “reinforcement learning from human feedback” (RLHF): 1. The model produces outputs 2. Humans rate those outputs for helpfulness 3. The model is adjusted in a way expected to get a higher rating A model that’s under RLHF hasn’t been trained only to predict next tokens, it’s been trained to produce whatever output is most helpful to human raters. Think of the initial large language model (LLM) as containing a foundation of knowledge and concepts. Reinforcement learning is what enables that structure to be turned to a specific end. Now AI companies are using reinforcement learning in a powerful new way – training models to reason step-by-step: 1. Show the model a problem like a math puzzle. 2. Ask it to produce a chain of reasoning to solve the problem (“chain of thought”).[1] 3. If the answer is correct, adjust the model to be more like that (“reinforcement”).[2] 4. Repeat thousands of times. Before 2023 this didn’t seem to work. If each step of reasoning is too unreliable, then the chains quickly go wrong. Without getting close to co
JamesÖz
 ·  · 3m read
 · 
Why it’s important to fill out this consultation The UK Government is currently consulting on allowing insects to be fed to chickens and pigs. This is worrying as the government explicitly says changes would “enable investment in the insect protein sector”. Given the likely sentience of insects (see this summary of recent research), and that median predictions estimate that 3.9 trillion insects will be killed annually by 2030, we think it’s crucial to try to limit this huge source of animal suffering.  Overview * Link to complete the consultation: HERE. You can see the context of the consultation here. * How long it takes to fill it out: 5-10 minutes (5 questions total with only 1 of them requiring a written answer) * Deadline to respond: April 1st 2025 * What else you can do: Share the consultation document far and wide!  * You can use the UK Voters for Animals GPT to help draft your responses. * If you want to hear about other high-impact ways to use your political voice to help animals, sign up for the UK Voters for Animals newsletter. There is an option to be contacted only for very time-sensitive opportunities like this one, which we expect will happen less than 6 times a year. See guidance on submitting in a Google Doc Questions and suggested responses: It is helpful to have a lot of variation between responses. As such, please feel free to add your own reasoning for your responses or, in addition to animal welfare reasons for opposing insects as feed, include non-animal welfare reasons e.g., health implications, concerns about farming intensification, or the climate implications of using insects for feed.    Question 7 on the consultation: Do you agree with allowing poultry processed animal protein in porcine feed?  Suggested response: No (up to you if you want to elaborate further).  We think it’s useful to say no to all questions in the consultation, particularly as changing these rules means that meat producers can make more profit from sel
 ·  · 11m read
 · 
My name is Keyvan, and I lead Anima International’s work in France. Our organization went through a major transformation in 2024. I want to share that journey with you. Anima International in France used to be known as Assiettes Végétales (‘Plant-Based Plates’). We focused entirely on introducing and promoting vegetarian and plant-based meals in collective catering. Today, as Anima, our mission is to put an end to the use of cages for laying hens. These changes come after a thorough evaluation of our previous campaign, assessing 94 potential new interventions, making several difficult choices, and navigating emotional struggles. We hope that by sharing our experience, we can help others who find themselves in similar situations. So let me walk you through how the past twelve months have unfolded for us.  The French team Act One: What we did as Assiettes Végétales Since 2018, we worked with the local authorities of cities, counties, regions, and universities across France to develop vegetarian meals in their collective catering services. If you don’t know much about France, this intervention may feel odd to you. But here, the collective catering sector feeds a huge number of people and produces an enormous quantity of meals. Two out of three children, more than seven million in total, eat at a school canteen at least once a week. Overall, more than three billion meals are served each year in collective catering. We knew that by influencing practices in this sector, we could reach a massive number of people. However, this work was not easy. France has a strong culinary heritage deeply rooted in animal-based products. Meat and fish-based meals remain the standard in collective catering and school canteens. It is effectively mandatory to serve a dairy product every day in school canteens. To be a certified chef, you have to complete special training and until recently, such training didn’t include a single vegetarian dish among the essential recipes to master. De
Relevant opportunities