Hide table of contents

This piece got incredibly positive feedback from the EA community, where people often experience guilt about not doing all of the things and doing them right away. In fact this might be my best-received article of all time. So I thought I'd cross-post it here for your enjoyment.

We've all been there.

'Ugh Fields' are a really useful concept. The existing explanation is written for a niche audience, so I'll have a go at explaining them myself.

The problem

Have you ever had a long-overdue task to do, a task which isn't so bad in itself, but which you can barely bring yourself to think about without feeling awful?

Most people experience this from time to time. Here's how things get to such a strange and dire state.

The first day the task is on your to-do list, you don't end up starting, because the short-term reward isn't large enough to overcome the psychological cost of doing so.

Maybe you feel low-energy. Maybe you have more urgent priorities. Maybe you're insecure about whether you can do a good job. Maybe the task involves a bit of social awkwardness. Whatever the reason - you delay.

Unfortunately, this task is one that only gets more unpleasant over time.

Maybe now you're going to have to rush and do a bad job, and you fear everyone will judge you negatively.

Or now that it's late, you feel you have to do an especially great job to make up for it. Or whenever you do send it out, the late delivery is going to embarrass you regardless. Or perhaps you're simply ashamed and annoyed with yourself that you haven't finished it already.

Either way, as time goes on, the task becomes even less appealing to work on. Even less appealing than it was the first day, when it was already bad enough that you didn't do it!

So it's now inevitable that - unless you're rescued by a day when you feel especially energetic, or a deadline that makes the costs of further delay intolerable - this is a task that you're destined to put off until you shuffle off this mortal coil.

Alright, almost everyone has experienced this horror-show of a situation.

But there's another very important thing that happens in the meantime.

Each time you think about the task, you a) don't start it, and b) feel a pang of guilt/shame/fear about your ever-more-procrastinated task. Those bad feelings usually only get worse over time, as your situation makes you feel more and more ridiculous and ashamed.

You feel so terrible, but even that's not enough to get you to start - what an embarrassment of a person you are!

As a result - and this is the interesting bit - you're constantly being negatively reinforced for even thinking about the topic.

Gradually the thing you mentally associate with this task stops being what's required to complete it. Or the reward of doing so. Or the reason you took it on in the first place.

Rather your only association becomes the flinching pain you feel whenever you accidentally remember it.

From this, your brain gradually learns that thinking about this task is the mental version of stubbing your toe. Just as your brain learns to avoid whacking your foot into things, it learns to find creative ways to prevent the task you're avoiding rising into your conscious awareness.

For instance, you'll avoid looking at your inbox, where the dreaded email awaits, or make sure your eyes never slow down long enough to read its loathsome subject line.

You'll think as little as possible about people who might remind you of the task. And whenever you do remember it you'll immediately try to focus on some other distraction instead.

After all, you won't do the task, so why suffer the pain of thinking about it, and your perpetual failure not to do it?

It's serious

While on one level this behaviour is quite funny, as a psychological phenomenon it's no joke. Most of us have had days or weeks ruined by an ugh task hanging over our head, pushed out of mind but always haunting our stream of consciousness, sitting just out of view.

In severe cases, it drives people into depressive episodes that rob them of months or years of their life.

At a social level, the ugh problem is probably getting worse due to the rise of emails and text messaging (anyone can add an unwanted to-do to your list), knowledge work (it's less clear when you've finished something or whether you've done a good job), and remote work (at no point in the week do you get to relax knowing there's no way you could be doing your ugh task right now).

And pity poor PhD students whose entire programs seem designed to make their life one enormous Ugh Field.

Limiting the damage

I don't have a perfect way to escape this mental flytrap, but these things might help:

  1. It's worth trying to see the humour in this absurd design flaw in the human brain. Ugh Fields happen to everyone, even very conscientious people.

    There's no more reason to feel ashamed about them than there is to feel ashamed that you enjoy eating food. It's just how people are built, and sadly there are no brain engineers around to roll out a patch to the human race. We just have to find practical workarounds instead.

  2. Simply recognising and labelling the Ugh Field phenomenon can make it less harmful because it provides an accurate systemic explanation for what's going on, rather than a misleading personal one like, "I'm hopeless and never get things done."

  3. Because you've been avoiding thinking about the problem, if you do think about it for a bit while keeping an open mind, you might quickly strike on a way to get out of the task entirely, or if not, do a shorter version of it.

    For example, you could email back something like: "Thanks for your patience on this. Unfortunately, I don't see how I'm going to be able to fit it into my schedule just now, is there anyone else who can take it on?"

  4. If you think about it calmly, you may well find that the task actually isn't as important as it has come to feel. The person you imagine is disgusted by your failure may only be 2/10 annoyed, or perhaps not even have noticed.

    Remember, like you, they've got plenty of their own stuff going on.

  5. Usually, by the time something is deep in an Ugh Field, it's no longer the most productive thing you could be doing anyway. Especially relative to the willpower it will now require. So consider deliberately dropping it in favour of something more motivating.

    Actively cross it off your to-do list. Throw away those New Yorkers you've been planning to read for months but never get to, or whatever else will be a nagging reminder of the task.

    You have more valuable things to do; the task is gone.

  6. Hire/ask someone else to do it.

    For example, if you're procrastinating on your taxes, maybe it's time to accept it's worth paying a professional.

    Or if you have to write an unpleasant and overdue email, get a friend or family member to draft it for you. It will likely be much less unpleasant for them because it won't be emotionally charged and marinated in shame.

  7. Ugh Fields occur more in people with depression, anxiety, ADD, and other mental health and energy issues. If they're a constant issue for you, it might be best to try tackling those underlying health and well-being issues first and foremost.

  8. There's the usual large literature on overcoming procrastination. I won't repeat it all here.

  9. Over time, learn to recognise tasks that are likely to end up in your 'Ugh Field.'

    The worst offenders are things that are kind-of unpleasant to do, get more unpleasant as you delay, and have no clear deadline or expiry date.

    Before taking on any optional responsibilities, reflect on whether they're likely to get 'Ugh Fielded.' If they will, do everything you can to steer clear of them before you even start.

  10. If you're a line manager, talk periodically with the people you're managing about whether anything at work has gotten 'Ugh Fielded.'

    If something has, don't be judgemental, simply find a way to give it to someone else.

    There are many reasons to do this: i) it probably won't get done by the original person now, ii) if it is it will be either late or bad, iii) regardless it will make them miserable in the meantime, iv) which means it's going to cost you a lot of other work they could be doing - work you'd probably value more, and v) someone else can likely do it way easier now anyhow.


Hope this helps!

If you enjoyed the above, you might also like my article A simple checklist for overcoming life and career setbacks, my podcast, or my other research for 80,000 Hours.

Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Thanks for writing the post, I found it quite useful. 

Small nit regarding 

As a result - and this is the interesting bit - you're constantly being negatively reinforced for even thinking about the topic.

I think what you're referring to is known as positive punishment. Negative reinforcement refers to the removal of an aversive outcome to increase certain behavior. 

Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
LintzA
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
Cross-posted to Lesswrong Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achi
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f