Thanks Michel!! I'll also flag that if you're interested in applying or testing your fit in policy and would like support, fill out this form to get application support
Things we can help with:
(based off of: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/pdMjPuddtHeLSBDiF/apply-to-fall-policy-internships-we-can-help)
Hi Liv! I'd just second everything everyone else said and add in that I've found EAG's very similar to EAGx's with the main difference that the attendees generally are further down the 'EA pipeline' (tend to be older, in careers based on EA principles) in case that helps :)
I'll also be there so happy to be a friendly face and help out in any way if you want!
Hi! I just wanted to say welcome and that I love the idea! I'm excited in general about it, think that it could be really promising for 'non'-EAs', and just love that you took an idea and put it into action :)
I strongly +1 the comment and really resonate with the below statement in particular.
A lot may just want someone in a position of authority to say "hey, you may not realize, but you're making people uncomfortable"
Often I've felt strange about reporting minor instances where I felt a little uncomfortable and have also been unsure along the lines 'is serious enough? is a strange vibe reportable? etc'. Especially because in many of those situations I don't think the person/people were intentionally making me uncomfortable and just unaware. But at the sa...
Hi, thanks for the comments! Some broad thoughts in response:
Re
My impression is that one of the key defenses that the Fauci/NIH/EcoHealth/etc. offered for their research in Wuhan was that it was technically not Gain of Function, even if some parts of it might sound like Gain of Function to the layperson, which seems in tension with this claim. Do you think they were wrong about this?
It's hard for me to go into detail on a public platform on this (just to be cautious to my job) but I can broadly say that there's a difference between research that is a) gain...
Thanks!! Strongly agree on your points of the intrinsic value of understanding and being nuanced in this space, I just didn't have the words to frame it as well as you put it :)
Thanks! I do broadly agree with your points. I linked reference 6 as an example of the benefits and nuances of dual-use research, but don't / shouldn't comment on COVID-19 origins and their views expressed on it.
Thanks! I don't have any other one's I broadly recommend but happy to share topic specific resources if there's something in particular you're interested in.
Hi Megan - I just wanted to say thank you for writing this. For being you. For showing up. This so well encapsulates how I and so many others are feeling. I just wanted to say thank you <3
(and i'm tired too ).
I can message you more if you want - but generally I think doing 1-1's with new-er EA's (or people who wouldn't necessarily even call themselves an EA - like people in the intro. fellowship generally) requires extra transparency and communication around expectation setting and goals.
This generally just for us looked like making it clear in the email / form what 1-1's are, what the purpose of them is, what it isn't (ex. it isn't making a career connection to simply get them to leave their job for an EA aligned one), etc. And then making it clear...
Catering can often be a lot more than $30 USD per person per meal. And it's also sometimes necessary to go with a certain catering company and meet a minimum in order to book a venue.
Many venues don't let you bring in outside food. Catering is extremely overpriced (the cost per person per meal) and oftentimes you can't sign a contract for a venue without agreeing to catering costs.
Thanks Nicole (and I'm impressed how quick you are on the write up)!! I'm so glad people enjoyed it. For other EAG / EAGx organisers - this was a great addition to our conference and was great as a tangible next step for what attendees could do to stay further engaged. Would highly recommend.
This is an amazing guide ❤️ Thank you for sharing!! I'd also be curious to see a post with more details on building the Spanish-speaking EA community (what you've done, what's been successful, etc) as a model for other community building efforts
Get everyone to stop using EA as a homogeneous group - ex. by making sure in the Intro fellowship the fact that there is no one-EA is a key point, getting people to not use that language on the Forum, etc
There should be alternatives to EAGs/EAGxs - one's that are cause area specific and/or for people interested in EA ideas but not necessarily needing to call yourself an EA.
Responding to the attention on Kathy's specific case (I'm aware I'm adding more to it) - I think we're detracting from the key argument that the EA community as a whole is neglecting to validate and support community members who experience bad things in the community
In this post, it's women and sexual assault primarily. But there are other posts (1, 2) exempifying ways the EA community itself can and should prioritise internal community health. To argue the truth of one specific example might be detracting from recognising that this...
That's a true point - but I don't a good objective. EA should strive to exist with the best, highly-aligned to doing good people and I think we need a culture the prioritises people's lived experiences, feelings, and interactions for that to happen.
I'm strongly in favour of this - it often feels like the need is to make this public so it becomes something the entire community is responsible for - as opposed to how it currently is (private and something CEA's comm health mainly is responsible for).
Your comment (at least how it's read as, maybe different from your intentions) reads as "that's a particularly problematic location, just go to a different one".
That doesn't solve the problem. That doesn't hold the Bay * or any community accountable or push for change in a positive direction. I think that sort of logic is a common response to what Maya writes about and doesn't help or make anything better.
*and this is coming from an ex-Berkeley community builder
(saying this in a friend capacity and in shock that I haven't introduced you two already) - you two should definitely talk!
Ooh sorry! I meant to add more and not be so vague and then forgot I published this and didn't edit it. I'll update it over the new few days hopefully
I'd recommend taking an Insights test if you can. I don't usually believe in all the personality test hype but we did Insights as a team at Atlas and it was super helpful (and like 95% accurate!) about each persons' working styles, communication profiles, etc. I used it to make my work with my doc
I have a long-ish list of research paper ideas on biosecurity and ethics. I'd be really helpful if there were people interested in doing some of this research or taking on projects
Edit: on hold, but thanks everyone :)
Thanks for this! I'm organising EAGxBerkeley and we have a post-EAGx plan that has some of the same stuff, but I'll try to incorporate more of your document. The main bottleneck is on my end (as an events organiser) is just people who can organising retreats and serious post-events.
Great idea! Hopefully what we're developing is also a like 'group listserv' where it will show those in EA working on bioethics / bioethics aligned into EA. Right now there's no formal place for it but if you wanted to be super proactive, feel free to start a google doc or just a running list. I can help!
This is a tricky one and I'll speak to what I know but I'm not a legal expert.
The vast majority of internships require the person to have a right to work in the U.S, so international students who have a visa status sponsored by their college or university, or are authorized to work in the U.S could intern but it depends on the place
Many Think Tanks (e.g. Brookings) allow this.
Most executive agencies do not since US citizenship is required
For Congressional offices, from what I know, theoretically yes a foreign national could intern but I don't t... (read more)