I agree with you. Yet I bristle when people who I don’t know well start putting forth arguments to me about what is good/bad for me, especially in a context where I wasn’t expecting it.
I’m much more accustomed to people thinking that moral relativism is polite, at least at first.
Moral relativism can be annoying, but putting forth strong moral positions at eg a fresher’s fair does feel like something that missionaries do.
Appreciate your comments, Aaron.
You say: But I am confident that leaders' true desire is "find people who have great epistemics [and are somewhat aligned]", not "find people who are extremely aligned [and have okay epistemics]".
I think that’s true for a lot of hires. But does that hold equally true when you think of hiring community builders specifically?
In my experience (5 ish people), leaders’ epistemic criteria seem less stringent for community building. Familiarity with EA, friendliness, and productivity seemed more salient.
I agree with you, and I think this somewhat supports the OPs concern.
Are most uni groups capable of producing or critiquing empirical work about their group, or about EA or about their cause areas of choice? Are they incentivized to do so at all?
Sometimes yes, but mostly no.
Strong +1. This feels much more like the correct use of student groups to me.
Re: “there have been cases of really great organizers springing up after just an intro fellowship.”
I definitely believe this can happen and am glad you allow for that. What makes someone seem really great — epistemics, alignment/buy-in, skill in a relevant area of study, __?
I agree and think this is an argument for investing in cause specific groups rather than generalized community building.
Would you have this same reaction if you saw Luke and Max or GWWC/CEA as equals and peers? Maybe so! It seems like you think this as the head of CEA talking down to the OP. Max and Luke seem to know each other though; I read Max’s comment as a quick flag between equals that there’s a disagreement here, but writing it on the forum instead of an email means the rest of us get to participate a bit more in the conversation too.
I am worried about alienation but I feel alienated where I currently am too so a new scene might not be much different.
I think Training for Good is in this niche.