All of Rasool's Comments + Replies

I want to signal-boost this conversation between you and @Wei Dai (and others), and see whether you have any further thoughts on the matter

2
Mo Putera
Thanks Rasool. This is sad to read.

A good recent piece on this:

https://davidoks.blog/p/a-lot-of-population-numbers-are-fake

Talking about Nigeria, Papua New Guinea, and the problems with satellite data

Karnofsky, on the Dwarkesh podcast said (emphasis mine):

I mean, you can look up our $30 million grant to OpenAI. I think it was back in 2016–– we wrote about some of the thinking behind it. Part of that grant was getting a board seat for Open Philanthropy for a few years so that we could help with their governance at a crucial early time in their development. I think some people believe that OpenAI has been net negative for the world because of the fact that they have contributed a lot to AI advancing and to AI being sort of hyped, and they think that give

... (read more)
1
Leo_
That's helpful context thanks!  This makes me think a lot of EAs just believe OpenAI as a company isn't all that important in the grand scheme AI and x-risks. As in, whether OpenAI is good or bad isn't all that relevant beacuse of how minimal the impact might be given the existing market competition and race dynamics.

I expect there is some variability, the author in this piece focuses on alcohol, which I don't know that much about, but for "Reduce unhealthy diet" (Objective 3, page 10), CEARCH did a report here, which relates to WHO's best buys (if not quite exactly matching their specified intervention), and found it to be "49,419 DALYs per USD 100,000"

For best buys in education, I recommend Rachel Glennester's 80,000 hours podcast episode, where she praises the best buys, but also criticises how education spending is done

She has a second episode, which also touches o... (read more)

Not sure if you caught it but there was a detailed critique and discussion of this 90% figure on LessWrong

2
Yarrow Bouchard 🔸
Thanks! :)

There's a transcript of the Ivan Gayton podcast, and other discussion, here

In March 2025, Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, predicted that 90% of code would be written by AI as early as June 2025 and no later than September 2025. This turned out to be dead wrong. 

Amodei claims that 90% of code at Anthropic (and some companies they work with) is being written by AI

2
Yarrow Bouchard 🔸
Turns out not even 90% of code at Anthropic is being written by AI, if you listen to Dario Amodei's full remarks. This strikes me as a pretty dishonest thing for him to say, especially since I don't know if we would have even got that important clarification if his interlocutor (Marc Benioff, the CEO of Salesforce) hadn't pressed him on it.
2
Yarrow Bouchard 🔸
His prediction was about all code, not Anthropic's code, so his prediction is still false. The article incorrectly states in the italicized section under the title (I believe it's called the deck) the prediction was about Anthropic's code, but this is what he said in March 2025: There was no qualifier that this was only about Anthropic's code. It's about all code. I'll be blunt: I think Dario saying "Some people think that prediction is wrong" is dishonest. If you make a prediction and it's wrong, you should just admit that it's wrong.

There are some interesting comments on LessWrong

2
Vasco Grilo🔸
Thanks for sharing. I did not know the post had been crossposted to LessWrong.

I have been recommended the Drone Ultimatum podcast, but haven't listened to any

I am a huge Ted Chiang fan, but your review misses one of the most amazing things about his writing -- it is written in very brief and straightforward words and sentences!

A number of his short stories are available for free online, for instance Exhalation in Lightspeed magazine. Under 'Works' on his Wikipedia page, you can find others (sometimes via web archives)

A large recent RCT found that free contraception had no impact on birth rates in Burkina Faso - I wonder if/how this affects this cause area

2
Ian Turner
Note that reduction in births is not an important KPI from GiveWell's perspective. Read their page about what they see as the benefits of contraception.

One website, which doesn't quite match all your criteria, is https://longbets.org/bets/, which has bets from people like Warren Buffet, Scott Alexander, Ray Kurzweil, and Eric Schmidt

GiveWell's cost to save a life has gone from $4,500 to a range between $3,000 and $5,500:

https://www.givewell.org/how-much-does-it-cost-to-save-a-life

From at least as early as December 2023 (possibly as early as December 2021 when the page says it was first published) until February 2024, that page highlighted a $7.2 million 2020 grant to the Against Malaria Foundation at an estimated cost per life saved of $4,500.

The page now highlights a $6.4 million 2023 grant to the Malaria Consortium at an estimated cost per life saved of $3,000.

You can see all the es... (read more)

9
Mo Putera
I wonder how they select grants to showcase on that page. They've made grants that are both much larger and more cost-effective than that, e.g. this $71.5M grant in Jan '23 to HKI's vitamin A supplementation program that they estimate would save roughly 49,000 lives at ~$1,450 per life saved after all adjustments (or ~93,000 lives at $770 per life if only adjusting for internal and external validity, or nearly 280k lives at at $260 per life saved before any adjustments, i.e. the standard I usually see in most BOTECs claiming to "beat GW top charities"...). Only thing is, this wouldn't be obvious from their original CEA because they tend to input "donation (arbitrary size)" = $100k instead of the actual grant amounts; I had to manually input their grant budget breakdown into a copy of their CEA to get the numbers above (which also means I may have done it wrong, so caveat utilitor...)

Luckily those suggestions are all useful for SEO too!

Some other things to consider (from figures like Tyler Cowen[1] and Patrick McKenzie[2] (edit: also Gwern) who talk about how their primary audience is now LLMs):

  • Prefer short paragraphs that restate names, titles, other nouns (rather than using pronouns ("he"/"she"/"it")
    • So that LLMs can lift paragraphs wholesale, and minimises errors
  • Consider what license your writing is published under
    • A more permissive license increases the likelihood of being included in training corpuses
  • Design headlines to mi
... (read more)
0
Elizabeth Álvarez
Thank you so much for this thoughtful comment, Rasool. I appreciate the references to the discussion and podcast, and I’m excited to check them out! I love how these tips deepen the connection between AEO and SEO, and highlight how writing with LLMs in mind can also improve clarity and usability for human readers. The points on a modular structure, prompt-mirroring headlines, and licensing are especially insightful. Thanks again for sharing!

You don't need to listen to podcasts as soon as they come out :) 

In fact with most media, you can wait a few weeks/months and then decide whether you actually want to read/watch/listen to it, rather than just defaulting to listening to it because it is new and shiny

In fact since you like Rob Wiblin, you can go and listen to old episodes (from another podcast) that he recommends

The largest single category of entrant to the UK is a person on a work visa; in the most recent year of data available, about 450,000 work visas were issued.[3] This is closely followed by the number of people on study visas, at 415,000. Most of the study visas are for masters level courses, rather than undergraduate courses.

Despite the near endless press coverage on asylum seekers, the number of refugee/humanitarian visas granted is small by comparison.[4] Most people who move to the UK come to work or to study.[5]

 

I believe you are downpla... (read more)

1
Lauren Gilbert
Update: I have edited, and added a footnote saying you corrected me, linking to this comment, and noting that I offered you a bug bounty.
1
Lauren Gilbert
You're correct that I accidentally used the 2023 work visa total instead of 2024 work visa total. I'll edit. As per my bug bounty policy, I'll also donate $10 to a charity of your choice: https://www.laurenpolicy.com/p/announcing-a-bug-bounty-for-this That being said, I am relatively unconcerned about the fiscal effects of this given 1) dependents are allowed to work in the UK (unlike in the US), 2) cohort wages look decent through 2023, and 3) labor force participation for non-UK born remains higher than for the UK born (through 2025). 

To anyone skimming this, this has nothing to do with former OpenAI board member Helen Toner, but rather a paper by an unrelated person with the last name Toner-Rodgers

The UK Health Secretary in 2021, Matt Hancock, ordered 100m vaccines, rather than 30m, because of the film Contagion

https://x.com/LBC/status/1356882697222836226

Dollar Cost Averaging reduces volatility

 

Investing as a lump sum supposedly beats DCA even when adjusting for risk, via the Bogleheads forum, referencing a Vanguard study

1
Dave Cortright 🔸
In most instances, people invest with a portion of each paycheck; there is no lump sum available. If you do have a lump sum and want to invest it, go for it. I stand by it for withdrawals, though. You need to have a prudent cash reserve, and liquidating on a regular schedule is a good way to do this. Or just stop reinvesting interest and dividends.

There is also this (publicly listed) talk from 2022:
 

4
Julia_Wise🔸
Also Charles Gray of the "world equity budget."
1
S
Thank you.

Note that the old[1] o3-high that was tested on ARC-AGI-1:

  1. ^

    OpenAI have stated that the newly-released o3 is not the same one as was evaluated on ARC-AGI-1 in December

1
Yarrow Bouchard 🔸
Good Lord! Thanks for this information! The Twitter thread by Toby Ord is great. Thanks for linking that. This tweet helps put things in perspective:

I subscribe to new posts from someone, and I got this in the notification dropdown

In the email notification it did have the full title in the subject

Though in the email notification, I would have liked it to have some context like "New post by a user you subscribe to: ", it just had the full post title as the subject, no other information

The Center for Global Development has a blog post from December talking about the vaccine rollout which I have been meaning to post on the EA forum with a summary and thoughts but in the meantime here is an AI-assisted overview:

Key Takeaways:

  • The Opportunity: Two new malaria vaccines (RTS,S and R21) are a major scientific breakthrough. Gavi currently plans to vaccinate 52 million children by 2030, potentially saving 180,000 lives.
  • The Gap: However, under current slow rollout plans, ~2.5 million children will still die from malaria unvaccinated by 2030. Faste
... (read more)

The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) Global Burden of Disease (GBD) often has higher estimates for Malaria deaths than the WHO.

For instance in 2021, the WHO estimated 619,000 deaths globally from Malaria, whereas IHME had 748,000

There is a comparison (and much more other interesting data) on the Our World in Data Malaria page

2
Sarah Cheng 🔸
Thanks for flagging! :) I've updated that post, and I'll record this as a low-priority bug.

Great write-up!

About the Vestergaard PFAS story, GiveWell did make a comment here

3
Paul Present
Thanks for pointing that out. I'm glad they said something, and I'm also glad that I reached the same conclusion they did.

This question has troubled me as well, plus the idea that once you get a high-impact job, if it turns out not to be a perfect fit, there are transaction costs to the organisastion replacing you with a better candidate

I don't think it's necessary for EA to denounce Musk on the basis that apart from a vague endorsement of a book a few years back and some general comments on AI safety which run in the opposite direction to his actual actions, he doesn't seem to be associated with EA at all

 

I think you are downplaying Musk's (historic) association with EA, he was a speaker at EA Global 2015, and donated at least $10m to FLI's AI safety research grants (both mentioned at this link)

4
David T
That's more than I thought, but it's also a decade ago when Elon had very different priorities, and I'm not sure that EA has any image problems associated with people thinking EAs basically want what Elon wants. (I don't think the Transgender Law Center needs to worry their name might be sullied by his donation to them in 2011 either!)

This section from Tu Youyou's Wikipedia page is incredible:

As Tu also presented at the project seminar, its preparation was described in a recipe from a 1,600-year-old traditional Chinese herbal medicine text titled Emergency Prescriptions Kept Up One's Sleeve. At first, it was ineffective because they extracted it with traditional boiling water. Tu discovered that a low-temperature extraction process could be used to isolate an effective antimalarial substance from the plant; Tu says she was influenced by the source, written in 340 by Ge Hong, which state

... (read more)

Two notification-related suggestions:

  1. I would like to be able to "middle click" on individual notifications to open them in new tabs. At the moment I believe you can only single click on them to open them in the current tab. This middle click behaviour does exist on LessWrong
  2. Related to this:

    1. Click on a new comment notification (it opens in your current tab)
    2. Scroll around on the page as you normally would
    3. Click on the bell notification icon
    4. As you hover over the notification that you originally clicked on, it shifts the focus of the page to that comment

    Is that the intended behaviour? I find it quite jarring 

2
Sarah Cheng 🔸
Thanks for flagging these! And sorry for the delayed response. :) 1. Yeah I agree with this, I threw it in our task backlog earlier but we haven't had time to fix it yet 2. Interesting! I guess this is a weird edge case with our comment linking code, I'll record this as well

What is the difference between this post and your previous one?

1
John Huang
I added some sections on counter arguments and cost benefit analysis. I also added data collected from America in One Room experiments to give you a better taste of what deliberation produces. I also brainstorm on potential programs in global development, and possibilities in randomly controlled trials, to flesh out a feasible action plan towards testing and implementation at least in the small scale.  For example, a possible plan would be to perform RCTs comparing sortition and election with respect to cash handouts in global development. But instead of giving cash to individuals, cash could be given collectively to groups, administered by  election, or sortition, or direct democracy , or perhaps a hybrid system combining many different elements. 

What about this current administration and possible TAI is the failure? Is orthogonal to American 'democracy' as outlined in the post?

2
Ozzie Gooen
It is orthogonal. More that TAI might be soon, we probably want an administration that would both promote AI safety and broadly be cooperative/humble/deliberate.

Here is an online version of the book annotated by the author:

https://deepness.trmm.net/c00b/

Screwworm is a flesh-eating maggot!

I skimmed past many posts like this, assuming that it was some kind of stomach worm, or related to the suffering of wild worms (not that I am opposed to either of those, they just don't grab my attention as strongly)

Google Sheets also has a criminally under appreciated tool - Google App Script

You can write custom code, as Javascript, and have it run on a schedule, or as a function in a spreadsheet cell, or as a clickable menu item

1
Indrek Kivirik
To add to this, combining this with LLMs is very powerful. If you describe the structure of your sheets and how you want them manipulated to ChatGPT, it will (in my experience) output hundreds of lines of code that will work on the first try. This has turned me from Just Some Guy into a capable programmer at work, it's crazy.
1
Richard Bruns
Nice, Thanks!

Re: Possible investment strategies there is a dialogue on LessWrong from November 2023 which I think still holds up. Quoting from the takeaways:


Invest like 50% of my portfolio into pretty broad index funds with really no particular specialization

  • Take like 20% of my portfolio and throw it into some more tech/AI focused index fund. Maybe look around for something that covers some of the companies listed here on the brokerage interface that is presented to me (probably do a bit more research here)
  • Invest like 3-5% of my portfolio into each of Nvidia, TSMC, Mic
... (read more)
Answer by Rasool4
0
0

Dylan Patel of Semianalysis (one of the leading semiconductor research firms) did a good recent episode on the Bg2 podcast where he covers this question and others:

Youtube link

Dexa summary

I agree with Greg that I'm not sure how causal that all was, as Vitalik says on the 80000 hours podcast:

Yeah. And when I got the Shiba tokens in 2021, I fully identified as EA then, and I was fully on board with defending the EAs against all of the various Twitter criticism. But at the same time, if you look at where I gave those donations, it was just a pretty broad spray across a bunch of things — the largest share of which basically had to do with global public health

(emphasis mine)

And as for the timing, in that same podcast episode he says:

What ended u

... (read more)
2
Jamie_Harris
I appreciate the original post and also appreciate you highlighting this useful extra info. Thanks to both!
2
Nathan Young
I find it very funny that such a huge donation basically happened by accident. Surreal stuff.

Well put! I will add that the competition includes companies like Amazon creating their own chips and others designing silicon specialised for inference (like Groq (not to be confused with xAI's model Grok))

I got an email from the IDC yesterday saying that they received "over 130 submissions" which is far fewer than I expected.

People who made a submission based on this post are a meaningful portion of all those who engaged with this process!

You might find this post interesting, which covered this and 3 other similar recent economics papers

1
gogreatergood
oh wow great find. I did not see that in searching the forum for it, as I figured the poster would include the title of the study in the text. - thank you !! happy to see someone else confirming that this is a potentially significant study, at least in UBI world.
Load more