Great work!https://snowdrift.coop is already doing this.See also: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/nBEStJvWaBjMmBa8W/rewarding-private-provision-of-public-goodsWould love to have a chat: victor(dot)s(dot)nicolaas(at)protonmail(dot)com
There is a lot of information in your post to digest, but I'll focus on what seems to me your biggest point: "public goods are treated like consumables and not investments"
The way I see it, people can consume private and public goods, just like they can invest in providers of private or public goods. If you want to invest in providers whose main purpose is to provide public goods, there are already a number of possibilities:
Perhaps you can blur the legal lines and find ways in which non-profits can reward shareholders, but I feel that is no different from:
As for whether the main mechanism you introduce holds up in practice:> If thoughtful altruists are involved in the market and either own a lot of certificates or want to buy a lot of certificates, other traders will want to predict what these “impact whales” think is impactful.I recommend chatting with https://www.linkedin.com/in/raphael-mazet/ !
Thank you for the swift reply!I was actually looking for pledges which do not list donating to EA charities as part of the pledge requirements. Apologies for not stating this context clearly enough!
Glad to see the same excitement I (and likely many others) feel about crowdsourcing platforms!
Here are more crowdfunding and coordinating platforms to learn from, look at and discuss with: https://wiki.snowdrift.coop/market-research/other-crowdfunding
Thank you for the write-up, I just published a related article on the topic today which lists other mechanisms besides quadratic funding which can potentially help grow public goods markets.Having said that, quadratic funding still gained the most traction and promise so far. In the article above I mention various adjustments which can incentivize longer-term public goods production. There also exists an adjustment to account for public bads: "negative contributions", though those created some negative sentiments in a recent experiment.
Very cool! Finally had time to read the reports. Would there be any utility in cross-posting this information in OPP's Notable Lessons (or all on Forethought) ? It should appeal to the same audience as Philanthropy's Success stories.