Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by Introduction
5 min read 1

1

Frontpage

by Ben Todd, originally on the 80,000 Hours Blog

 o 

The sole purpose of 80,000 Hours is to help you work out in which career you can make the most difference.[1]

At first sight, it’s hard to know where to begin. Or what this even means.

Indeed, many people don’t think it’s even possible to work this out! We don’t agree. However, we think that if you don’t try to weigh up your options, you’ll end up doing far less for the world than you could otherwise be doing.

How, then, do we go about helping you decide in which career can you make the most difference? It’s not an easy question, but it is a fascinating one that has a great deal of importance to the world.

What factors are the most important?

After talking one-on-one with around 100 people about their careers, asking people who have made a big impact, and thinking through what matters, we’ve developed a simple framework for assessing the value of different careers.

We expect this framework will develop significantly and become more precise over time as we come to gain a better grasp over which factors matter. It just represents our best guess at which key factors are most important, organised in a way that we’ve found relatively easy to understand and evaluate separately.

In summary, we find it useful to judge careers on two key factors:

  • Immediate Impact
  • Building career capital

We break immediate impact down further into: the size of your contribution multiplied by the effectiveness of the cause you work on.

We break career capital down into: skills, network and CV points.

In the rest of this post, I’ll go over these factors in more detail.

1) Immediate Impact

This is the immediate scope you have to make the world a better place through this career over the next couple of years.

We break this down into the multiple of two further factors: Impact = Contribution x Cause Effectiveness

a) Contribution

In some careers, you have more ability to contribute to important problems than others. Simply put, Presidents are more influential than sandwich makers. There are many ways to contribute to a cause, including:

  • Gaining a public platform and using it to spread an important idea
  • Gaining a network and using it to spread an idea or carry out a project
  • Donating money
  • Influencing budgets in existing organizations or by building a new organization
  • In addition, there’s the direct contribution you make through your work

It’s often useful to assess careers on how much contribution you’ll be able to make along each of these dimensions.

b) Cause effectiveness

To make a big difference, you’ll want to work on the problems where your contribution will go as far as possible. These are problems which are both important - worth doing something about - and tractable - it’s possible to do something about them. We call these effective causes.

The relation seems to be multiplicative. If your contribution increases by 10x, then so does your impact. Likewise with the effectiveness of your cause.

2) Building Career Capital

This is the extent to which the career path builds your general ability to take high impact opportunities in the future.

For most people, it is very hard to figure out what projects they will be working on beyond 3 – 5 years, and so we don’t find it very useful to try to evaluate the impact of these projects. Rather, we prefer to evaluate individuals’ general potential to have an impact. We call this career capital.

Your long-term general potential is often more important than your immediate impact. Most careers only peak after around 20 years[2] - you’ll be having more impact when you manage the charity rather than intern for it. Developing your career capital may be preferable to acting directly because your knowledge of which cause is most important are very likely to change.

We break down career capital into the quality of your network, skills and CV.

a) Network

Getting a job often depends on who you know. So if you know more influential people, you may have more valuable employment options. Your network can also help you to have a direct impact: it’s easier to lobby the government if you know a senator.

b) Skills

Your skills will also determine who is willing to hire you. Moreover, your skills are what you’ll use, in addition to your network, to make a difference. Because of literature on expert performance[3], we believe it is possible to develop competency in many areas with training.With training, we think it’s possible to increase your ability to get stuff done a great deal So  skill development appears very important.

c) CV Points

People will assess your job application based on your work experience and qualifications. Some jobs are prerequisites for further jobs. For instance, you won’t be considered for a career as a lawyer unless you have the right qualifications, even if you know all you need to know. Some careers or qualifications are useful as a means of signaling your ability to others. For instance, it is harder to get into finance if you have not graduated from an elite school, regardless of your true skill. These are important factors.

So in which careers can you make the most difference?

We’ve argued that keeping your options open is very important for effective altruists - probably at least comparable to your immediate impact. This suggests that building career capital, which seems to be the main way to improve your options, is at least as important as your immediate impact.

or many effective altruists, especially those at the start of their career, Sowe favor first focusing on the careers that are best for building your career, and then factoring in immediate impact.

By applying this framework in light of detailed information about various careers we have formulated the following provisional thoughts about career impact:

  • If you’re looking to build career capital, consider entrepreneurship, consulting or an economics PhD.
  • If you’re looking to pursue earning to give, consider high-end finance, tech entrepreneurship, law, consulting and medicine. These careers are all high-earning in part due to being highly demanding. Our impression is that software engineering, being an actuary and dentistry are somewhat less demanding but also highly paid.
  • If you’d like to make an impact more directly, consider party politics, founding effective non-profits, working inside international organizations, government or foundations to improve them, and doing valuable academic research.
  • If you’d like to advocate for effective causes, consider party politics, journalism, and working in international organizations, policy-oriented civil service or foundations.
  • Some career paths that look promising overall are: tech entrepreneurship, consulting, party politics, founding effective non-profits and working in international organizations.
  • Some paths we think are promising but are largely neglected by 80,000 Hours members and would like to learn more about are: party politics, working in international organizations, being a program manager at a foundation, journalism, policy-oriented civil service and marketing.[4]

Although the background information on these careers cannot be presented in this short essay, it is largely available on our website, 80000hours.org.

Footnotes

[1] This article was initially posted in July 2013 on the 80,000 Hours blog (www.80000hours.org/blog/238-how-to-assess-the-impact-of-a-career). The list of top careers was taken from Ben Todd’s post In which career can you make the most difference?, posted in February 2014 (www.80000hours.org/blog/314-in-which-career-can-you-make-the-most-difference)

[2] “Age and Outstanding Achievement”, D. Simonton, 1988, Psychological Bulletin, Vol 104, No. 2, 251-267 http://resources.emartin.net/blog/docs/AgeAchievement.pdf

[3] See a summary in this article: “Expert Performance,” Ericsson and Charness, 1994, American Psychologist http://stuff.mit.edu/afs/athena.mit.edu/course/6/6.055/readings/ericsson-charness-am-psychologist.pdf

[4] Our full evaluation of these careers is available at www.80000hours.org/blog/314-in-which-career-can-you-make-the-most-difference 

 

1

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Mentioned in

More posts like this

Comments1


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Paul Lam1
0
0

Hi Ben,

I really liked your article and I agree with you in what you say, especially in the most important factors: the immediate impact and the building career capital.

I would like to share with you some career tips that I read earlier. I think they are useful for recent graduates to maximize their chances of landing their first job after college.

Career tips for graduated

What do you want to do

Now that you have finished your studies it’s very important that you are clear about what you like and how you can work on it. Find your strengths and get the most out of them.

Focus on long-term goals

You may have to choose a first job that you don't like too much to earn some money and work experience, that's normal. However, it is important to know what you want to be in the future and guide your professional career to achieve it.

Be patient

You should not lose your enthusiasm or ambition if you do not find a job quickly. Patience is a great skill and you must learn to use it from the beginning.

Not everyone gets a job in a week, you may need more. However, if you are patient and keep trying, it is very likely that you will end up finding a job that you like.

Consider internships

Although everyone prefers a professional job right out of the box, internships can be a good option in the long run.

In the end, an internship can be seen as a work experience and could open you the doors for a paid job in the future.

Keep learning

Just because you've finished college it doesn't mean you should stop learning.  Do courses that help you improve your CV and increase your chances of getting a job.

Additionally, you may end up finding a half-time job that allows you to gain experience and money while continuing to learn.

Reply
More from Introduction
79
All Animals Are Equal
Introduction
· · 3m read
3
3
View more
Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
LewisBollard
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
> How the dismal science can help us end the dismal treatment of farm animals By Martin Gould ---------------------------------------- Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- This year we’ll be sharing a few notes from my colleagues on their areas of expertise. The first is from Martin. I’ll be back next month. - Lewis In 2024, Denmark announced plans to introduce the world’s first carbon tax on cow, sheep, and pig farming. Climate advocates celebrated, but animal advocates should be much more cautious. When Denmark’s Aarhus municipality tested a similar tax in 2022, beef purchases dropped by 40% while demand for chicken and pork increased. Beef is the most emissions-intensive meat, so carbon taxes hit it hardest — and Denmark’s policies don’t even cover chicken or fish. When the price of beef rises, consumers mostly shift to other meats like chicken. And replacing beef with chicken means more animals suffer in worse conditions — about 190 chickens are needed to match the meat from one cow, and chickens are raised in much worse conditions. It may be possible to design carbon taxes which avoid this outcome; a recent paper argues that a broad carbon tax would reduce all meat production (although it omits impacts on egg or dairy production). But with cows ten times more emissions-intensive than chicken per kilogram of meat, other governments may follow Denmark’s lead — focusing taxes on the highest emitters while ignoring the welfare implications. Beef is easily the most emissions-intensive meat, but also requires the fewest animals for a given amount. The graph shows climate emissions per tonne of meat on the right-hand side, and the number of animals needed to produce a kilogram of meat on the left. The fish “lives lost” number varies significantly by
Relevant opportunities
27
Apply to the Cambridge ERA:AI Fellowship 2025
Harrison 🔸
· · 3m read
0
0
19
Evals projects I'd like to see, and a call to apply to OP's evals RFP
cb
· · 4m read
2
2
7
EAGxNordics in Norway: apply now
Amalie Farestvedt 🔸
· · 3m read
0
0
View more