Effective altruism is a joint effort. Our goal is to make the EA Forum the central place for collaborative discussion about how to do the most good we can.
What we’re aiming for
- Writing that is accurate, kind, and relevant to the discussion at hand.
- Scout mindset: “The drive not to make one idea win or another lose, but to see what’s there as honestly and accurately as you can.”
- Clarity about what you believe, your reasons for believing it, and what would cause you to change your mind.
- Making concrete predictions where possible.
- Summary articles: Distilling previous ideas and debates can be really useful, because it allows people to get up to speed quickly and build on previous knowledge.
We don’t worry much about:
- Polish: We’d rather hear an idea that’s presented imperfectly than not hear it at all.
We discourage (and may delete):
- Unnecessary rudeness or offensiveness
- Materials advocating major harm or illegal activities
- Other behavior that interferes with good discourse
- When you disagree with someone, approach it with curiosity: try to work out why they think what they think, and what you can learn from each other.
- When you criticize someone’s point, consider doing so supportively.
- Keep an eye out for ways you might be biased — ideologies, people, or causes that you’re particularly attached to.
- Try to focus on important questions, and the important parts of important questions to keep content useful and to the point.
- You can flag material that you think is inappropriate for the site, and the moderators will take a look.
This is the space for most material about how to do good effectively.
Select the “Daily” section to see posts in all categories, sorted chronologically.
This is the place for posts about the EA community itself (including EA organizations) rather than object-level discussion.
Love someone’s work? Click their username and you’ll see the option to “subscribe to this user’s posts.” You’ll see their new posts in your notification area.
You can make a new post by clicking on your username in the upper right and selecting “new post.”
Personal blog post
By default, your posts will be published to your personal blog. Other users can follow your blog if they wish, and they’ll see notifications when you post.
You can use posts to jot quick ideas or questions, to publish polished research, or anything in between.
A post will be more visible to other users as it gets more upvotes. If it’s upvoted enough, or if moderators curate it, it will appear on the frontpage.
We encourage you to post links to content from other sites. You can do this by selecting the link icon when you go to make a new post. When you post links, please either quote or write a summary of the content to get discussion going.
If you’re writing about the EA community itself, giving an organizational update, or discussing specific strategies for community building, your post will be moved to the “Community” section.
When you vote articles up and down, you give the users karma points. The karma points are equal to the number of upvotes minus the downvotes, and by default, the higher rated posts are more visible. The karma is the number shown next to each post or comment.
You don’t need any karma to post, comment, or vote.
You can vote up or down on posts and comments. For content you think is especially good or bad, you can give a “strong upvote” or “strong downvote” by clicking and holding (on a computer) or double-tapping (on mobile). The strength of your votes is affected by your level of karma; more details here.
You are encouraged to also leave constructive feedback about what was helpful or unhelpful about the material you’re voting on:
“That example helped clear things up for me.”
“I didn’t find this relevant.”
“Mass voting” on large portions of a user’s content simply because it belongs to that user is not acceptable. Please judge each post or comment on its own merits.
Aside from mass voting, you can vote using any other criteria you choose. If it helps, you could consider these recommendations from a forum which uses the same voting system. Here’s an edited excerpt:
Conversational Flow (normal votes): Use normal votes when you like (or dislike) the effect a comment has on a conversation.
- “Ah, good point.” (+)
- “Hmm. This gives me something to think about.” (+)
- “Thanks for citing your sources!” (+)
- “I think this contains an error.” (-)
- “This is technically fine, but annoying to read.” (-)
- “I don’t think you’re being very charitable.” (-)
Important Content (strong votes): Use strong votes when you think other people should go out of their way to read something (or definitely avoid it).
- “I learned something new and useful.” (++)
- “The argumentation or thought process here improved the way I think.” (++)
- “This contains many factual errors or a lot of bad reasoning.” (--)
- “This is literally spam.” (--)
Let other users know more about you. To edit your user profile, click your username in the upper right and select “Profile.”
It’s fine to make a pseudonymous account in order to express views you wish to keep anonymous. It’s not acceptable to vote multiple times on the same material, to use multiple accounts to express the same opinion multiple times, or to impersonate other people.
Currently (as of March 2019), moderators are Denise Melchin, Aaron Gertler, and Julia Wise, and the moderation team uses the email address firstname.lastname@example.org. Please feel free to contact us with questions or feedback.
Moderators can access
- The IP address a post/comment came from
- Voting history of users
- Identity of voters on any given post/comment
This information will only be used to identify behavior such as “sockpuppet” accounts and mass downvoting. The moderators will not view or use this information for any other purpose.
If you notice a bug, have a question about using the Forum, or want to offer a suggestion, you can reach our support team using Intercom (the blue chat box on your screen). You can also email the team at email@example.com.