UPDATE: I now consider my 2022 Interested in EA/longtermist research careers? Here are my top recommended resources a better starting point than this older post, but this post might be useful after you've read that 2022 one.
Cross-posted to LessWrong.
I've had calls with >30 people who are interested in things like testing their fit for EA-aligned research careers, writing on the Forum, "getting up to speed" on areas of EA, etc. (This is usually during EA conferences.)Â
I gradually collected a set of links and notes that I felt that many such people would benefit from seeing, then turned that into a Google Doc. Many people told me they found that doc useful, so I'm now (a) sharing it as a public post, and (b) still entertaining the hypothesis that those people were all just vicious liars and sycophants, of course.Â
Disclaimers
- Not all of these links/notes will be relevant to any given person
- These links/notes are most relevant to people interested in (1) research roles, (2) roles at explicitly EA organisations, and/or (3) longtermism
- But this just because that’s what I know best
- There are of course many important roles that aren’t about research or aren’t at EA orgs!
- And I'm happy with many EAs prioritising cause areas other than longtermism
- But, in any case, some of the links/notes will also be relevant to other people and pathways
- This doc mentions some orgs I work for or have worked for previously, but the opinions expressed here are my own, and I wrote the post (and the doc it evolved from) in a personal capacity
Regarding writing, the Forum, etc.
- Why you (yes, you) should post on the EA Forum (a talk by Aaron Gertler)
- How you can make an impact on the EA Forum (another talk by Aaron Gertler)
- Feedback available for EA Forum drafts (a post by that Aaron Gertler guy I've been hearing so much about lately)
- Effective Altruism Editing and Review
- Reasoning Transparency
- This has great writing tips that definitely apply on the Forum, and ideally would apply everywhere, but unfortunately they don’t perfectly align with the norms in some areas/fields
- Readings and notes on how to write/communicate well
- Reasons for and against posting on the EA Forum
- Regarding types of writing you can do:
- Write about any of the research ideas in the links in the next section
- Write summaries and/or collections
- Write book reviews (see Buck's suggestion, my suggestion, and posts tagged books)
- "deep dive into seminal papers/blog posts and attempt to identify all the empirical and conceptual errors in past work, especially writings by either a) other respected EAs or b) other stuff that we otherwise think of as especially important." (see Linch's shortform)
- I also encourage you to consider reading, commenting, and posting on LessWrong
- Sometimes people worry that a post idea might be missing some obvious, core insight, or just replicating some other writing you haven't come across. I think this is mainly a problem only inasmuch as it could've been more efficient for you to learn things than slowly craft a post.
- So if you can write (a rough version of) the post quickly, you could just do that.
- Or you could ask around or make a quick Question post to outline the basic idea and ask if anyone knows of relevant things you should read.
Research ideas
Programs
Not all of these things are necessarily "open" right now.Â
Here are things I would describe as research training programs (in alphabetical order to avoid picking favourites):
Note: I know less about what the opportunities at the Center for Reducing Suffering and the Nonlinear Fund would be like than I know about what the other opportunities would be like, so I'm not necessarily able to personally endorse those two opportunities.Â
Other things
Getting “up to speed” on EA, longtermism, x-risks, etc.
Other
I'd welcome comments suggesting other relevant links, or just sharing people's own thoughts on any of the topics addressed above!
I definitely agree that one of the best things applicants interested in roles at organizations like ours can do to improve their odds of being a successful researcher is to read and write independent research for this forum and get feedback from the community.
I think another underrated way to acquire a credible and relevant credential is to become a top forecaster on Metaculus, Good Judgement Open, or Facebook’s Forecastapp.