In general, people are paid more when their work is highly valuable and scarce. Is this still true within the EA non-profit space? I'd imagine this data is harder to interpret because successful wages often require paying people enough to get them to work for a non-profit rather than a for-profit company. Also, different cause areas receive different amounts of funding, which might make this tricky. Still, if I'm doing career research to find high-impact jobs, would this be a good thing for me to look at?