Hide table of contents

In this post I reflect upon my participation in the first round of the Roote.co online fellowship program. The Roote Fellowship aims to transmit systems level thinking skills and catalyze positive change.

Disclaimer: I did not pay for participation in the fellowship program but agreed to write a review about my fellowship experience.

Introduction

Roote.co is the brainchild of Rhys Lindmark who is an educator and entrepreneur in the tech scene. For instance, he has taught Blockchain Ethics at MIT, written blog posts on a variety of topics, and hosts a regular podcast with guests mostly from the broader tech scene. The main promise of the fellowship program is to be an intensive 6 week experience aimed at catalyzing the individual projects of the participants. Specifically, the fellowship combines 5 weeks of lectures and discussion meetings with individual work on personal projects that ought to be informed by the materials covered in the lectures. In week 6 there is a demo day where the projects are showcased to the whole group. The fellowship is organized via Slack to encourage interaction between participants. The price for the fellowship is currently set at $ 2,000 but discounts for people who cannot afford this kind of money are available.

Personal Background

Before describing my experience in the Roote Fellowship, I will quickly introduce myself so that you can get a sense of where my assessment is coming from.

I am a PhD student in information systems at the University of Cologne in Germany. As part of my PhD work, I have deeply engaged with problem solving methodology and science informed social change methods such as Prosocial. Moreover, for several years now, I am involved in the EA community, for instance, I help organize a local group in Cologne, I have attended several EA conferences (EAG and EAGx), I co-founded the “Netzwerk für Effektiven Altruismus Deutschland” and I am currently working for Effektiv Spenden, a German donation platform for effective charities (self-serving pitch: we are fundraising at the moment, check us out!).

My motivation for participating in the Roote Fellowship was simple, as part of my academic career development, I have developed a university course on problem solving for the 21st century, which was a first for me. Thus, when I heard about the Roote Fellowship, I thought I would be a great candidate that could a) learn from how other people approach the topic and teach problem solving techniques, and b) give feedback about my experience of the course. When I contacted Rhys with this idea, he was happy to have me audit the course and waive the participation fee, given my tight financial situation as a PhD student.

Experience

For me the fellowship started with a first “getting-to-know” call with Rhys that was aimed at seeing if the fellowship would be a good fit for me. I really appreciated this call and was inspired by the way Rhys took an interest in what I was working on and actually asked probing questions to test his own understanding of my ideas and plans. The main goal for the call was to identify the personal project I would be working on during the fellowship. For me this was a side project that I was already pursuing, focused on developing a digital platform to identify and disseminate solutions for practitioner problems. Rhys seemed happy with that project and eager to support me in developing it.

After this first interaction, there was some silence until the fellowship started. Then, we had weekly calls to discuss the materials covered in video lectures of the content as well as any issues we might have. The calls were well organized and never felt like they wasted my time. For instance, there were many break out sessions to discuss questions, which made time fly by. They were also a great opportunity to get to know the other participants and learn from their perspectives. I was really presently surprised by the type of people the fellowship attracted.

In terms of the lectures, the topics covered were the following:

  • Week 1: Systems and Paradigms
  • Week 2: Networkism
  • Week 3: Coherent Pluralism
  • Week 4: Bentoism
  • Week 5: Generosity

I felt that this content was very much informed by Rhys personal perspective and, thus, a pretty subjective take on the world. This is not to say that the content is not informative, it’s just important to keep in mind that the content covered is likely not “the” solution to seeing and understanding the world. In sum, the content is more tailored to people who are looking for an illustrative and plausible account to make sense of the world rather than a comprehensive or scientific treatment of all plausible perspectives. In terms of the personal project, most of that seemed to be up to us. I invested a little more time in my side project than I otherwise would have but not by much. Moreover, I didn’t really see how the content from the lectures really connected to or helped me with my project. What did help on the other hand, was networking and discussing ideas with other like minded people as part of the fellowship. Also Rhys is a great person to get feedback from, I felt a genuine interest in wanting to help improve the project. I hope that these aspects of peer feedback will be further emphasized in future iterations of the fellowship program.

Demo day then revealed the broad spectrum of topics covered by fellowship participants and a wide range of effectiveness in getting things done. One participant basically launched a whole fintech startup and was involved in funding discussions within the 6 weeks while others planned a project and wrote a blog post about the progress. Needless to say seeing other people’s projects and progress was interesting and motivating. Overall, I felt medium happy with the progress that I could present on my project. In retrospect, it seems like my personal benefit would have been higher if I would have had (or taken) more time for my project.

Takeaways

To be completely honest, I don’t feel like I learned deep new or novel insights BUT I was already deeply engaged in the exact kind of content that the course was trying to teach. Thus, my experience is likely not to confer to people who are new to systems thinking or don’t know what paradigms are. Indeed, I think that the course offered an easy way to get into those topics without the risk of becoming overwhelmed.

Conclusion

As I am writing this post for the EA community, I would be remiss if I didn’t conclude with some reference to the cost-effectiveness of this program. Was it worth it? While I only have the reference of my own experience, I can say that for me I would say it was a reasonable investment of my time given the situation I was in (i.e., wanting to learn how other people teach such material) and the money that I spent on it (i.e., I got to audit the course for free). A more general assessment seems difficult, given that a) I participated in the very first installment of the fellowship and things might change, b) I don’t have any data about other participants' assessments. However, what I can say is that Rhys is a great guy and it seems fruitful to connect with him if you are interested in the topics covered in the fellowship. After all isn’t that what the EA community should be all about? Let’s support each other to make this world a better place :)

11

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
sawyer🔸
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
Note: This started as a quick take, but it got too long so I made it a full post. It's still kind of a rant; a stronger post would include sources and would have gotten feedback from people more knowledgeable than I. But in the spirit of Draft Amnesty Week, I'm writing this in one sitting and smashing that Submit button. Many people continue to refer to companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind as "frontier AI labs". I think we should drop "labs" entirely when discussing these companies, calling them "AI companies"[1] instead. While these companies may have once been primarily research laboratories, they are no longer so. Continuing to call them labs makes them sound like harmless groups focused on pushing the frontier of human knowledge, when in reality they are profit-seeking corporations focused on building products and capturing value in the marketplace. Laboratories do not directly publish software products that attract hundreds of millions of users and billions in revenue. Laboratories do not hire armies of lobbyists to control the regulation of their work. Laboratories do not compete for tens of billions in external investments or announce many-billion-dollar capital expenditures in partnership with governments both foreign and domestic. People call these companies labs due to some combination of marketing and historical accident. To my knowledge no one ever called Facebook, Amazon, Apple, or Netflix "labs", despite each of them employing many researchers and pushing a lot of genuine innovation in many fields of technology. To be clear, there are labs inside many AI companies, especially the big ones mentioned above. There are groups of researchers doing research at the cutting edge of various fields of knowledge, in AI capabilities, safety, governance, etc. Many individuals (perhaps some readers of this very post!) would be correct in saying they work at a lab inside a frontier AI company. It's just not the case that any of these companies as
 ·  · 11m read
 · 
My name is Keyvan, and I lead Anima International’s work in France. Our organization went through a major transformation in 2024. I want to share that journey with you. Anima International in France used to be known as Assiettes Végétales (‘Plant-Based Plates’). We focused entirely on introducing and promoting vegetarian and plant-based meals in collective catering. Today, as Anima, our mission is to put an end to the use of cages for laying hens. These changes come after a thorough evaluation of our previous campaign, assessing 94 potential new interventions, making several difficult choices, and navigating emotional struggles. We hope that by sharing our experience, we can help others who find themselves in similar situations. So let me walk you through how the past twelve months have unfolded for us.  The French team Act One: What we did as Assiettes Végétales Since 2018, we worked with the local authorities of cities, counties, regions, and universities across France to develop vegetarian meals in their collective catering services. If you don’t know much about France, this intervention may feel odd to you. But here, the collective catering sector feeds a huge number of people and produces an enormous quantity of meals. Two out of three children, more than seven million in total, eat at a school canteen at least once a week. Overall, more than three billion meals are served each year in collective catering. We knew that by influencing practices in this sector, we could reach a massive number of people. However, this work was not easy. France has a strong culinary heritage deeply rooted in animal-based products. Meat and fish-based meals remain the standard in collective catering and school canteens. It is effectively mandatory to serve a dairy product every day in school canteens. To be a certified chef, you have to complete special training and until recently, such training didn’t include a single vegetarian dish among the essential recipes to master. De
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
 The Life You Can Save, a nonprofit organization dedicated to fighting extreme poverty, and Founders Pledge, a global nonprofit empowering entrepreneurs to do the most good possible with their charitable giving, have announced today the formation of their Rapid Response Fund. In the face of imminent federal funding cuts, the Fund will ensure that some of the world's highest-impact charities and programs can continue to function. Affected organizations include those offering critical interventions, particularly in basic health services, maternal and child health, infectious disease control, mental health, domestic violence, and organized crime.
Relevant opportunities