Hide table of contents

The new year brings some big news for EAJ: the departure of our first Managing Director, and an exciting new leader for our organization. Read on for our appreciation of our outgoing MD, Hillel, and to learn more about our incoming MD, Sam, and how you can get involved. Wishing everyone in our community a shana tova, a good year to come - We hope it is filled with personal growth as well as growth in our capacity to do justice in the world!

A Fond Farewell to EAJ’s first Managing Director, Hillel Ehrenreich

Feeling more than a bit verklempt but also full of nachas, we would like to share that our first Managing Director, Hillel, has left EAJ to start his next chapter as a 1L at Harvard Law School.

From the moment Hillel stepped into the role of Managing Director, he's been a true mensch, pouring his heart and soul into growing EAJ from its nascent stages to the thriving community it is today. Under his leadership, we've seen EAJ transform from a disorganized collection of volunteers with little real-world impact into a lean and effective organization that embodies Jewish values of rigorous study and tikkun olam and EA values of truth-seeking and taking concrete steps to help others effectively.

Let's take a moment to kvell about some of Hillel's remarkable achievements. With the help of our volunteers, program participants, board, and the wider EAJ community, Hillel:

  1. Launched and nurtured our flagship 8-week fellowship program that fostered deeper engagement with Jewish texts and EA concepts among the many participants--a significant portion of whom have made significant career, donation, or other changes after participating.
  2. Cultivated a robust network, connecting participants with impactful opportunities and resources, leading to significant career changes and increased positive impact.
  3. Introduced EA principles to new Jewish audiences through engaging Shabbat dinners, thought-provoking talks, and partnerships with Jewish organizations.
  4. Secured continued funding from EA Infrastructure Fund allowing us to reach hundreds of new people with compelling programming.

Hillel, your dedication to tikkun olam through the lens of EA has been nothing short of inspiring. You've shown us that combining Jewish values with EA principles can create a powerful force for good in the world.

As you depart our scrappy, small, and obscure institution for yet another one--"Harvard Law School" (is it even accredited? Oy vey!)--know that you're leaving EA for Jews with a strong foundation and a community bursting with potential. We have no doubt that you'll bring the same passion, intellect, and chutzpah to your studies that you've brought to our organization, and that you’ll always remember as we read in Ethics of our Fathers, that we study for the sake of action in the world.

To our beloved outgoing Managing Director, we say: Mazel Tov on your next chapter! May you continue to go from strength to strength, and don't forget to call your mother (and us) once in a while.

With gratitude and best wishes,

The EA for Jews Board and Community

PS -- wondering who will take the helm? Read on...

A warm welcome to EAJ’s new Managing Director, Sam Roth

We are pleased to announce that we have selected Sam Roth as the next Managing Director of EAJ!

Sam is an alum of EAJ's intro fellowship program who is excited to bring his talents to help develop and expand the fellowship and other impactful programming. He has a professional background in behavioral science as well as political organizing, particularly in upstart settings.

Sam traces his interest in public affairs back to his Jewish upbringing that stressed values of doing good and social justice, values that naturally sparked an interest in the effective altruism community when he was in college and continuing into his early career. He holds bachelor's and master's degrees in public policy from the University of Chicago, reflecting his commitment to rigorous thinking about the best pathways to social impact. Having served in several capacities as a teacher, tutor, and mentor, Sam is passionate about helping others learn and realize their potential to make an impact, a passion that he looks forward to putting into practice every day working with the fabulous EAJ community.

Originally from Chicago, Sam currently lives in Washington, DC with his partner Samy (yes, it gets confusing…) and their dog Tsunami. Outside of work, he enjoys playing guitar, exploring plant-based cooking, and spending time with family and friends. He also "enjoys" being a tortured fan of the Chicago Bears and New York Mets. He is eager to get to know the EAJ community better and is always happy to discuss EA, Jewish culture, music, sports, or anything else!  

Sam is currently wrapping up his prior work and will begin working full time for EAJ a bit after the High Holidays. He is excited to meet our vibrant community and hear your ideas and ways you would like to be involved -- stay tuned for an announcement of his office hour sand in the meantime reach out to him at eaforjews@gmail.com.

The EA for Jews Board

Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Congrats Hillel, Sam and EAJ! Looking forward to what's next.

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
(Audio version here, or search for "Joe Carlsmith Audio" on your podcast app.) > “There comes a moment when the children who have been playing at burglars hush suddenly: was that a real footstep in the hall?”  > > - C.S. Lewis “The Human Condition,” by René Magritte (Image source here) 1. Introduction Sometimes, my thinking feels more “real” to me; and sometimes, it feels more “fake.” I want to do the real version, so I want to understand this spectrum better. This essay offers some reflections.  I give a bunch of examples of this “fake vs. real” spectrum below -- in AI, philosophy, competitive debate, everyday life, and religion. My current sense is that it brings together a cluster of related dimensions, namely: * Map vs. world: Is my mind directed at an abstraction, or it is trying to see past its model to the world beyond? * Hollow vs. solid: Am I using concepts/premises/frames that I secretly suspect are bullshit, or do I expect them to point at basically real stuff, even if imperfectly? * Rote vs. new: Is the thinking pre-computed, or is new processing occurring? * Soldier vs. scout: Is the thinking trying to defend a pre-chosen position, or is it just trying to get to the truth? * Dry vs. visceral: Does the content feel abstract and heady, or does it grip me at some more gut level? These dimensions aren’t the same. But I think they’re correlated – and I offer some speculations about why. In particular, I speculate about their relationship to the “telos” of thinking – that is, to the thing that thinking is “supposed to” do.  I also describe some tags I’m currently using when I remind myself to “really think.” In particular:  * Going slow * Following curiosity/aliveness * Staying in touch with why I’m thinking about something * Tethering my concepts to referents that feel “real” to me * Reminding myself that “arguments are lenses on the world” * Tuning into a relaxing sense of “helplessness” about the truth * Just actually imagining differ
Garrison
 ·  · 7m read
 · 
This is the full text of a post from "The Obsolete Newsletter," a Substack that I write about the intersection of capitalism, geopolitics, and artificial intelligence. I’m a freelance journalist and the author of a forthcoming book called Obsolete: Power, Profit, and the Race to build Machine Superintelligence. Consider subscribing to stay up to date with my work. Wow. The Wall Street Journal just reported that, "a consortium of investors led by Elon Musk is offering $97.4 billion to buy the nonprofit that controls OpenAI." Technically, they can't actually do that, so I'm going to assume that Musk is trying to buy all of the nonprofit's assets, which include governing control over OpenAI's for-profit, as well as all the profits above the company's profit caps. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman already tweeted, "no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want." (Musk, for his part, replied with just the word: "Swindler.") Even if Altman were willing, it's not clear if this bid could even go through. It can probably best be understood as an attempt to throw a wrench in OpenAI's ongoing plan to restructure fully into a for-profit company. To complete the transition, OpenAI needs to compensate its nonprofit for the fair market value of what it is giving up. In October, The Information reported that OpenAI was planning to give the nonprofit at least 25 percent of the new company, at the time, worth $37.5 billion. But in late January, the Financial Times reported that the nonprofit might only receive around $30 billion, "but a final price is yet to be determined." That's still a lot of money, but many experts I've spoken with think it drastically undervalues what the nonprofit is giving up. Musk has sued to block OpenAI's conversion, arguing that he would be irreparably harmed if it went through. But while Musk's suit seems unlikely to succeed, his latest gambit might significantly drive up the price OpenAI has to pay. (My guess is that Altman will still ma
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
When we built a calculator to help meat-eaters offset the animal welfare impact of their diet through donations (like carbon offsets), we didn't expect it to become one of our most effective tools for engaging new donors. In this post we explain how it works, why it seems particularly promising for increasing support for farmed animal charities, and what you can do to support this work if you think it’s worthwhile. In the comments I’ll also share our answers to some frequently asked questions and concerns some people have when thinking about the idea of an ‘animal welfare offset’. Background FarmKind is a donation platform whose mission is to support the animal movement by raising funds from the general public for some of the most effective charities working to fix factory farming. When we built our platform, we directionally estimated how much a donation to each of our recommended charities helps animals, to show users.  This also made it possible for us to calculate how much someone would need to donate to do as much good for farmed animals as their diet harms them – like carbon offsetting, but for animal welfare. So we built it. What we didn’t expect was how much something we built as a side project would capture peoples’ imaginations!  What it is and what it isn’t What it is:  * An engaging tool for bringing to life the idea that there are still ways to help farmed animals even if you’re unable/unwilling to go vegetarian/vegan. * A way to help people get a rough sense of how much they might want to give to do an amount of good that’s commensurate with the harm to farmed animals caused by their diet What it isn’t:  * A perfectly accurate crystal ball to determine how much a given individual would need to donate to exactly offset their diet. See the caveats here to understand why you shouldn’t take this (or any other charity impact estimate) literally. All models are wrong but some are useful. * A flashy piece of software (yet!). It was built as
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
2