Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by EAvalues🔸
2 min read 1

5

Building effective altruismCommunityAnnouncements and updatesEffective altruism cultureOpinion
Frontpage

We’re excited to announce the start of the EA Values Project—an initiative designed to promote, develop, and integrate the core values of Effective Altruism (EA) across our community, workplaces, and individual commitments.

Why This Project?

We believe as the EA movement grows, maintaining clarity and alignment on our core values is crucial especially with the speed of technological developments and AI. By strengthening our understanding and practice of EA core values and principles, we can ensure that our efforts, decisions and actions remain effective, evidence-based, aligned with doing the most good, and grounded in our human values.

Current EA Core Values and Principles

There are four values at the heart of effective altruism (Prioritisation, Impartial altruism, Open truth-seeking, and Collaborative spirit. The Center for Effective Altruism identifies these current Guiding Principles of Effective Altruism (Commitment to others, Scientific mindset, Openness, Integrity, Collaborative Spirit) and these Core Central Principles of Effective Altruism (Scope sensitivity, Impartiality, Scout mindset, and Recognition of tradeoffs).

These are just some organizations who have similar core values and principles and whose members in the organizations are part of the Effective Altruism communities. We believe that our human core values play an important role in our decisions and our commitment to continue working at impactful organizations and in helping others and our world. More than our effectiveness, our human value of altruism is just as important and if our mind, skills and values are nurtured and developed together, it would allow us to be truly impactful in our work and in our lives.

Project Goals

Just as Effective Altruism is the project of trying to find the best ways of helping others, and putting them into practice, the EA Values Project aims to continuously remind and help in the formation of the human values that shape our decisions and actions in helping others.

  1. Community Engagement: Organizing discussions, workshops, and events to deepen understanding, importance, need, and application of EA values.
  2. Workplace Integration: Encouraging organizations aligned with EA to actively incorporate core values and principles into decision-making.
  3. Education and Training Tools: Developing resources for individuals and organizations to assess and align their actions with EA core values.
  4. Accountability & Feedback: Creating mechanisms for the community to provide tools, input and stories on how well we uphold these values.
  5. Continuous development: We expect EA core values and principles to change over time as our world, the technology, and AI improves. We hope the project continuous to be a resource in promoting, developing and improving EA core values and principles.

How You Can Get Involved

  • Contribute Ideas: Share stories, experiences, and insights on how to strengthen EA values and principles in our work and lives. We hope to share in the EA forum regular stories and experiences of individuals and organizations about EA core values and principles.
  • Help the Project: We hope the project will develop in the future to be an organization that can provide training and formation programs to EA related organizations and groups. Feel free to share your suggestions and ideas to help us improve this project.

This project is a collaborative effort, and we welcome feedback, contributions, and suggestions. Feel free to comment or email us. Let’s continue to work, share stories and experiences about the human values that helps EA remain a principled and high-impact movement.

5

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments1


Sorted by
New & upvoted
Click to highlight new comments since:
Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f
LewisBollard
 ·  · 8m read
 · 
> How the dismal science can help us end the dismal treatment of farm animals By Martin Gould ---------------------------------------- Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- This year we’ll be sharing a few notes from my colleagues on their areas of expertise. The first is from Martin. I’ll be back next month. - Lewis In 2024, Denmark announced plans to introduce the world’s first carbon tax on cow, sheep, and pig farming. Climate advocates celebrated, but animal advocates should be much more cautious. When Denmark’s Aarhus municipality tested a similar tax in 2022, beef purchases dropped by 40% while demand for chicken and pork increased. Beef is the most emissions-intensive meat, so carbon taxes hit it hardest — and Denmark’s policies don’t even cover chicken or fish. When the price of beef rises, consumers mostly shift to other meats like chicken. And replacing beef with chicken means more animals suffer in worse conditions — about 190 chickens are needed to match the meat from one cow, and chickens are raised in much worse conditions. It may be possible to design carbon taxes which avoid this outcome; a recent paper argues that a broad carbon tax would reduce all meat production (although it omits impacts on egg or dairy production). But with cows ten times more emissions-intensive than chicken per kilogram of meat, other governments may follow Denmark’s lead — focusing taxes on the highest emitters while ignoring the welfare implications. Beef is easily the most emissions-intensive meat, but also requires the fewest animals for a given amount. The graph shows climate emissions per tonne of meat on the right-hand side, and the number of animals needed to produce a kilogram of meat on the left. The fish “lives lost” number varies significantly by
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
7
EAGxNordics in Norway: apply now
Amalie Farestvedt 🔸
· · 3m read
0
0
32
Introducing Effective Accountability: Project and Job Search Accountability Groups
2 authors
· · 2m read
1
1
15
Applications to EAGxCDMX close in a week!
cescorza
· · 2m read
0
0
View more