I would like to share the policy platform for maximizing total welfare that I've written, applicable to the U.S. government.
This incorporates content from older Candidate Scoring System reports but now has better ideas, sources, and focus, and is now halfway readable and user-friendly.
This is meant to provide academic solutions to debates and to inform EA and EA-adjacent audiences. It's not well optimized for persuasion of general audiences or government officials (although it contains plenty of content that could help you with those things).
As always, challenges are welcome, I actively revise the page with new ideas and sources.
I think there are countervailing reasons in favor of doing so publicly, described here.
Additionally, prominent EA organizations and individuals have already displayed enough politically contentious behavior that a lot of people already perceive EA in certain political ways. Restricting politically contentious public EA behavior to those few orgs and individuals maximizes the problems of 1) and 2) whereas having a wider variety of public EA points of view mitigates them. I'd use a different branding if I were less convinced that politically engaged audiences already perceive EA as having political aspects.