Yes, for the next six months (as an extension of our original three-month test). We don't have any active plans to change the system, but it's possible that we might for some of those six months. Feedback has been highly positive so far, but we'd still like to collect more data on how the prize influences readership and authorship.
(The February prize will be announced around the end of this month; our process was a bit delayed from the usual timeline, since we spent the first two weeks of March collecting feedback and discussing our options.)
Edit: The match seems to now be over - the funds were expended in around 35 minutes. But many of these charities are great and should be supported regardless!
***
On October 22nd starting at 10:00am Pacific Time, Every.org is matching donations to select animal welfare organizations at a 2:1 rate, up to $2,000 per donor per nonprofit (so if you give up to $2,000, they will contribute up to $4,000 and the nonprofit will get up to $6,000). The first donation a donor makes to each el...
Crossposted to Less Wrong
‘Like most of life’s dangers, the dangers of artificial intelligence are not easily identified from the armchair.’
J Dmitri Gallow
Epistemic status
I’m not an expert in this field, and herein I make some sweeping generalisations educated guesses about the overall...
Yes, for the next six months (as an extension of our original three-month test). We don't have any active plans to change the system, but it's possible that we might for some of those six months. Feedback has been highly positive so far, but we'd still like to collect more data on how the prize influences readership and authorship.
(The February prize will be announced around the end of this month; our process was a bit delayed from the usual timeline, since we spent the first two weeks of March collecting feedback and discussing our options.)
Thanks, Aaron.