For those interested in artificial sentience, digital minds, and lives within simulations, I want to highlight my recent peer-reviewed article, which is available as open access in New-Techno Humanities. Below is the abstract.

The emergence of artificially sentient beings raises moral, political, and legal issues that deserve scrutiny. First, it may be difficult to understand the well-being elements of artificially sentient beings and theories of well-being may have to be reconsidered. For instance, as a theory of well-being, hedonism may need to expand the meaning of happiness and suffering or it may run the risk of being irrelevant. Second, we may have to compare the claims of artificially sentient beings with the claims of humans. This calls for interspecies aggregation, which is a neglected form of interpersonal aggregation. Lastly, there are practical problems to address, such as whether to include artificially sentient beings in the political decision-making processes, whether to grant them a right to self-determination in digital worlds, and how to protect them from discrimination. Given these, the emergence of artificially sentient beings compels us to reevaluate the positions we typically hold.

The article is available here.

Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 7:06 PM

Congratulations on getting this published! It seems helpful to have many of these ideas published in an (open-access) peer-reviewed journal.

Many thanks!