What would make a regenerative economic system?

First of all, it means interpreting flows of money as cyclic. What does cyclic mean?

Right now, when you make the decision to pay for something, then this money goes to the shop owner or the provider of the service. And then this individual or group of individuals decides where your money goes next. You don't have any say about where the money goes after you transferred it to the other party.

But it doesn't need to be this way.

Imagine this: A company earns money. Of course a certain chunk is needed to cover its operational expenses. But it has the rest to play with, or, in businessy terms, to "reinvest".

By default, company owners don't give their users any say about where to actually reinvest it. Pretty much all company owners (or the respective investors) believe that they are most knowledgeable about what's the best way to reinvest income.

Unfortunately, mostly they overestimate their own knowledge in this regard. Many companies don't fail because of a lack of income, but because they have reinvest their initial income into the wrong things.

How can we fix this?

It's strikingly, almost shockingly simple. I call it "participative budgeting": All money all users pay for a service goes into a big pot. A certain, rather small share is deducted for operational and other fixed expenses, and the majority can be distributed by the users.

I repeat: The users determine where their money goes and for what the company should spend it. New features, real and virtual events, supporting non-profit projects or anything else.

Financial democracy through fractional voting. Where you don't just vote on whether you want a feature or not, but you can allocate your share of the budget as diversely as you want. Essentially, you don't just have one vote per cycle, but as many votes as you have cents.

Participatory budgeting.

In the beginning, we, as Divizend, will mostly curate the opportunities into which someone can put their funds. Over time, we will make this more and more open. But of course technologically, it'll be open source and GPL-licensed from the start.

See how we implement it in real life in a real startup, as a new business unit of the German FinTech which is already the European market leader in withholding tax reclaims. Taking our incredibly in-depth experience in securities, dividends, capital taxes, financial data, process automation and so much more to reinvent the financial experience for everyone.

See how we make our very first steps in this, how we experiment, how we might fail, how we might succeed. Launch at 1st of April, 7pm CET. RSVP now for our kick-off livestream at live.divizend.com.

PS: Wouldn't this also be great to have for taxes? Where you don't vote for a political party every few years and then just have politicians waste your money, but instead you get the right to distribute the same share of your nation's tax income as everyone else. I don't know, let me know.

-8

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments1
Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

 Pretty much all company owners (or the respective investors) believe that they are most knowledgeable about what's the best way to reinvest income.
Unfortunately, mostly they overestimate their own knowledge in this regard.

The idea that random customers would be better at corporate budgeting than the people who work in those companies and think about corporate strategy every day, is a really strong claim, and you should try to offer evidence for this claim if you want people to take your fintech idea seriously.

Suppose I buy a new car from Toyota, and now I get to decide how Toyota invests the $10K of profit they made by selling me the car.  There are immediately so many problems:

  • How on earth am I supposed to make this decision??  Should they spend the money on ramping up production of this exact car model?  Or should they spend the money on R&D to make better car engines in the future?  Or should they save up money to buy an electric-vehicle battery manufacturing startup?  Maybe they should just spend more on advertising?  I don't know anything about running a car company.  I don't even know what their current budget is -- maybe advertising was the best use of new funds last year, but this year they're already spending a ton on advertising, and it would be better to simply return additional profits to shareholders rather than over-expand?
    • Would it be Toyota's job to give me tons of material that I could read, to become informed and make the decision properly?  But then wouldn't Toyota just end up making all the decisions anyway, in the form of "recommendations", that customers would usually agree with?
      • Wouldn't a lot of this information be secret / internal data, such that giving it away would unduly help rival companies?
    • Maybe an idea is popular and sounds good, but is actually a terrible idea for some subtle reason.  For example, "Toyota should pivot to making self-driving cars powered by AI" sounds like a good idea to me, but I'm guessing that the reason Toyota isn't doing it is that it would be pretty difficult for them to become a leader in self-driving technology.  If ill-informed customers were making decisions, wouldn't we expect follies like this to happen all the time?
  • How is everyone supposed to find the time to be constantly researching different corporations?  Last month I bought a car and had to become a Toyota expert, this month I bought a new TV from Samsung, next month I'll upgrade my Apple iphone, or maybe buy a Nintendo switch.  And let's not forget all the grocery shopping I do, restaurant meals, etc innumerable small purchases.
    • What happens to all the votes of the people who never bother to engage with this system?  What's the incentive for customers to spend time making corporate decisions?
    • It seems like you'd need some kind of liquid-democracy-style delegation system for this to work properly, and not take up everyone's time.  Like, maybe you'd delegate most coporate decision-making power to a single expert who we think knows the most about the company (we could call this person a "CEO"), and then have a wider circle of people that oversee the CEO's behavior and fire them if necessary (this could be a "board of directors"), and then a wider circle of people who are generally interested in that company (these might be called "shareholders") could determine who's on the board of directors...
Curated and popular this week
Relevant opportunities