I've set up a Manifold market for each of the 12 policy ideas discussed in the post, thanks to Michael Chen's idea (Manifold uses collective wisdom to estimate the likelihood of events). You can visit the markets here and bet on whether the US will adopt these ideas by 2028. So go ahead and place your bets, because who said politics can't be a bit of a gamble?
Great job! The design is impressively sleek. I wish I had this dashboard a few months ago when I was coming up with questions for an AI quiz. Congratulations.
Ciao Gio, it's great tthat you're into this topic! Check out the "Suggestions" part of the post for ideas on juggling innovation and safety. Chris has a point about being careful with open-sourcing advanced AI research. Plus, it'd be great if open-source teams created and shared their alignment studies. Who knows, maybe collaborating on alignment research will lead us to the next big breakthrough in AI. ;)
"a white-collar worker alone in an office, 3 monitors full of text, a Great Wave Off Kanagawa crashes against the window, raining inside, extreme detail, bright and vibrant colours --v 4 --ar 3:2"
This was one of my first images on Midjourney, now my prompts are much simpler :)
Great list, thanks for sharing! I'm grateful for the inspiration you've given me — I created Quizmanity.org by working on one of your ideas ;)
By the way, a cousin of the achievements ledger is the AI Safety world map, which shows all the organizations working to reduce existential risk from AI.
'The Humanity Times' is a brilliant name! I've previously designed a front page that reflects a similar concept:
Very useful ! Instead of re-reading the longer explanation of value lock-in from the book, I found this brief explanation here, and it was just what I needed :)
Makes sense, thanks for your comment. You made me think that I should be more careful about the terms I use, and argue more from first principles. I'll try doing this here:
I'm concerned about the growing trend of people and social-media platforms suppressing opposing opinions. I would love a world where people are free to speak their minds without fear of cancellation. If Big Tech and the government dictate what can and cannot be said, then everyone says the same things to avoid the risk of being banned from online platforms. To advance science and maintain freedom, you need to let people express innovative and unconventional ideas, which seem crazy at first and require free speech.
Thank you for your response, Peter. Though I was overly dramatic, the point was that cancel culture harms freedom of speech, without which there is no scientific progress or democracy. Burner accounts may be a symptom of this.
Yes, I think the quality of the prompt is everything when it comes to output quality. You could give it one of your previous scripts and ask it to make a new one on topix X. I also found ChatGPT to be a great brainstormer. For example, you could feed it your existing video titles and ask it to suggest 5 additional topics.
Interesting! One idea they could expand on is that spreading to other stars would mean that the probe we send could later come back to kill us all. Basically, "humans" or probes on other stars would evolve differently from us, and it would take crazy long periods of time to communicate with them. It would be near impossible to coordinate an interstellar civilization, even with light-speed travel.
I recently searched "solar sails" on Youtube and saw no Kurzgesagt-like animation on the topic. It could be an interesting idea!
You’ve probably already seen it but linking it just in case: the Future Perfect 50
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/23399287/future-perfect-50-change-agents#package-toc
Vox released a week ago their Future Perfect 50 with a list of impressive people building a better future:
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/23399287/future-perfect-50-change-agents
Hey, I’m going to Web Summit in Lisbon next week. Not sure if they’re still selling tickets, but it’s a 70,000-people conference and the list of speakers is impressive: https://websummit.com/speakers
Thanks for the links, Rodeo. I appreciate your effort to answer my questions. :)
I can add the number of concerned AI researchers in an answer explanation - thanks for that!
I have a limited amount of questions I can fit into the quiz, so I would have to sacrifice other questions to include the one on HLMI vs. transformative AI. Also, it seems that Holden's transformative AI timeline is the same as the 2022 expert survey on HLMI (2060). So I think one timeline question should do the trick.
I'm considering just writing "Artificial General Intelligence," which is similar to HLMI, because it's the most easily recognizable term for a large audience.
Hey Rodeo, glad you enjoyed the three quizzes!
Thank you for your feedback. I'll pass it to Guided Track, where I host the program. For now, there's a completion bar at the top, but it's a bit thin and doesn't have numbers.
I saw that you work in AI Safety, so maybe you can help me clear two doubts:
Thanks for writing this. I think the communist ideology of "Tax good. Billionaires bad" is ridiculous. I prefer, "Donating good. Founding companies good. Bureaucrats bad."
I don’t think communist ideology is relevant here.
The ideologies at fault are:
nationalist ideology which barely values foreign lives or interests
naive statist ideology which overestimates how effective, democratic and good governments are
In fact, I think communists and European socialists are much less likely to hold these views than the mainstream American left.
Personally, I think “billionaires in general bad” too, but also “governments of rich countries, and in particular government of America, worse”.
This update was very much needed, and congrats on the new introduction—I love it and finally have a page I can share introducing EA!
"It is only when you don’t care about your reputation that you tend to have a good one."
-Nassim Taleb
Hi Bara, thank you very much for your feedback!
Thanks for the catch on the malaria bed net :)
I think cancer deaths have been going up, not down (https://ourworldindata.org/cancer#is-the-world-making-progress-against-cancer), so maybe you meant 4M not 40M in 2015.
I don't fully understand the problem with the 'payload' point, but since I'm in doubt, and I understand that it could be a risk, I will remove it for the moment.
Great catch! I didn't see this deck before, will go through it now. From a first look, it seems like the key numbers deck is general, and these decks are based on the 4 EA cause areas.
I recently published six new wikiHow articles to promote EA principles: How to Make a Difference in Your Career, How to Help Farmed Animals, How to Launch a High Impact Nonprofit, How to Reduce Animal Cruelty in Your Diet, How to Help Save a Child's Life with a Malaria Bed Net Donation, and How to Donate Cryptocurrency to Effective Charities.
Some titles might change soon in case you can't find them anymore (e.g., How to Reduce Animal Cruelty in Your Diet --> How to Have a More Ethical Diet Towards Animals, and How to Help Save a Child's Life...
You mean like Animal Welfare (beginners) and Animal Welfare (advanced)? Thanks for the idea! I never thought about it. Let me know your feedback on the cards once you start revising them :)
What a beautiful project for Open Philanthropy to sponsor! I was so happy to see my favourite YouTube channel publish this video :)
This morning I thought, "EA Forum posts should be shorter and simpler," and now I read your post. Thank you for helping make ideas clear to everyone, not just philosophers ;)
I need to add more examples to my writing. For example, I wrote my list of 90 mental models with no examples, so some mental models are un-understandable.
I recommend to everyone On Writing Well by William Zinsser, which improved my writing by 50%.
I summarised the book in my writing checklist for those short on time. Feedback is welcome :)
Thanks for the insights! While reading your post, I noticed a lack of a summary — so I've distilled your key findings below. Feel free to add it to the original post if useful.
Unofficial Executive Summary
Clearer Thinking ran a study on 500 people exploring the relationship between anxiety and depression, which have a surprisingly high correlation (r=0.82). In short, anxiety reflects worry about potential future adversities, while depression is the feeling of not being able to experience a positive, meaningful life.
Despite these differences, anxiety and dep... (read more)