Just wanted to note that this work was highlighted by ourworldindata.org/do-better-cages-or-cage-free-environments-really-improve-the-lives-of-hens
Can't wait to find time to watch this.
Quick nitpick: there's currently no link at the end of this sentence 'You can see our retrospective on our first two videos here."
I'm convinced tho I must admit I was turned off by this post (and the associated quitgpt.org) opening its case by Brockman's contribution to MAGA. And that's saying something cuz I dislike that movement a lot.Ā
But I really think it's much more partisan and controversial than it should be when the reasons that follow include being unprincipled about enabling authoritarianism.
This is great news and good timing! A few days ago I was wondering what your org was up to.
I'm afraid I'm quite unqualified to do this screw worm research myself but please let me know if there's any other way I can support this effort
This article is really good food for thought but for now I'm more swayed by Marcus's more pessimistic take in the comments. I just wanted to add another correction to this post where it says:Ā
I explored that statement with Gemini 3.5* and it thinks the above is half right .
It said it's correct that early 21st tech boom ended up saving the lives of 5.4 million children each year, cutting global child mortality "by more than half in a single generation".Ā
However it said the roughly 80% reduction in extreme poverty around that time was probably more correlation than causation.
*P.S. Sorry I had to use Gemini cuz I ran out of Claude credits