KV

Kerry_Vaughan

1170 karmaJoined Sep 2014

Participation

    Comments
    206

    It was a short timeline. I don't remember exactly but we told senior leadership and the board quite soon after we decided to start dating.

    No, we didn't do anything wrong. Like I said, we followed the policy.

    People were upset that we were dating but not because there was some coverup or anything. Some folks had strategic disagreements with me and us dating made that a larger problem.

    I think the disagreement here is that we followed the CEA policy and were told explicitly and in writing at the time by the board that our dating had nothing to do with their decision. That doesn't mean staff weren't upset.

    My read is that Bostrom had reason to believe that the email would come out either way, and then he elected to get out in front of the probable blowback.

    As evidence, here is Émile Torres indicating that they were planning to write something about the email.

    That said, it's not entirely clear whether Bostrom knew the email specifically was going to be written about or knew that someone was poking around in the extropian mailing list and then guessed that the email would come out as a result. 

    In any case, I think it's unlikely that he posted his apology for the email unprovoked. 

    There's nothing formally organized that I am aware of.

    I think CEA has been relatively clear over the past few years that it is not the leader of the EA community. My impression is that they see themselves as downstream of the community's intellectual leaders and the will of the community, broadly construed.

    The claim on Twitter is different.

    Can you clarify what you think is unfair? Happy to issue a correction.

    https://twitter.com/KerryLVaughan/status/1591508739236188160?t=qL-dGKXar3b7EQ4EHs597Q&s=19

    Edit: if anyone else wants to take a stab at explaining why the Twitter thread is unfair given this thread feel free. Would want to issue a correction sooner rather than later.

    Will:

    One item that should be a part of your reflections in the days and months to come is whether you are fit to be the public face of the effective altruism movement, given your knowledge of Sam's unethical behavior in the past, ties to him going back to 2013, and your history of vouching for Ben Delo, another disgraced crypto billionaire.

    The EA community has many excellent people - including many highly capable women - who are uninvolved in this scandal and could step up to serve in this capacity.

    Load more