The retaliation against Anthropic by labeling them a supply chain risk is indeed illegal. Congress authorized DoD to label companies as supply chain risks under very specific circumstances - the goal is to prevent foreign adversaries from infiltrating their components into our weapons systems. Hegseth flagrantly abused this power in a contract dispute with an American company. Anthropic has sued, and they will win in court.
In the meantime, the question is whether American companies who do business with both DoD and Anthropic will comply with the illegal decree. Will those companies cut off their business with Anthropic?
Having Congress stand up for the law will strengthen the spines of those companies. That is why I believe contacting your representatives is helpful on the margin.
I appreciate the different perspectives @Aithir , and it takes guts to go against the crowd (I upvoted). What do you think EAs should do differently? Both inside and outside of Anthropic
Welcome to the forum! For videos specifically, John & Hank Green have an enormous number of subscribers, and they're pretty EA as far as I'm concerned. Just last week their vlogbrothers videos discussed treating tuberculosis in the Philippines.
One thing I'd love to have is an EA Workout Playlist on Spotify. Music is cool. Fitness is cool. I'd love to have that in my daily routine.
Iron supplementation is often important for vegans & vegetarians, especially if you also donate blood. Your doctor should measure your blood ferritin, not just hemoglobin. Both are important.
Iron gluconate pills work fine for my wife, but they make me nauseous. Iron glycinate pills work better for me.
Welcome to the forum, @SpeakClearly. You make some good points here, but could you please engage in a friendlier way?
I've heard people say that the idea of an individual's "carbon footprint" has actually harmed the cause of climate activists because it takes the emphasis onto personal behavior and off of policy change. Considering how amazingly successful policy advocacy for animal welfare can be, I worry that "welfare footprint" could be a step in the wrong direction.
Holy smokes this is a good answer! Do you know if anyone is trying to spread thinking about AI x-risk in China, at least among the engineers and intellectuals? I'm unsure about the tractability, but this seems super important & neglected since China still has a decent shot of developing AGI first.
Several of the Statement on AI Risk signatories live in China, including a Dean at Tsinghua University. What can be done to further integrate them into the global AI x-risk community?
Your section "Mythos can hide its thoughts" reminds me a lot of the juncture in AI2027, where the fictional AI company must decide whether to press ahead with a model whose alignment properties were hazy. Something that's unclear from your essay:
Does Anthropic intend to correct the faulty safety training of Mythos (and Claude4.6)?
This seems like a case where disclosure is not enough -- they need to rectify the mistake in order to make these AIs as safe as possible. Especially since Claude4.6/Mythos are likely to be used for the training & alignment of Claude6 and beyond.