All of marswalker's Comments + Replies

TLDR because I got long-winded: If you ever find yourself planning to commit some morally horrible thing in the name of a good outcome, stop. Those kinds of choices aren't made in the real world, they are a thought exercise (normally a really stupid one too.)

Long version: 

Sorry that you got downvoted hard, keep in mind that knee-jerk reactions are probably pretty strong right now. While the disagrees are justified, the downvotes are probably not (I'm assuming this is a legit question.)

I'm constantly looking to learn more about ethics, philosophy, etc ... (read more)

I appreciate the links, these are exactly what I was looking for!  I'll be browsing through them as I get some time! 

It seems like you're on the "expert-master scale" to my "novice - apprentice" level.  Philosophy ultimately won't ever be much more than a fun hobby of mine, but I've always loved diving into some of the deeper stuff. Would you be open to me reaching out and talking with you as I comb through this and come up with questions? 

I understand you're probably busy, so if you have recommendations for some other resources or places to engage people with ideas like this (even if just to read what they write), I would appreciate those too!

8
Richard Y Chappell
2y
For readings on utilitarianism, I'd encourage you to check out the whole website at utilitarianism.net.  If you read our entire online textbook, you'll know more about the topic than basically anyone who doesn't already have a Ph.D. in the area.  For philosophy more broadly, you probably already know about the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy -- it's a fantastic resource, though the entries vary a fair deal in how accessible they are to non-experts. For chatting about the topic, you're welcome to reach out but I can't promise that I'd respond. Your best bet is probably to follow some philosophy blogs (and participate in the comments sections), such as PEA Soup, Fake Nous, Hands and Cities, or my own Good Thoughts. You might also try a smart philosophy student, like Matthew Adelstein of Bentham's Bulldog, who is likely to have more time and so may be more open to discussing topics that you propose, or doing some kind of online reading group together. Good luck!

I'm afraid that despite professing to be a utilitarian, I'm far from an expert. If you've got a moment, could you help me poke a little more into a niche section of this?

Is there some overlap between Hare's two-level utilitarian framework and what is being proposed in this article? It doesn't seem like they're arguing directly for a framework, more explaining why and how they chose their virtues. 

I've always found virtue ethics interesting, my first foray into reading philosophy on my own was focused on it, and I wouldn't have really described myself ... (read more)

Hi!  Sure, their proposed utilitarian virtues could fit neatly into Hare's "intuitive level" of morality, i.e. for guiding everyday behavior.

I don't know of much other work that really develops such concrete proposals for utilitarian virtues, though you may wish to check out the "Further Reading" suggestions at the end of the article.  Most of the related work that I'm familiar with instead addresses the question of how to think about the relationship between utilitarianism and virtue/character in the abstract.  On that topic, see:

... (read more)

Not here to weigh in on the pro/anti nuclear arguments.

I just wanted to thank you for posting and engaging with the forum about your thoughts! I think that this style of post is one of the most useful because it leads to a better understanding for all involved. 

4
rileyharris
2y
Thank you! I really appreciate the encouragement! 

I'm sure you've all seen the EA hub post that was put up about a month ago.  But it's worth re-stating that it's hard to find someone specific in EA sometimes. 

I sometimes use the forum when I'm trying to get in contact with people, primarily by searching their name! 

I also filled out the form, so apologies if this is a double entry! 

Cotton Bot 

Economic growth

Problem: In 2021, a mere 30% of the world’s cotton harvest was gathered by machinery. This means
that over 60% of the 2021 worldwide supply of cotton was harvested using the same methods as
American slaves in the 1850’s. A significant amount of the hand harvesting includes forced labor.

Solution: The integration of existing technologies can provide a modular, robust, swarming team of
small-scale, low-cost harvesters. Thoughtful system design will ensure the harvesters are simple to
operate and maintain while still containing leadi... (read more)

7
Dawn Drescher
2y
I think this is key. If most of the harvest is not forced labor, then the cotton bot may just steal the least terrible employment opportunity from these people and they have to fall back on something more terrible. Then again it can maybe be marketed specifically to the places that use forced labor.
1
marswalker
2y
I also filled out the form, so apologies if this is a double entry! 

I had a similar idea, and I think that a few more things need to be included in the discussion of this. 

There are multiple levels of ideas in EA, and I think that a red team becomes much more valuable when they are engaging with issues that are applicable to the whole of EA. 

I think ideas like the institutional critique of EA, the other heavy tail, and others are often not read and internalized by EAs. I think it is worth having a team that makes arguments like this, then breaks them down and provides methods for avoiding the pitfalls pointed out... (read more)

2
Dawn Drescher
2y
I basically agree but in this proposal I was really referring to such things as “Professor X is using probabilistic programming to model regularities in human moral preferences. How can that backfire and result in the destruction of our world? What other risks can we find? Can X mitigate them?” I also think that the category that you’re referring to is very valuable but I think those are “simply” contributions to priorities research as they are published by the Global Priorities Institute (e.g., working papers by Greaves and Tarsney come to mind). Rethink Priorities, Open Phil, FHI, and various individuals also occasionally publish articles that I would class that way. I think priorities research is one of the most important fields of EA and much broader than my proposal, but it is also well-known. Hence why my proposal is not meant to be about that.

Led to personal lifestyle changes, bought an air purifier and gave them as gifts to friends and family. 

Glad I'm not the only one who sees it! I'm a low risk style investor, but I've sold everything I have and I'm doing cash covered put spreads, We'll see how it all turns out. 

Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

I don't know if altruistic, truth seeking, and self aware are all necessary requirements though.   It seems very much so to me that we're never going to be able to convince the vast majority of people to have the excited attitude about EA that most of us do now. Maybe the right focus of the "altruism" meme like this should be on spreading the first two, altruistic and truth seeking. 

Self awareness seems almost contrary to the idea of a meme like this, given that it relies on the spreading without too much question... (read more)

4
Owen Cotton-Barratt
3y
Why does it need to rely on spreading without too much questioning? (BTW I'm using "meme" in the original general sense not the more specific "internet meme" usage; was that obvious enough?)

I've actually had some experiences with things like this as well. I first got into meditation by having someone hypnotize me, as an example. 

I think that most things like this have a little bit of truth to them, but that because there's so much extra attached to the concepts that it's hard to separate them out. 

To use a personal example, the other day I was wiki diving and I discovered chaos magic (link below.) I proceeded to pretty much immediately make a sigil. I don't believe in chaos magic by any means, I really think this is  just an ap... (read more)

1
Jung Enthusiast
3y
Thanks! To clarify, I posted it in the EA forum due to EA's interest in science policy and infrastructure. I felt it might serve to suggest it might be worth prioritizing higher or looking into further. I don't believe ancient spirituality (depending on how it's defined) is scientific due to wording in the area, but I do believe most concepts in the area seem to be true or have truth to them. There seems to be misinterpretation of what various terms and motifs reference, though. A good example is a Reddit post titled: TIL Not long after Julius Caesar was assassinated, a comet shone for seven successive days. This signified Julius Caesar's ascension to Godhood, and propaganda for Caesar's nephew. The comet was described as: "To make that soul a star that burns forever, Above the Forum and the gates of Rome." It seems an awful lot like images that appear when "Ida, Pingala, Sushumna" is image searched with seven referencing something with chakras, the comet referencing spirit, the soul referencing the psyche, gates referencing nadis, Godhood referencing Buddhahood or something with enlightenment, and death referencing ego death. As for alternative medicine, to my surprise, when I looked into it, much or most of it is scientific. It's just poorly branded, and there appears to be conflict of interest. Some good examples are functional medicine, holistic medicine, and naturopathic medicine. The fields use engineering principles such as whole systems thinking and root cause analysis and tend to use natural products more but are not opposed to using synthetic products if they work best.  Dr. Jeffrey Bland, Dr. Frank Lipman, the Institute for Functional Medicine, and Dr. Will Cole seem like good sources on the subject. It's worth noting Wikipedia's medical pages seem to have strong bias.

I agree with you whole heartedly! I definitely feel the pressure to narrow down and it's hard to keep my "eye on the prize" so to speak. 

I try to remind myself that I'm here to make "this" better, and it doesn't matter how I do it. So I've been trying to diversify my overall look at the world. 

I like the list of ideas, I hadn't considered doing an internship or research project, it's not something I'm very familiar with, so I'll have to put a little more thought into it! 

I definitely need to sit down and read everything 80K hours has put out... (read more)

 I was one of those kids who was told they were smart and didn't have to do much in high-school. As a result I got hit pretty hard in the face by the requirement of actually trying in college.  Combine this with the fact that I didn't do well away from a support network and you have a pretty bad downward spiral. I eventually recovered, but boy was it a rough couple of years!

Right now I'm looking at either technical work or more general purpose studying: 

The difference between those is a kind of along the Engineering/computer science or Econo... (read more)

I'll throw myself out there!

I've always thought of myself as most likely a Earn to give type person, but I'm looking at starting college in the next year or so and I realized that I'm not a bad  candidate for some really important sounding colleges. (I.E. I imagine Oxford is a long shot, but it's not unimaginable.)

EA seems to be talent constrained in a lot of ways, so if I get into a good college. Should I go direct work? And if so, what degree is most applicable? 

Of note: I'm not turned off by the relative hardness of the degree to earn. So stic... (read more)

6
saulius
3y
You seem to assume that if (and only if) you do well in a good college, then you will almost certainly be good at direct work. I'm not convinced that there necessarily is that much of a correlation because these things are so very different. I myself did quite badly in a mediocre university but people seem to think that I have been doing well working as a researcher at an EA organization.
9
Benjamin_Todd
3y
Hi Will, James is asking a good question below, but I'm going to dive into a hot take :) If you're about to start university, I'm wondering if you might be narrowing down too early. My normal advice for someone entering college for figuring out their career would be something like: 1. Draw up a long list of potential longer-term options. 2. See if you can 'try out' all of these paths while there, and right after. You can consider all the following ways to try out potential paths, which also give you useful career capital: 1. Doing 1-2 internships. 2. Doing a research project as part of your studies or during the summer. 3. Going to lots of talks from people in different areas. 4. Getting involved in relevant student societies (e.g. student newspaper for the media) 5. Doing side projects & self-study in free time (e.g. building a website, learning to program) 6. Near the end, you can apply to jobs in several categories as well as graduate school, and see where you get the best offers. 7. And even after college, you can probably then try something and switch again if it's not working. So, going in, you don't need to have very definite plans. Besides being able to explore several paths within earning to give, I'd also encourage you to consider exploring some outside. As a starting point, some broad categories we often cover are: government and policy options, working at social impact organisations in your top cause areas (not just EA orgs), and graduate study (potentially leading into working at research organisations or as a researcher). Try to generate at least a couple of ideas within each of these. Which subject should you study? A big factor should be personal fit – one factor there would be whether you'll be able to get good grades in moderate time (since you can use that time to do the steps above and also to socialise - and many meet their lifetime friends and partner at university). Besides that, you could consider which subject will (i) be mos
5
james
3y
Hey Will! Would you be able to say anything more about why you didn't like the 2 years of college that you did? What sort of college degrees are you looking into right now? :)

Anyone financially strapped? PM me and I'll venmo you cash to cover it! 

Does anyone know how the 25$ credit is rewarded? I.E. is it directly applied to the donation you made or is it credited to the account that makes the donation? 

5
WilliamKiely
3y
Tina (co-founder of Every.org) just replied to your comment with: Unfortunately since she is a new user I think her comment is being hidden until she gets above the 10-karma threshold (if I'm not mistaken... I have a vague recollection of there being a 10-karma threshold that caused me trouble once). Upvote her comment here so it's visible. EDIT: Okay, it's now over 10-karma and still hidden; I don't know what the issue is.

It's credited to the account that makes the donation, so that you can direct it elsewhere if you want. You can see it in your Payments tab: https://www.every.org/my-giving/payment

This does sound like one of those rare cases where a little effort can mean a lot of impact, where would you recommend we focus our time and funds? 

What's limiting you and how can I help? 

3
Sanjay
3y
Thank you very much Will K and Id25 for asking how you can help. Based on the conversations I've had with people thus far, I think the gap is for organisers/liaisers. I.e. * we will run some social media ads * most ads viewers will do nothing, some of the ad viewers will send an email to their MP (as requested), some will want to engage more * For those who want to engage more, we'll need people to talk with them -- these are the organisers/liaisers. We don't know yet how many of these people will be needed. At the time I wrote this post, I thought there might be a gap for analysis, but I suspect that gap might not exist after all. If you are interested in helping out, please send me a message via the EA Forum or directly to sanjay_joshi { a t } hotmail.co.uk
2
ld25
3y
Same here, how exactly can we help?

Become a crisis counselor. 

Crisis text line is a non-profit organization devoted to the idea of providing someone to talk to when you really need one. Typically as a crisis counselor you will log on and join the "queue" of people waiting to talk to someone who needs it. When people feel overwhelmed (In crisis) they'll text in, those texts are sent directly to the web browser of the person next in line, and pop up as a chat box. 

Pros: 

  • Immediate ability to help someone in need: delay times of as little as 10 minutes, including the time it take
... (read more)

I'm a big fan of Crisis text line, though I'm certainly biased because I volunteer there. If you're looking for a list of mental health resources to peruse. Their list of referrals is pretty good.

https://www.crisistextline.org/referrals

You can also text them at 741741 and be connected with someone to text real time, their goal is to get you to someone in under 5 minutes, though they struggle during high traffic hours due to volume.

I'm going to be making a post about them (as a volunteer opportunity) at some point in the future, though work is incredibly demanding right now, so it might be a little while.

Perhaps incentive drift is more accurate, but it certainly seems to rob the individual of their agency. I know I am a collection of the circumstances I was raised in, however, that does not mean that I can pass blame onto those around me when I choose something wrong.

Perhaps the choice between the two words is a difference between Instrumental and Value rationalistic choices. Where a Value rationalist would prefer to use the term Incentive drift because it more accurately describes the reality of this "drift." An Instrumental rationalist would p... (read more)

Thank you both for donating. And I'll add another +1 to the number of people who have donated 1,000. I'm hoping that an update on the status of the hotel comes soon.

3
CEEALAR
4y
OP and fundraiser page now updated. tldr: runway now ~3 months :)

It's looking like we now have runway until the end of the year, thanks to you three and others who have donated in the last few days :) Will post a more detailed update (and update the fundraiser page) in the coming days.