Moderator Comments
Will Aldred
Moderator Comment6
1
0

Mod here. It looks like this thread has devolved into a personal dispute with only tangential relevance to EA. I’m therefore locking the thread.

Those involved, please don’t try to resurrect the dispute elsewhere on this forum; we may issue bans if we see that happening.

A moderator has deactivated replies on this comment
Toby Tremlett🔹
Moderator Comment2
0
0

Mod comment: We verified that SIRgiving uses the every.org API. We haven’t checked anything further and can’t vouch for the matching offer or other claims.

Toby Tremlett🔹
*Moderator Comment6
3
1
Pinned by Sarah Cheng 🔸

Discussion of this topic can be heated or emotionally difficult for some. We would like to remind everyone to adhere to forum norms: be respectful, interpret others' comments charitably, and avoid personal attacks. Please don’t assume other people’s values or backgrounds.

As Richard notes at the end of the post, reproductive rights are an orthogonal conversation — you can be worried about low fertility rates and population decline without it affecting your view on abortion, contraception, or social conservatism. 

However, some readers may come from cont... (read more)

Francis
Moderator Comment3
0
0

Update: this user returned to the Forum again under a new account, which we have banned. Bans affect the user, not the account.

JP Addison🔸
Moderator Comment2
2
4
1

We're issuing @NobodyInteresting a warning for the above comment. The comment does not meet the expectations for civility and engaging in good faith. I would not recommend a public warning for this comment on it's own (though I would downvote it for the above reasons, and recommend a discrete DM), but we have less tolerance for users who have not yet shown that they can engage productively.

Will Aldred
*Moderator Comment20
5
2

The moderation team is issuing @Eugenics-Adjacent a 6-month ban for flamebait and trolling.

I’ll note that Eugenics-Adjacent’s posts and comments have been mostly about pushing against what they see as EA groupthink. In banning them, I do feel a twinge of “huh, I hope I’m not making the Forum more like an echo chamber.” However, there are tradeoffs at play. “Overrun by flamebait and trolling” seems to be the default end state for most internet spaces: the Forum moderation team is committed to fighting against this default.

All in all, we think the ... (read more)

Toby Tremlett🔹
Moderator Comment4
1
0

Update: this user returned to the Forum yesterday to re-post the same piece. I've banned that account as well. Bans affect the user, not the account. 

Will Aldred
Moderator Comment12
1
0
2

The moderators have reviewed the decision to ban @dstudioscode after users appealed the decision. Tl;dr: We are revoking the ban, and are instead rate-limiting dstudioscode and warning them to avoid posting content that could be perceived as advocating for major harm or illegal activities. The rate limit is due to dstudiocode’s pattern of engagement on the Forum, not simply because of their most recent post—for more on this, see the “third consideration” listed below.

More details:

Three moderators,[1] none of whom was involved in the original... (read more)

JP Addison🔸
Moderator Comment-1
0
9

Moderation update: We're issuing dstudiocode a one-month ban for breaking Forum norms in their recent post and subsequent behavior. Specifically:

  • Posting content that could be interpreted as promoting violence or illegal activities.

The post in question, which asked whether murdering meat-eaters could be considered "ethical," crosses a line in terms of promoting potential violence.

As a reminder, the ban affects the user, not just the account. During their ban period, the user will not be permitted to rejoin the Forum under another account name. If they ... (read more)

[This comment is no longer endorsed by its author]Reply
EdoArad
Moderator Comment5
0
0

I'm not sure either - there's some bug and I didn't manage to delete them. I've moved them to personal blog post and I'm alerting the technical team 

Load more