Hide table of contents

Summary:

I am thinking of information on other preventive healthcare measures, demonstrating the importance of using a net at disbursal, and extrapolating the care of sharing a net to consideration of others in general also by officers who distribute nets. For alternatives maybe vaccine development, existing prophylaxis drugs procurement cost reduction agreements or investments, and profit-motivated and extraeconomic self-development opportunities. Can any of this be competitive in cost-effectiveness with the current AMF programming? What else can be cost-effective?

 

In regards to co-interventions, I am thinking:

Beneficiary health and wellbeing improvement

  • A cool poster/sheet under the net packaging inspiring people to take other preventive healthcare measures, such as teach children to wash hands, take children to the clinic when they experience difficulty breathing (not COVID but Lower respiratory infections treatment (filtering for Low SDI)), having a childbirth at the clinic (neonatal also the linked GBD compare resource), giving water with sugar and salt when children experience diarrhea, info on HIV/AIDS prevention, iron supplementation (or reminding millers to fortify their flour or buying just fortified), vitamin A supplementation, vaccination, good locally available and affordable protein sources and their importance, plus maybe something on road safety (such as reminding drivers to not speed and chat with the local authorities if drivers are unsafe) - with information on locally available free of charge services and possibly a small tokens of appreciation (e. g. if available for vaccination/supplementation)
    • Beneficiaries can enjoy posters as anecdotally a poor or extremely poor farmer in Kenya was decorating their house with random newspapers (described by a former Wall Street Journal correspondent)
  • Also something that would motivate people to really use the nets - the current use rate (based on the limited data available on GW’s page) should be about 75%
    • Maybe coaching the officers who disburse the nets to tell people/demonstrate (also from the WSJ journalist book) - demonstrating maybe be more effective than just telling because perhaps people learn better from experience - why it is important to use the net (prevention of stress when a child gets malaria and medicine is needed very fast when funding to travel for and purchase medicine may not be available)
  • Something that would motivate people to take care of others
    • Just like giving a net to one’s family, it is important to motivate children to study, not be abusive, and report bullies to local (informal) authorities - ideally by personal example of continued self-development and righteous action - maybe also specified by the officers during disbursal - this should address wellbeing issues related to limited agency and perception of growth prospects

I think that if there is someone who develops shareable training material for the disbursal officers then it should be ok with AMF to allow such training and maybe measure effects by an RCT since they already collect data from all households individually. Similarly with any info sheets but these need to be printed and placed which is a task that requires more coordination effort. It is a potentially high impact opportunity especially for community members in emerging economies.

I think that even funders can enjoy this as always the most cost-effective intervention is sought, ideally one which supports institutional change. Which can inspire funding leverage at funder’s partners and competitors that are also selecting from competing impact opportunities.

 

Alternatives:

Also, what are the alternatives and should they be prioritized at the cost of not disbursing bednets (maybe funding vaccine R&D, negotiating bulk purchase (or free of charge, just like for deworming drugs) agreements with suppliers of malarone and other chemoprophylaxis drugs, stepping back and seeing if people should be rather given actual prospects in terms of employment opportunities and extraeconomic self-development)?

New Answer
New Comment


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 11m read
 · 
Does a food carbon tax increase animal deaths and/or the total time of suffering of cows, pigs, chickens, and fish? Theoretically, this is possible, as a carbon tax could lead consumers to substitute, for example, beef with chicken. However, this is not per se the case, as animal products are not perfect substitutes.  I'm presenting the results of my master's thesis in Environmental Economics, which I re-worked and published on SSRN as a pre-print. My thesis develops a model of animal product substitution after a carbon tax, slaughter tax, and a meat tax. When I calibrate[1] this model for the U.S., there is a decrease in animal deaths and duration of suffering following a carbon tax. This suggests that a carbon tax can reduce animal suffering. Key points * Some animal products are carbon-intensive, like beef, but causes relatively few animal deaths or total time of suffering because the animals are large. Other animal products, like chicken, causes relatively many animal deaths or total time of suffering because the animals are small, but cause relatively low greenhouse gas emissions. * A carbon tax will make some animal products, like beef, much more expensive. As a result, people may buy more chicken. This would increase animal suffering, assuming that farm animals suffer. However, this is not per se the case. It is also possible that the direct negative effect of a carbon tax on chicken consumption is stronger than the indirect (positive) substitution effect from carbon-intensive products to chicken. * I developed a non-linear market model to predict the consumption of different animal products after a tax, based on own-price and cross-price elasticities. * When calibrated for the United States, this model predicts a decrease in the consumption of all animal products considered (beef, chicken, pork, and farmed fish). Therefore, the modelled carbon tax is actually good for animal welfare, assuming that animals live net-negative lives. * A slaughter tax (a
Ozzie Gooen
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
We’re releasing Squiggle AI, a tool that generates probabilistic models using the Squiggle language. This can provide early cost-effectiveness models and other kinds of probabilistic programs. No prior Squiggle knowledge is required to use Squiggle AI. Simply ask for whatever you want to estimate, and the results should be fairly understandable. The Squiggle programming language acts as an adjustable backend, but isn’t mandatory to learn. Beyond being directly useful, we’re interested in Squiggle AI as an experiment in epistemic reasoning with LLMs. We hope it will help highlight potential strengths, weaknesses, and directions for the field. Screenshots The “Playground” view after it finishes a successful workflow. Form on the left, code in the middle, code output on the right.The “Steps” page. Shows all of the steps that the workflow went through, next to the form on the left. For each, shows a simplified view of recent messages to and from the LLM. Motivation Organizations in the effective altruism and rationalist communities regularly rely on cost-effectiveness analyses and fermi estimates to guide their decisions. QURI's mission is to make these probabilistic tools more accessible and reliable for altruistic causes. However, our experience with tools like Squiggle and Guesstimate has revealed a significant challenge: even highly skilled domain experts frequently struggle with the basic programming requirements and often make errors in their models. This suggests a need for alternative approaches. Language models seem particularly well-suited to address these difficulties. Fermi estimates typically follow straightforward patterns and rely on common assumptions, making them potentially ideal candidates for LLM assistance. Previous direct experiments with Claude and ChatGPT alone proved insufficient, but with substantial iteration, we've developed a framework that significantly improves the output quality and user experience. We're focusing specifically on
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
Tl;DR: Fill out the one-question-form below to let us know if you’d be willing to try out a free Growth & Wellbeing platform for EAs. Share Your Interest in RISE The Gist Over the past few months, we’ve been exploring an idea that’s received a lot of enthusiasm from EA community members, psychologists, coaches, and the community health team: creating a platform tailored to the unique mental health and personal growth challenges faced by EA-affiliated and similar individuals. This project would provide interventions designed by EA-familiar psychologists and coaches, addressing challenges common to EAs, such as impostor syndrome, burnout, perfectionism, anxiety, and more. For example, many EAs have reported feelings of self-doubt or decision paralysis when navigating the complexity of global cause areas or the emotional toll of working on catastrophic risks. These plans can be further customized by users to fit their specific needs and circumstances. Before fully committing, we’d love your input: Would you use a platform like this? Do you see value in having a dedicated tool to support psychological well-being and personal growth in the EA community? Why This Matters * Community Need: Internal surveys and community discussions (for instance: self-care, burnout) have surfaced common well-being challenges within the movement. Many community members report stress, self-doubt, and burnout difficulties. While these are common human struggles, the high-stakes nature of EA work and its unique contexts—like longtermism, existential-risk projects, or navigating uncertainty about career paths—can make them even more pronounced. Improving well-being and personal growth not only enhances individual quality of life but also strengthens the community’s overall effectiveness. * Personalization Gap: Mainstream self-help many times fails because it doesn’t adapt well to the individual’s unique situation. This Project aims to bridge this gap by offering community-tailored prac