Reflecting on 2021, I’ve identified a few broad strategies that have helped me be much more productive, both professionally (including on some EA projects) and personally. I’ve summarized these thoughts below; please feel free to share additional ideas or respond to these in the comments!

Spend time training on the programs you use most frequently—even the basic ones

A conservative estimate suggests I’ve spent more than 10,000 hours working in Microsoft Word over my time as a student and employee. I kinda assumed that I knew everything I needed to know about working in Word. But I watched a few tutorials on YouTube, and the ~45 minutes I spent watching those, along with the hour I spent messing around in Word afterward, are probably the highest ROI of any work I’ve done in the past year. I learned tips and tricks that have made me work faster and more efficiently in Word, especially when completing certain formatting-sensitive tasks. I can’t recommend this enough. Here are a few videos I’d recommend on Word. Word tools that I found super helpful but had previously not known about include: setting default font and paragraph settings, changing the paste options, and using find and replace more effectively (i.e., to remove formatting). Depending on the work you do, macros can take Word to a whole new level. And Word is just the beginning

Many of us spend up to several hours a day on email. Improving your email efficiency is thus potentially high-leverage. Learning about folders, tags, shortcuts, rules/filters, and other tools can be super helpful. There are trainings for whatever client you have—Gmail, Outlook, etc; I’d highly recommend checking some of them out.

This same advice applies to any program that you extensively use, whether professionally or personally, such as Excel. I’ve found this Excel playlist helpful.

You can also go a step further and do some training on using your computer and/or phone most efficiently. Simple shortcuts can make a big difference! For example, I’ve found learning how to quickly create a split-screen has been super helpful (on Windows, drag any window all the way to the right and it’ll automatically bifurcate your screen). Avenues for learning more about this include books, articles, and YouTube tutorials. Here’s a few I’ve found helpful: Windows keyboard shortcuts, Mac keyboard shortcuts, Windows 10 tips

Maintain a list of ongoing projects with latest progress logged and decision points identified 

My job involves managing a ton of smaller projects and coordinating their review by a bunch of different people. It’s easy for things to get lost in the shuffle. By keeping a list of current projects, I ensure that nothing gets forgotten, keep projects moving through the process, and have a sense of where my time and energy are actually going. I can’t share my actual work log, but here’s a generic version

There are a lot of advantages to this approach. I’ve found that it both greatly reduces the likelihood of catastrophic failure (i.e., forgetting about an important project or time-sensitive action item) while also reducing the amount of wasted mental energy spent on making sure I’m not forgetting day-to-day items. It makes it much easier to reflect on whether you’re allocating your time and attention on your biggest priorities. You may find that you’re working on a bunch of projects related to an issue you’re less interested in, while one of your key priorities is falling to the wayside. It’s much easier to see that if you’re writing things down! As a bonus, whenever anyone mentions in passing “hey, maybe we should try X!” or you wake up with a sudden idea for a personal project, you can add it to the list. This way, you’ll have a clear record of ideas when you’re next trawling for project ideas, rather than something being written down on a post-it, never to be seen again. 

Establish regular check-ins with set discussion topics to ensure that projects are progressing

As previously discussed, it can be too easy for projects or priorities to get lost in the shuffle. Establishing regular check-ins is a good way to establish a minimum threshold for what’s getting done as well as a minimum threshold for communication. 

I’ve found this invaluable both personally and professionally. I talk to my boss several times a day, but having formal check-ins every other week where we go through my task list ensures that we touch base on everything I’m working on (whereas certain projects might otherwise fall by the wayside) and creates a ready-made opportunity for either of us to raise ongoing concerns. I’ve found that regular check-ins facilitate a higher quality, more reflective kind of communication that might not otherwise occur. In preparing for the check-ins, I have a chance to reflect on the work I’ve been doing, which often allows me to identify recurring issues or potential sites of improvement. And in the check-ins themselves, both my boss and I have the opportunity to raise concerns or ideas that might not come up when we’re caught in the flow of day-to-day work. And indeed, I’ve found that during times where these check-ins don’t occur, problems tend to linger longer without receiving the proper attention

Regular check-ins with key colleagues/research partners/etc. are also invaluable when you don’t otherwise communicate particularly frequently. This is particularly useful when dealing with folks who are busier or less proactive; some folks may otherwise not realize that you can be a resource for them or offer solutions. Regular check-ins thus create a minimum level of communication that can help facilitate collaboration.

I also use this approach in my personal life: I have a weekly check-in with my romantic partner. That might sound artificial or strange—we live together, we communicate plenty!—but as I mentioned above, communication, full stop, is not the same as effective or goals-oriented communication. Creating a formal check-in has been surprisingly helpful.

 

I hope this is helpful to someone–at the very least, I found it helpful to write all of this down–and happy new year to all!

Comments2


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Hey Sarah,

I really love the advice you've given here.

I frequently find myself getting enticed by the latest productivity tool or project management app and your simple  but effective method of managing projects in a Google Doc outline is a nice reminder that the best tool is often the simplest one that works.

Clement Kao, an EA-aligned product manager, has some additional thoughts on effective 1-on-1s here

Also, big fan of deliberate check-ins with romantic partners and have found framework outlined here to be especially useful.
 

Thanks for sharing these resources, Quinn! I like the discussion of the importance of agendas in the first link and the emphasis on taking notes in the second one; documentation can be so helpful both in the moment and looking back! Glad my writeup was helpful.

Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
LintzA
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
Cross-posted to Lesswrong Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achi
Rory Fenton
 ·  · 6m read
 · 
Cross-posted from my blog. Contrary to my carefully crafted brand as a weak nerd, I go to a local CrossFit gym a few times a week. Every year, the gym raises funds for a scholarship for teens from lower-income families to attend their summer camp program. I don’t know how many Crossfit-interested low-income teens there are in my small town, but I’ll guess there are perhaps 2 of them who would benefit from the scholarship. After all, CrossFit is pretty niche, and the town is small. Helping youngsters get swole in the Pacific Northwest is not exactly as cost-effective as preventing malaria in Malawi. But I notice I feel drawn to supporting the scholarship anyway. Every time it pops in my head I think, “My money could fully solve this problem”. The camp only costs a few hundred dollars per kid and if there are just 2 kids who need support, I could give $500 and there would no longer be teenagers in my town who want to go to a CrossFit summer camp but can’t. Thanks to me, the hero, this problem would be entirely solved. 100%. That is not how most nonprofit work feels to me. You are only ever making small dents in important problems I want to work on big problems. Global poverty. Malaria. Everyone not suddenly dying. But if I’m honest, what I really want is to solve those problems. Me, personally, solve them. This is a continued source of frustration and sadness because I absolutely cannot solve those problems. Consider what else my $500 CrossFit scholarship might do: * I want to save lives, and USAID suddenly stops giving $7 billion a year to PEPFAR. So I give $500 to the Rapid Response Fund. My donation solves 0.000001% of the problem and I feel like I have failed. * I want to solve climate change, and getting to net zero will require stopping or removing emissions of 1,500 billion tons of carbon dioxide. I give $500 to a policy nonprofit that reduces emissions, in expectation, by 50 tons. My donation solves 0.000000003% of the problem and I feel like I have f