Reflecting on 2021, I’ve identified a few broad strategies that have helped me be much more productive, both professionally (including on some EA projects) and personally. I’ve summarized these thoughts below; please feel free to share additional ideas or respond to these in the comments!

Spend time training on the programs you use most frequently—even the basic ones

A conservative estimate suggests I’ve spent more than 10,000 hours working in Microsoft Word over my time as a student and employee. I kinda assumed that I knew everything I needed to know about working in Word. But I watched a few tutorials on YouTube, and the ~45 minutes I spent watching those, along with the hour I spent messing around in Word afterward, are probably the highest ROI of any work I’ve done in the past year. I learned tips and tricks that have made me work faster and more efficiently in Word, especially when completing certain formatting-sensitive tasks. I can’t recommend this enough. Here are a few videos I’d recommend on Word. Word tools that I found super helpful but had previously not known about include: setting default font and paragraph settings, changing the paste options, and using find and replace more effectively (i.e., to remove formatting). Depending on the work you do, macros can take Word to a whole new level. And Word is just the beginning

Many of us spend up to several hours a day on email. Improving your email efficiency is thus potentially high-leverage. Learning about folders, tags, shortcuts, rules/filters, and other tools can be super helpful. There are trainings for whatever client you have—Gmail, Outlook, etc; I’d highly recommend checking some of them out.

This same advice applies to any program that you extensively use, whether professionally or personally, such as Excel. I’ve found this Excel playlist helpful.

You can also go a step further and do some training on using your computer and/or phone most efficiently. Simple shortcuts can make a big difference! For example, I’ve found learning how to quickly create a split-screen has been super helpful (on Windows, drag any window all the way to the right and it’ll automatically bifurcate your screen). Avenues for learning more about this include books, articles, and YouTube tutorials. Here’s a few I’ve found helpful: Windows keyboard shortcuts, Mac keyboard shortcuts, Windows 10 tips

Maintain a list of ongoing projects with latest progress logged and decision points identified 

My job involves managing a ton of smaller projects and coordinating their review by a bunch of different people. It’s easy for things to get lost in the shuffle. By keeping a list of current projects, I ensure that nothing gets forgotten, keep projects moving through the process, and have a sense of where my time and energy are actually going. I can’t share my actual work log, but here’s a generic version

There are a lot of advantages to this approach. I’ve found that it both greatly reduces the likelihood of catastrophic failure (i.e., forgetting about an important project or time-sensitive action item) while also reducing the amount of wasted mental energy spent on making sure I’m not forgetting day-to-day items. It makes it much easier to reflect on whether you’re allocating your time and attention on your biggest priorities. You may find that you’re working on a bunch of projects related to an issue you’re less interested in, while one of your key priorities is falling to the wayside. It’s much easier to see that if you’re writing things down! As a bonus, whenever anyone mentions in passing “hey, maybe we should try X!” or you wake up with a sudden idea for a personal project, you can add it to the list. This way, you’ll have a clear record of ideas when you’re next trawling for project ideas, rather than something being written down on a post-it, never to be seen again. 

Establish regular check-ins with set discussion topics to ensure that projects are progressing

As previously discussed, it can be too easy for projects or priorities to get lost in the shuffle. Establishing regular check-ins is a good way to establish a minimum threshold for what’s getting done as well as a minimum threshold for communication. 

I’ve found this invaluable both personally and professionally. I talk to my boss several times a day, but having formal check-ins every other week where we go through my task list ensures that we touch base on everything I’m working on (whereas certain projects might otherwise fall by the wayside) and creates a ready-made opportunity for either of us to raise ongoing concerns. I’ve found that regular check-ins facilitate a higher quality, more reflective kind of communication that might not otherwise occur. In preparing for the check-ins, I have a chance to reflect on the work I’ve been doing, which often allows me to identify recurring issues or potential sites of improvement. And in the check-ins themselves, both my boss and I have the opportunity to raise concerns or ideas that might not come up when we’re caught in the flow of day-to-day work. And indeed, I’ve found that during times where these check-ins don’t occur, problems tend to linger longer without receiving the proper attention

Regular check-ins with key colleagues/research partners/etc. are also invaluable when you don’t otherwise communicate particularly frequently. This is particularly useful when dealing with folks who are busier or less proactive; some folks may otherwise not realize that you can be a resource for them or offer solutions. Regular check-ins thus create a minimum level of communication that can help facilitate collaboration.

I also use this approach in my personal life: I have a weekly check-in with my romantic partner. That might sound artificial or strange—we live together, we communicate plenty!—but as I mentioned above, communication, full stop, is not the same as effective or goals-oriented communication. Creating a formal check-in has been surprisingly helpful.

 

I hope this is helpful to someone–at the very least, I found it helpful to write all of this down–and happy new year to all!

38

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments2


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Hey Sarah,

I really love the advice you've given here.

I frequently find myself getting enticed by the latest productivity tool or project management app and your simple  but effective method of managing projects in a Google Doc outline is a nice reminder that the best tool is often the simplest one that works.

Clement Kao, an EA-aligned product manager, has some additional thoughts on effective 1-on-1s here

Also, big fan of deliberate check-ins with romantic partners and have found framework outlined here to be especially useful.
 

Thanks for sharing these resources, Quinn! I like the discussion of the importance of agendas in the first link and the emphasis on taking notes in the second one; documentation can be so helpful both in the moment and looking back! Glad my writeup was helpful.

Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Neel Nanda
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
TL;DR Having a good research track record is some evidence of good big-picture takes, but it's weak evidence. Strategic thinking is hard, and requires different skills. But people often conflate these skills, leading to excessive deference to researchers in the field, without evidence that that person is good at strategic thinking specifically. I certainly try to have good strategic takes, but it's hard, and you shouldn't assume I succeed! Introduction I often find myself giving talks or Q&As about mechanistic interpretability research. But inevitably, I'll get questions about the big picture: "What's the theory of change for interpretability?", "Is this really going to help with alignment?", "Does any of this matter if we can’t ensure all labs take alignment seriously?". And I think people take my answers to these way too seriously. These are great questions, and I'm happy to try answering them. But I've noticed a bit of a pathology: people seem to assume that because I'm (hopefully!) good at the research, I'm automatically well-qualified to answer these broader strategic questions. I think this is a mistake, a form of undue deference that is both incorrect and unhelpful. I certainly try to have good strategic takes, and I think this makes me better at my job, but this is far from sufficient. Being good at research and being good at high level strategic thinking are just fairly different skillsets! But isn’t someone being good at research strong evidence they’re also good at strategic thinking? I personally think it’s moderate evidence, but far from sufficient. One key factor is that a very hard part of strategic thinking is the lack of feedback. Your reasoning about confusing long-term factors need to extrapolate from past trends and make analogies from things you do understand better, and it can be quite hard to tell if what you're saying is complete bullshit or not. In an empirical science like mechanistic interpretability, however, you can get a lot more fe
Ronen Bar
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
"Part one of our challenge is to solve the technical alignment problem, and that’s what everybody focuses on, but part two is: to whose values do you align the system once you’re capable of doing that, and that may turn out to be an even harder problem", Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO (Link).  In this post, I argue that: 1. "To whose values do you align the system" is a critically neglected space I termed “Moral Alignment.” Only a few organizations work for non-humans in this field, with a total budget of 4-5 million USD (not accounting for academic work). The scale of this space couldn’t be any bigger - the intersection between the most revolutionary technology ever and all sentient beings. While tractability remains uncertain, there is some promising positive evidence (See “The Tractability Open Question” section). 2. Given the first point, our movement must attract more resources, talent, and funding to address it. The goal is to value align AI with caring about all sentient beings: humans, animals, and potential future digital minds. In other words, I argue we should invest much more in promoting a sentient-centric AI. The problem What is Moral Alignment? AI alignment focuses on ensuring AI systems act according to human intentions, emphasizing controllability and corrigibility (adaptability to changing human preferences). However, traditional alignment often ignores the ethical implications for all sentient beings. Moral Alignment, as part of the broader AI alignment and AI safety spaces, is a field focused on the values we aim to instill in AI. I argue that our goal should be to ensure AI is a positive force for all sentient beings. Currently, as far as I know, no overarching organization, terms, or community unifies Moral Alignment (MA) as a field with a clear umbrella identity. While specific groups focus individually on animals, humans, or digital minds, such as AI for Animals, which does excellent community-building work around AI and animal welfare while