Hide table of contents

EAGxNordics is by now a well-established EA conference, running for the fourth year! For the first time, we are bringing this conference to Norway! Set in one of the (admittedly less impressive) fjords of Norway, EAGxNordics will be hosted in Norway’s capital - Oslo.

Although this conference primarily is targeted for EAs in the Nordics and Baltics, there are several reasons why you might be interested in attending this EAGx in particular, even if you live outside of those regions.

Only two weeks till applications close! Apply now to attend EAGxNordics in Oslo.

 

Who is this event for?

If you live in or are connected to the Nordics or Baltics, are familiar with the core ideas of effective altruism, and want to explore how to act on them—then this conference is for you. While we prioritise applications with connections to the Nordics and Baltics, we also welcome experienced EAs from around the world who can bring valuable perspectives and mentorship to the event.

EAGxNordics is a great opportunity for experienced community members from outside the region who are interested in expanding their network or seeking new opportunities. There are also some strategic choices made for this conference that might be of interest to a more international audience.

EAGxNordics will cover a breadth of topics, but some of the more distinct aspects of the event -  ones that might make it worth the trip from outside the region - include:

  • Personal mental health & support: Understanding mental health and how to navigate challenges like perfectionism, imposter syndrome, and burnout helps create a culture where people feel supported and can contribute sustainably over the long run. That’s why mental health & psychological well-being is a critical focus at EAGxNordics. Tim LeBon will be speaking on “How to overcome perfectionism and imposter syndrome: A CBT therapist's perspective” and Ewelina Tur will host a workshop about “Impact Without Burnout”. 
  • Upskilling & targeted advice for organisations: workshops like “Mastering Grant Applications: Strategies for Success with EA Funders” and “Open house: Get input and feedback on your theory of change and/or impact evaluation system” (hosted by EA Sweden) will likely draw a smaller audience, but be particularly impactful to those who attend.
  • Policy: The Nordics and Baltics are recognized for their leadership in evidence-based policy, from climate change to effective governance. Inspired by this, we are developing content on how policy can drive impact in key areas such as animal welfare, AI safety, and other global catastrophic risks.

 

Vision for the conference

Our main goal is to help form meaningful connections between EAs. If you’re new to EA, this conference will make you feel included in the community and help you find the next steps on your EA journey. If you’re an experienced EA, you’ll have plenty of opportunities to give and receive feedback, offer mentorship, and expand your network to maximise your impact.

EAGxNordics 2025 is aiming for a conference that is inclusive, supportive, and welcoming to all. We especially encourage women and underrepresented groups to apply. 

 

Satellite events 

Satellite events are unofficial social events that will take place before, during, and after the conference, and that will help you connect to more like-minded people outside of conference hours. Some examples include co-working, city tours, and after-party. 

 

Travel support

Travel support can be requested in the application. Rooms have been booked at a nearby hostel for all travel support recipients, making it easy to meet others, keep the interesting conversations going, and commute to the event together. EAGxNordics prioritises attendees from the Nordic and Baltic regions to build the local community.

 

Apply by April 8 to attend EAGxNordics in Oslo: Application link

If you have any questions or comments, don’t hesitate to reach out to nordics@eaglobalx.org.

10

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Although seats are filling up quickly, you can apply until April 8! Additionally, there is still more travel support available, that you can request while submitting the application. 

Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Ronen Bar
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
"Part one of our challenge is to solve the technical alignment problem, and that’s what everybody focuses on, but part two is: to whose values do you align the system once you’re capable of doing that, and that may turn out to be an even harder problem", Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO (Link).  In this post, I argue that: 1. "To whose values do you align the system" is a critically neglected space I termed “Moral Alignment.” Only a few organizations work for non-humans in this field, with a total budget of 4-5 million USD (not accounting for academic work). The scale of this space couldn’t be any bigger - the intersection between the most revolutionary technology ever and all sentient beings. While tractability remains uncertain, there is some promising positive evidence (See “The Tractability Open Question” section). 2. Given the first point, our movement must attract more resources, talent, and funding to address it. The goal is to value align AI with caring about all sentient beings: humans, animals, and potential future digital minds. In other words, I argue we should invest much more in promoting a sentient-centric AI. The problem What is Moral Alignment? AI alignment focuses on ensuring AI systems act according to human intentions, emphasizing controllability and corrigibility (adaptability to changing human preferences). However, traditional alignment often ignores the ethical implications for all sentient beings. Moral Alignment, as part of the broader AI alignment and AI safety spaces, is a field focused on the values we aim to instill in AI. I argue that our goal should be to ensure AI is a positive force for all sentient beings. Currently, as far as I know, no overarching organization, terms, or community unifies Moral Alignment (MA) as a field with a clear umbrella identity. While specific groups focus individually on animals, humans, or digital minds, such as AI for Animals, which does excellent community-building work around AI and animal welfare while
Max Taylor
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
Many thanks to Constance Li, Rachel Mason, Ronen Bar, Sam Tucker-Davis, and Yip Fai Tse for providing valuable feedback. This post does not necessarily reflect the views of my employer. Artificial General Intelligence (basically, ‘AI that is as good as, or better than, humans at most intellectual tasks’) seems increasingly likely to be developed in the next 5-10 years. As others have written, this has major implications for EA priorities, including animal advocacy, but it’s hard to know how this should shape our strategy. This post sets out a few starting points and I’m really interested in hearing others’ ideas, even if they’re very uncertain and half-baked. Is AGI coming in the next 5-10 years? This is very well covered elsewhere but basically it looks increasingly likely, e.g.: * The Metaculus and Manifold forecasting platforms predict we’ll see AGI in 2030 and 2031, respectively. * The heads of Anthropic and OpenAI think we’ll see it by 2027 and 2035, respectively. * A 2024 survey of AI researchers put a 50% chance of AGI by 2047, but this is 13 years earlier than predicted in the 2023 version of the survey. * These predictions seem feasible given the explosive rate of change we’ve been seeing in computing power available to models, algorithmic efficiencies, and actual model performance (e.g., look at how far Large Language Models and AI image generators have come just in the last three years). * Based on this, organisations (both new ones, like Forethought, and existing ones, like 80,000 Hours) are taking the prospect of near-term AGI increasingly seriously. What could AGI mean for animals? AGI’s implications for animals depend heavily on who controls the AGI models. For example: * AGI might be controlled by a handful of AI companies and/or governments, either in alliance or in competition. * For example, maybe two government-owned companies separately develop AGI then restrict others from developing it. * These actors’ use of AGI might be dr
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
46
Ivan Burduk
· · 2m read