Hide table of contents

What do I mean by “homegrown”? These projects are:

  • Local: Creators have a good track record in the EA or AI Safety community
  • Modest: The amount requested is not large; $5k would be meaningful
  • Overlooked: Not already backed by large institutional funders like OpenPhil

If you’re a small donor or earn to give, consider giving to projects like these:

1. Feature-length documentary on SB 1047

By Michael Trazzi — $16k raised of $55k

 

Michael has already recorded interviews with the main characters of SB 1047: sponsors like Scott Wiener and Dan Hendrycks, proponents like Zvi Mowshowitz and Holly Elmore, and opponents like Dean Ball and Timothy B Lee. Now he needs the funding to turn it into a 1-hour feature documentary. This is a rare chance to sponsor a high-quality video narrative, and share it beyond our existing ecosystem. I’ve personally donated $10k towards this, and expect Michael to be able to effectively use much more.

More info & donate here: https://manifund.org/projects/finishing-the-sb-1047-documentary-in-6-weeks

2. Overview of AI Safety in 2024

By Gavin Leech — $8k of $17.6k raised

Gavin Leech is a forecaster, researcher and founder of Arb; he’s proposing to re-rerun a 2023 survey of AI Safety. The landscape shifts pretty quickly, so I’d love to see what’s changed since last year.

As I was writing this, regrantor Neel Nanda funded it to the minimum $8k ask! Neel adds:

I think collections like this add significant value to newcomers to the field, mostly by being a list of all areas worth maybe thinking about, and key links (rather than eg by providing a lot of takes on which areas are more or less important, unless the author has excellent taste). Gavin has convinced me that the previous post gets enough traffic for it be valuable to be kept up to date.

More info & donate here: https://manifund.org/projects/shallow-review-of-ai-safety-2024

3. Podcast series on Effective Altruism’s values

By Elizabeth Van Nostrand — $1.3k raised of $2.6k

Elizabeth & Timothy’s initial podcast was very well received, drawing extensive, thoughtful comments from a variety of folks. I’d be excited to see them continue this series, especially if they bring in folks involved with steering the EA community (like Sarah Cheng, who has extensively engaged with their points)

More info & donate here: https://manifund.org/projects/elizabeth-and-timothy-podcast-on-values-in-effective-altruism

4. Sentinel, a foresight and emergency response team

By Nuno Sempere — $16k raised of $90k

Nuno has long been one of our community’s most outspoken forecasters; now he’s working with Rai Sur to spin up an emergency response team (think: Army Reserve Corps, but for responding to existential risks). They’re already putting out a useful weekly report on biosecurity, geopolitics and other such topics.

More info & donate here: https://manifund.org/projects/fund-sentinel-for-q4-2024

5. Research on co-occurence of sparse autoencoder latents

By Matthew A. Clarke — $0 raised of $6.4k

TBH, I don’t know much about the merits for or against this line of research; I’m highlighting this grant because it’s overseen by Joseph Bloom, a past Manifund grantee who I and others have been very impressed with. If mechanistic interpretability is your jam, check this one out!

More info & donate here: https://manifund.org/projects/salaries-for-sae-co-occurrence-project

 

What else have we been up to?

It’s been a quiet couple of months, but here’s what Rachel and I have been busy with:

 

Cheers,

Austin

 

PS: want to make a larger grant? Manifund can facilitate donations via donor advised funds, crypto, and bank transfers.

50

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

I work at Open Philanthropy, and I recently let Gavin know that Open Phil is planning to recommend a grant of $5k to Arb for the second project on your list: Overview of AI Safety in 2024 (they had already raised ~$10k by the time we came across it). Thanks for writing this post Austin — it brought the funding opportunity to our attention.

Like other commenters on Manifund, I believe this kind of overview is a valuable reference for the field, especially for newcomers. 

I wanted to flag that this project would have been eligible for our RFP for work that builds capacity to address risks from transformative AI. I worry that not all potential applicants are aware of the RFP or its scope, so I’ll take this opportunity to mention that this RFP’s scope is quite broad, including funding for: 

  • Training and mentorship programs
  • Events
  • Groups
  • Resources, media, and communications
  • Almost any other type of project that builds capacity for advanced AI risks (in the sense of increasing the number of careers devoted to these problems, supporting people doing this work, and sharing knowledge related to this work). 

More details at the link above. People might also find this page helpful, which lists all currently open application programs at Open Phil. 

Curated and popular this week
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Ronen Bar
 ·  · 10m read
 · 
"Part one of our challenge is to solve the technical alignment problem, and that’s what everybody focuses on, but part two is: to whose values do you align the system once you’re capable of doing that, and that may turn out to be an even harder problem", Sam Altman, OpenAI CEO (Link).  In this post, I argue that: 1. "To whose values do you align the system" is a critically neglected space I termed “Moral Alignment.” Only a few organizations work for non-humans in this field, with a total budget of 4-5 million USD (not accounting for academic work). The scale of this space couldn’t be any bigger - the intersection between the most revolutionary technology ever and all sentient beings. While tractability remains uncertain, there is some promising positive evidence (See “The Tractability Open Question” section). 2. Given the first point, our movement must attract more resources, talent, and funding to address it. The goal is to value align AI with caring about all sentient beings: humans, animals, and potential future digital minds. In other words, I argue we should invest much more in promoting a sentient-centric AI. The problem What is Moral Alignment? AI alignment focuses on ensuring AI systems act according to human intentions, emphasizing controllability and corrigibility (adaptability to changing human preferences). However, traditional alignment often ignores the ethical implications for all sentient beings. Moral Alignment, as part of the broader AI alignment and AI safety spaces, is a field focused on the values we aim to instill in AI. I argue that our goal should be to ensure AI is a positive force for all sentient beings. Currently, as far as I know, no overarching organization, terms, or community unifies Moral Alignment (MA) as a field with a clear umbrella identity. While specific groups focus individually on animals, humans, or digital minds, such as AI for Animals, which does excellent community-building work around AI and animal welfare while