Emotions are good. Politeness is bimodal. 'Informality is friendly' and 'informality is creepy' are the ground states. Jokes reframe wrongness as funnyness; the Rationalism movement looks, from the real outside, like a bunch of supremely edgy computer cultists.
This is why it was a really bad idea to frame knowledge of statistics as a conspiracy thing. If you think of your better judgement as a secret hat, then you will dedicate resources to keeping how smart you are a secret.
You are, presumably, a rational actor. But who are you, generically? What are the outer limits of your selfhood? Are you satisfied with them? Why or why not?
Discuss.
The EAF is using LessWrong 2.0 forum architecture, which shapes its' culture tremendously. In particular, there's a general expectation that good criticism has to be longwinded.
That said, this is a very helpful summary of what locals think is going on. Thank you!