Hide table of contents

Previous: Giving more won't make you happier

This evening, I was listening to this old episode of EconTalk (a), wherein Richard Epstein discusses income, wealth, and happiness:

Theory of revealed preferences. We see people working hard to get raises. The happiness literature suggests that everyone is under a deep delusion about what makes them happy, and the guys running the survey know better.
Methodological fallacy: data seem to suggest that when you have higher incomes you don't necessarily have a whole lot higher level of happiness... People make a pact – I'll be miserable for a few years if you'll make me rich in the longer run.
So, in the short run they report being less happy. They don't want to be unhappy forever, so eventually they'll take a lower paying job – and report being happier.

This consideration – people with intense, high-paying jobs being less happy when surveyed but (knowingly) doing this for increased future happiness – seems important when thinking about the happiness<>income relationship. We totally overlooked it in the recent Forum post.

Does anyone know of longitudinal studies that look at happiness of people over time, as they move into and out of high-intensity jobs?

I'd like to learn more about this.

8

0
0

Reactions

0
0
New Answer
New Comment


Comments2
Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

I'd also expect people to do a thing of taking high-paying jobs with the expectation that it benefits their children more than their own happiness. I don't know if there's evidence on that.

That definitely matches my intuition too.

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 11m read
 · 
Does a food carbon tax increase animal deaths and/or the total time of suffering of cows, pigs, chickens, and fish? Theoretically, this is possible, as a carbon tax could lead consumers to substitute, for example, beef with chicken. However, this is not per se the case, as animal products are not perfect substitutes.  I'm presenting the results of my master's thesis in Environmental Economics, which I re-worked and published on SSRN as a pre-print. My thesis develops a model of animal product substitution after a carbon tax, slaughter tax, and a meat tax. When I calibrate[1] this model for the U.S., there is a decrease in animal deaths and duration of suffering following a carbon tax. This suggests that a carbon tax can reduce animal suffering. Key points * Some animal products are carbon-intensive, like beef, but causes relatively few animal deaths or total time of suffering because the animals are large. Other animal products, like chicken, causes relatively many animal deaths or total time of suffering because the animals are small, but cause relatively low greenhouse gas emissions. * A carbon tax will make some animal products, like beef, much more expensive. As a result, people may buy more chicken. This would increase animal suffering, assuming that farm animals suffer. However, this is not per se the case. It is also possible that the direct negative effect of a carbon tax on chicken consumption is stronger than the indirect (positive) substitution effect from carbon-intensive products to chicken. * I developed a non-linear market model to predict the consumption of different animal products after a tax, based on own-price and cross-price elasticities. * When calibrated for the United States, this model predicts a decrease in the consumption of all animal products considered (beef, chicken, pork, and farmed fish). Therefore, the modelled carbon tax is actually good for animal welfare, assuming that animals live net-negative lives. * A slaughter tax (a
MarieF🔸
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Summary * After >2 years at Hi-Med, I have decided to step down from my role. * This allows me to complete my medical residency for long-term career resilience, whilst still allowing part-time flexibility for direct charity work. It also allows me to donate more again. * Hi-Med is now looking to appoint its next Executive Director; the application deadline is 26 January 2025. * I will join Hi-Med’s governing board once we have appointed the next Executive Director. Before the role When I graduated from medical school in 2017, I had already started to give 10% of my income to effective charities, but I was unsure as to how I could best use my medical degree to make this world a better place. After dipping my toe into nonprofit fundraising (with Doctors Without Borders) and working in a medical career-related start-up to upskill, a talk given by Dixon Chibanda at EAG London 2018 deeply inspired me. I formed a rough plan to later found an organisation that would teach Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-specific psychotherapeutic techniques to lay people to make evidence-based treatment of PTSD scalable. I started my medical residency in psychosomatic medicine in 2019, working for a specialised clinic for PTSD treatment until 2021, then rotated to child and adolescent psychiatry for a year and was half a year into the continuation of my specialisation training at a third hospital, when Akhil Bansal, whom I met at a recent EAG in London, reached out and encouraged me to apply for the ED position at Hi-Med - an organisation that I knew through my participation in their introductory fellowship (an academic paper about the outcomes of this first cohort can be found here). I seized the opportunity, applied, was offered the position, and started working full-time in November 2022.  During the role I feel truly privileged to have had the opportunity to lead High Impact Medicine for the past two years. My learning curve was steep - there were so many new things to
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
Tl;DR: Fill out the one-question-form below to let us know if you’d be willing to try out a free Growth & Wellbeing platform for EAs. Share Your Interest in RISE The Gist Over the past few months, we’ve been exploring an idea that’s received a lot of enthusiasm from EA community members, psychologists, coaches, and the community health team: creating a platform tailored to the unique mental health and personal growth challenges faced by EA-affiliated and similar individuals. This project would provide interventions designed by EA-familiar psychologists and coaches, addressing challenges common to EAs, such as impostor syndrome, burnout, perfectionism, anxiety, and more. For example, many EAs have reported feelings of self-doubt or decision paralysis when navigating the complexity of global cause areas or the emotional toll of working on catastrophic risks. These plans can be further customized by users to fit their specific needs and circumstances. Before fully committing, we’d love your input: Would you use a platform like this? Do you see value in having a dedicated tool to support psychological well-being and personal growth in the EA community? Why This Matters * Community Need: Internal surveys and community discussions (for instance: self-care, burnout) have surfaced common well-being challenges within the movement. Many community members report stress, self-doubt, and burnout difficulties. While these are common human struggles, the high-stakes nature of EA work and its unique contexts—like longtermism, existential-risk projects, or navigating uncertainty about career paths—can make them even more pronounced. Improving well-being and personal growth not only enhances individual quality of life but also strengthens the community’s overall effectiveness. * Personalization Gap: Mainstream self-help many times fails because it doesn’t adapt well to the individual’s unique situation. This Project aims to bridge this gap by offering community-tailored prac
Relevant opportunities