I'm a high-school student considering research careers. Academic research is an important field in most cause areas of EA. But there are some obstacles to being a researcher/professor: You may not be able to go in a EA -related company. So we need to work with non-EAs. Due to the topics what EA wants to research is probably not what companies/government want you to research. It's like the basic research in biology is more neglected than the clinical research. EA research may seems less attractive to non-EAs. I have some worries on this: 1.It may be harder for EAs to get a professor job in academics, so as promoting. If you don't have enough money, it'll be a big pressure. 2.Is it hard to apply enough funds for the EA topics, such as: animal welfare, space governance, AI safety/sentience. People may not want to invest onto this. How do we overcome these obstacles?
Actually, I think there are plenty of ways for academic researchers to find funding & support for investigating EA ideas! Check out the 80,000 Hours job board filtered for entry-level and junior-level "research" careers. We've got lots of options:
It's true that (sadly!) most of these organizations aren't laser-focused on what EA considers to be the most important problems. But these organizations often have a broad agenda to do lots of research within general areas (like "improving public health") that include highly-impactful research questions (like "What are the best ways to defend against a future pandemic?") So, it's often possible for academic researchers like you to choose their detailed focus for maximum impact, and still get plenty of support and funding from big traditional organizations like governments, universities, and think tanks.
Thanks for your response very much, it helps me a lot. I'm not so familiar in academics. You said we can solve pandemic risks by working in public health areas. Then what non-EA academia departments give AI safety or space governance researchers chance to work in? Thus, will there be problems when researching unpopular/long-term topics, such as: not getting enough funds, paper not cited enough by non-EAs, hard to promote to professor...?
Just look at that link to the 80,000 Hours job board for more examples! Some opportunities in AI:
Maybe you are thinking that "unpopular" research means "controversial, despised, taboo, likely to get you cancelled or fired" -- like doing research into heated political topics?? But the areas you've talked about (animal welfare, AI alignment, biosecurity, etc) aren't "unpopular" meaning "controversial or dangerous". They are just "unpopular" meaning "rare" -- they are niche specialties that most people haven't heard of. But most types of academic research are similarly niche! I don't think that the kinds of research promoted on the 80,000 Hours job board will be any impediment to career advancement -- in fact, because you are researching things that actually matter to a large community of philanthropists, activists, etc, researching EA topics is probably better for your career than researching most other niche topics.