This is a special post for quick takes by Alex Berg. Only they can create top-level comments. Comments here also appear on the Quick Takes page and All Posts page.
Sorted by Click to highlight new quick takes since:

Models or goals that require continuous growth tend to be unsustainable. Looking at nature, most living organisms have a finite mature form.

Systems like GDP are great in a stage of economic growth, but once a mature economy has developed GDP no longer indicates economic improvement.

Similarly, population growth is useful for expansion, but in my opinion not necessarily a valuable goal in the world right now. Although some might be wary of the consequences of population stagnancy or decline, there are actions that can be taken if those in leadership foresee and accept these situations. Some of the most prominent modern population realities and consequences are described in detail by polling expert Dr. Darrel Bricker in The Inquiring Mind Podcast ep. 40.

Interesting. I'm not generally around people who believe population growth is important. I thought that was more a thing that unstable politicians cared about. I think it's more about voting in representative leadership than trying to cater to leaders that aren't interested in being rational. 

Curated and popular this week
Relevant opportunities