Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by Ryan Kidd, Jana, Laura Vaughan, yams
7 min read 0

18

AI safetyOpportunities to take actionApplication announcementsBuilding the field of AI safetyJob listing (open)
Frontpage

If you are interested in supporting the development of research projects and researchers in AI safety, the MATS team is currently hiring for Community Manager, Research Manager, and Operations Generalist roles and would love to hear from you. Please apply by Nov 3 to join our team for the Winter 2024-25 Program over the period of Dec 9-Apr 11. Most open roles have the possibility of long-term extension depending on performance and program needs.

Introduction

The ML Alignment & Theory Scholars (MATS) program aims to find and train talented individuals for what we see as the world’s most urgent and talent-constrained problem: reducing risks from unaligned artificial intelligence. We believe that ambitious young researchers from a variety of backgrounds have the potential to contribute to the field of alignment research. We aim to provide the mentorship, curriculum, financial support, and community necessary to aid this transition. Please see our theory of change and website for more details.

We are generally looking for candidates who:

  • Are excited to work in a fast-paced environment and are comfortable switching responsibilities and projects as the needs of MATS change;
  • Want to help the team with high-level strategy;
  • Are self-motivated and can take on new responsibilities within MATS over time and;
  • Care about what is best for the long-term future, independent of MATS’ interests.

Please apply via this form.

Community Manager

We are expanding the MATS Community Health Team and are looking for an individual with strong interpersonal skills who will work with the Community Management Lead and the rest of the MATS team to support the needs of scholars and improve the MATS community. Ideal candidates are excited about AI safety field-building and enjoy supporting others.

Responsibilities

A Community Manager needs to be proactive and responsive to MATS scholars’ needs and able to enhance scholar experience through personal conversations, mediation, event planning, and documentation of community health concerns. This role reports primarily to the Community Management Lead and to the Executive Team. Specific responsibilities will vary according to applicant experience and interests, and may change depending on program needs. However, you can expect tasks like:

  • Meeting with scholars to get to know them and learn about their needs, provide emotional support, talk through scholar challenges, and receive community feedback;
  • Coordinating with the Community Management Lead about scholar needs;
  • Collaborate with Research Management and Operations teams, as needed, to support scholars;
  • Supporting scholar orientation and offboarding;
  • Organizing and supervising socials, networking events, and workshops (for example, hosting board game nights, hikes, 1-on-1 speed networking, remote scholar events, lightning talks, and more);
  • Setting up and monitoring systems, e.g. writing surveys and analyzing data, to improve the program based on scholar feedback;
  • Staying aware of the cohort’s physical and mental health and connecting scholars with appropriate resources.

We are a small team running a large program, so we expect team members to enthusiastically take on tasks unrelated to their job title. For example, MATS team members have compiled a MATS Alumni Impact Analysis and conducted analyses for internal use and external publication. 

Criteria

  • US work authorization required;
  • Located in or willing to move to Berkeley, CA;

We encourage you to apply even if you are not sure that you sufficiently meet all of the following criteria:

  • Experience providing emotional support and mediating conflicts, ideally in a setting similar to MATS (e.g., as a university peer counselor);
  • Strong interpersonal skills (e.g., patience);
  • High cognitive empathy;
  • Knowledge of emotional regulation tools;
  • Autonomy and proactivity;
  • Comfortable working with private and confidential information;
  • Able to function in urgent and/or high-stakes situations, if necessary;
  • Some data analysis skills a plus, but not required;
  • Ideally, some knowledge of AI safety-specific concerns that sometimes bear on community health (e.g., "doomerism," "infohazards," etc.).

Details

Compensation will be $43-57/h, depending on experience. Must be willing to work from Berkeley, CA. Office space, catered lunches and dinners, and health, dental, and vision insurance are provided for full-time workers. Estimated 40 hours per week from December 9 to April 11, 2024 (with a one-week break Dec 23-27), potentially continuing beyond this depending on performance and program needs.

Applying

Please apply via this form.

Research Manager

We are looking for resourceful generalists with strong project management, critical thinking, and interpersonal skills to enhance the effectiveness of the MATS program. As a Research Manager, you will help coordinate and support our research scholars and mentors, playing a pivotal role in empowering AI safety researchers.

Overview

This role involves weekly meetings with scholars and their mentors to support research output and scholar development over the program. A great Research Manager is able to quickly familiarize themselves with scholars’ research at a high level and help mentors and scholars achieve program outcomes, including high-impact publications, successful grant applications, and career development. Additionally, you will dedicate up to 10-15 hours per week to "special projects" such as applicant selection, workshop coordination, and program impact evaluation.

Strong candidates are particularly excited about problem-solving, project coordination, and empowering AI safety researchers. Bonus qualities include: AI safety or machine learning (ML) research or engineering experience, experience and connections within the AI safety ecosystem, experience managing small teams, and pedagogical knowledge or experience. This is a four-month position with the possibility of long-term extension depending on performance and program needs.

Details

Compensation will be $44-62/h, depending on experience. Must be willing to work from Berkeley, CA. Office space, catered lunches and dinners, and health, dental, and vision insurance are provided for full-time workers. Estimated 40 hours per week from December 9 to April 11, 2024 (with a one-week break Dec 23-27), potentially continuing beyond this depending on performance and program needs. We are also able to accommodate workers working as little as 30 h/week.

Responsibilities

A research manager’s primary role is to help scholars and mentors achieve program goals, as well as accelerate and enhance scholar development through the MATS program via personalized support. This role reports primarily to the Research Management Lead and to the Executive Team for special projects. Specific responsibilities will change depending on cohort and program needs, but you can expect tasks like:

  • Meeting with mentors to understand their vision and needs over the program;
  • Meeting with scholars to provide 1-1 research support, mentor meeting preparation, accountability, goal planning, and career advice;
  • Hosting daily or weekly standup meetings for scholars;
  • Performing regular check-ins with scholars via text, phone, virtually, or in-person;
  • Reviewing program deliverables (e.g., research plans, symposium talks, grant applications, papers, blog posts) with scholars and giving feedback;
  • Assisting with various aspects of program administration (i.e., “special projects”) where your skills align (e.g., rubrics for milestone deliverables, running workshops, curriculum planning, data analysis, applicant selection, mentor selection);
  • Directing scholars towards appropriate resources to help them flourish throughout the MATS program, including referring scholars to the Community Management Lead or Executive Team where appropriate;
  • Relaying trends in scholar needs or stress points as well as any specific questions or concerns to the team lead and executive team when appropriate;
  • Participating in regular Research Management team meetings and 1-1s with the team lead to check in and troubleshoot any issues holding scholars back.

Criteria

  • US work authorization required;
  • Must be willing to work from Berkeley, CA.

We encourage you to apply even if you are not sure that you sufficiently meet all of the following criteria:

  • Time management and project management skills (e.g. Getting Things Done);
  • Ability to solve abstract problems;
  • Enjoyment from helping others (e.g., “servant leadership”);
  • Familiarity with AI safety-specific concerns (e.g., “doomerism,” “dual-use” research, “infohazards,” etc.);
  • Eagerness to continue learning new problem-solving methods and tools (e.g., backchaining, builder/breaker methodology, crux decomposition);
  • Well-developed “theory of mind” (people-modeling skills) and cognitive empathy;
  • Autonomy and proactivity, especially if/when friction points arise;
  • An understanding of discretion, as well as the ability to maintain confidentiality where predefined boundaries exist;
  • Bonus: a background in AI safety, interpretability, or governance.

Applying

Please apply via this form.

Operations Generalist

We’re looking for proactive and dedicated operations professionals to help the program run smoothly. As an Operations Generalist at MATS, you’ll support scholars, mentors, and team members by facilitating ease and community such that they might better focus on the content of their work.

Details

Compensation will be $36-48/h, depending on experience. Must be willing to work from Berkeley, CA. Office space, catered lunches and dinners, and health, dental, and vision insurance are provided for full-time workers. Estimated 40 hours per week from December 9 to April 11, 2024 (with a one-week break Dec 23-27), potentially continuing beyond this depending on performance and program needs.

Responsibilities

Operations Generalists at MATS perform a wide variety of duties. For this particular hire, we have in mind:

  • Managing office guests
  • Interfacing with external parties (like the contractors who help maintain our office space)
  • Helping run social events and parties
  • Addressing scholar needs, however they may arise

The core task of the role will be addressing office requests from scholars, mentors, and team members, to help keep things running smoothly for them (i..e sourcing equipment, investigating potential maintenance concerns, etc). However, the ideal candidate would be willing to greet any challenge or special project that may appear over the course of the cohort. Depending on experience, you will be expected either to own these projects (with guidance from William, our Operations Lead), or to help William run them.

Criteria

  • US work authorization required;
  • Must be willing to work from Berkeley, CA.

Applying

Please apply via this form.

18

0
0

Reactions

0
0

More posts like this

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
More from Ryan Kidd
46
Implications of the inference scaling paradigm for AI safety
Ryan Kidd
·
5
5
90
Why I funded PIBBSS
Ryan Kidd
·
2
2
79
How MATS addresses “mass movement building” concerns
Ryan Kidd
·
4
4
View more
Curated and popular this week
LintzA
 ·  · 15m read
 · 
Cross-posted to Lesswrong Introduction Several developments over the past few months should cause you to re-evaluate what you are doing. These include: 1. Updates toward short timelines 2. The Trump presidency 3. The o1 (inference-time compute scaling) paradigm 4. Deepseek 5. Stargate/AI datacenter spending 6. Increased internal deployment 7. Absence of AI x-risk/safety considerations in mainstream AI discourse Taken together, these are enough to render many existing AI governance strategies obsolete (and probably some technical safety strategies too). There's a good chance we're entering crunch time and that should absolutely affect your theory of change and what you plan to work on. In this piece I try to give a quick summary of these developments and think through the broader implications these have for AI safety. At the end of the piece I give some quick initial thoughts on how these developments affect what safety-concerned folks should be prioritizing. These are early days and I expect many of my takes will shift, look forward to discussing in the comments!  Implications of recent developments Updates toward short timelines There’s general agreement that timelines are likely to be far shorter than most expected. Both Sam Altman and Dario Amodei have recently said they expect AGI within the next 3 years. Anecdotally, nearly everyone I know or have heard of who was expecting longer timelines has updated significantly toward short timelines (<5 years). E.g. Ajeya’s median estimate is that 99% of fully-remote jobs will be automatable in roughly 6-8 years, 5+ years earlier than her 2023 estimate. On a quick look, prediction markets seem to have shifted to short timelines (e.g. Metaculus[1] & Manifold appear to have roughly 2030 median timelines to AGI, though haven’t moved dramatically in recent months). We’ve consistently seen performance on benchmarks far exceed what most predicted. Most recently, Epoch was surprised to see OpenAI’s o3 model achi
Dr Kassim
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Hey everyone, I’ve been going through the EA Introductory Program, and I have to admit some of these ideas make sense, but others leave me with more questions than answers. I’m trying to wrap my head around certain core EA principles, and the more I think about them, the more I wonder: Am I misunderstanding, or are there blind spots in EA’s approach? I’d really love to hear what others think. Maybe you can help me clarify some of my doubts. Or maybe you share the same reservations? Let’s talk. Cause Prioritization. Does It Ignore Political and Social Reality? EA focuses on doing the most good per dollar, which makes sense in theory. But does it hold up when you apply it to real world contexts especially in countries like Uganda? Take malaria prevention. It’s a top EA cause because it’s highly cost effective $5,000 can save a life through bed nets (GiveWell, 2023). But what happens when government corruption or instability disrupts these programs? The Global Fund scandal in Uganda saw $1.6 million in malaria aid mismanaged (Global Fund Audit Report, 2016). If money isn’t reaching the people it’s meant to help, is it really the best use of resources? And what about leadership changes? Policies shift unpredictably here. A national animal welfare initiative I supported lost momentum when political priorities changed. How does EA factor in these uncertainties when prioritizing causes? It feels like EA assumes a stable world where money always achieves the intended impact. But what if that’s not the world we live in? Long termism. A Luxury When the Present Is in Crisis? I get why long termists argue that future people matter. But should we really prioritize them over people suffering today? Long termism tells us that existential risks like AI could wipe out trillions of future lives. But in Uganda, we’re losing lives now—1,500+ die from rabies annually (WHO, 2021), and 41% of children suffer from stunting due to malnutrition (UNICEF, 2022). These are preventable d
Paul Present
 ·  · 28m read
 · 
Note: I am not a malaria expert. This is my best-faith attempt at answering a question that was bothering me, but this field is a large and complex field, and I’ve almost certainly misunderstood something somewhere along the way. Summary While the world made incredible progress in reducing malaria cases from 2000 to 2015, the past 10 years have seen malaria cases stop declining and start rising. I investigated potential reasons behind this increase through reading the existing literature and looking at publicly available data, and I identified three key factors explaining the rise: 1. Population Growth: Africa's population has increased by approximately 75% since 2000. This alone explains most of the increase in absolute case numbers, while cases per capita have remained relatively flat since 2015. 2. Stagnant Funding: After rapid growth starting in 2000, funding for malaria prevention plateaued around 2010. 3. Insecticide Resistance: Mosquitoes have become increasingly resistant to the insecticides used in bednets over the past 20 years. This has made older models of bednets less effective, although they still have some effect. Newer models of bednets developed in response to insecticide resistance are more effective but still not widely deployed.  I very crudely estimate that without any of these factors, there would be 55% fewer malaria cases in the world than what we see today. I think all three of these factors are roughly equally important in explaining the difference.  Alternative explanations like removal of PFAS, climate change, or invasive mosquito species don't appear to be major contributors.  Overall this investigation made me more convinced that bednets are an effective global health intervention.  Introduction In 2015, malaria rates were down, and EAs were celebrating. Giving What We Can posted this incredible gif showing the decrease in malaria cases across Africa since 2000: Giving What We Can said that > The reduction in malaria has be
Recent opportunities in AI safety
15
Applications Open: Pivotal 2025 Q3 Research Fellowship
2 authors
· · 2m read
0
0
19
Hiring pre-docs
Eva
· · 1m read
0
0
4
Register for the Stanford Existential Risks Initiative (SERI) Symposium
Grant Higerd-Rusli
· · 1m read
0
0
View more