Hide table of contents

These monthly posts originated as the "Updates" section of the EA Newsletter.

You can also see last month's updates, or a repository of past newsletters (including past organization updates).

 

Organization Updates

80,000 Hours

80,000 Hours launched a new key ideas page, which replaces their previous career guide.

The key ideas page covers the most useful things they've learned over the last eight years, starting with the big picture and ending with practical next steps. It's now the natural place for people to go first if they want to learn what 80,000 Hours thinks about doing good with your career.

They also posted over 100 new vacancies on their job board and released a podcast on computer security careers, election integrity, and global catastrophic risks with Bruce Schneier.

 

Animal Charity Evaluators

Animal Charity Evaluators published a post highlighting the most recent updates to their charity evaluation process. This year’s changes include modifying their cost-effectiveness models and adding overall ratings for each charity on each criterion. They also published part two in a series of roundtable posts about the culture of remote organizations.

 

Berkeley Existential Risk Initiative

BERI is currently seeking an Operations Manager. The job description and application are available on their website.

 

Center for Human-Compatible AI (UC Berkeley)

Stuart Russell’s new book is now for sale on Amazon and at other retailers. Russell explains why superhuman AI presents a problem for humanity and proposes a path toward solutions. Daniel Kahneman (Nobel Laureate in Economics) calls it "the most important book I have read in quite some time,” and Elon Musk endorsed it on Twitter

Rachel Freedman (a PhD student researcher) worked with Duke University’s Moral AI team to publish “Adapting a Kidney Exchange Algorithm to Align with Human Values”. The paper presents an end-to-end methodology for identifying and quantifying human value frameworks that affect kidney allocation, incorporating these into the donor-matching algorithm used for the U.S. national kidney exchange, and running simulations to evaluate the impact of this modified algorithm on matching.

CHAI is currently accepting intern applications for the 2020 internship program (start date: May 2020 preferred, other options possible). 

Finally, Martin Fukui has been officially chosen as CHAI’s new Assistant Director. 

 

Centre for Effective Altruism

CEA published:

They also released a set of new features for the EA Forum, including the ability to subscribe by email to users, posts, and comments.

Finally, they announced that Max Dalton has been appointed as CEA's Executive Director.

 

Centre for the Study of Existential Risk

 

Charity Entrepreneurship

Charity Entrepreneurship has released a series of videos introducing new effective charities incubated in their program: Fish Welfare Initiative, Suvita, Animal Advocacy Careers, Good Policies, and the Happier Lives Institute

They also posted a video explaining why supporting charity entrepreneurs is a high-impact opportunity, as well as reports on how research is an impactful intervention for animals and ways to evaluate potential asks that animal organizations can make of corporations.

 

Faunalytics

Faunalytics published their new research priorities for 2020, including studies on farmed chickens and fishes, corporate welfare reforms, and cultural barriers in non-Western countries. They also published a capstone of their 12-year longitudinal survey of animal-related attitudes and behavior, and an analysis showing which demographic groups are least likely to support animal causes

 

Forethought Foundation for Global Priorities Research

The Forethought Foundation has just opened applications for the Global Priorities Fellowship, which comes with a £5,000 stipend and a trip to Oxford in the summer of 2020. This philosophy and economics fellowship supports promising PhD and master’s students in contributing to global priorities research, with a particular focus on longtermism.

 

Future of Life Institute

FLI released an episode of their namesake podcast featuring Anthony Aguirre, as well as an episode of the AI Alignment Podcast featuring Stuart Russell. They are continuing their podcast series on climate change, Not Cool, with new episodes every Tuesday and Thursday through the end of November. 

 

GiveWell

In time for giving season, GiveWell explained what its standout charities are and how individuals can help increase GiveWell's impact. GiveWell also described why it recommended a $5.6 million GiveWell Incubation Grant to Results for Development to support the organization's pneumonia treatment program in Tanzania.

 

Global Catastrophic Risk Institute

GCRI is hosting a session on global catastrophic risk at the 2019 Society for Risk Analysis meeting in Arlington, VA. GCRI Director of Research Tony Barrett will chair the session, which will feature talks by Gary Ackerman, Paul Slovic, Arden Rowell, and GCRI's Seth Baum and Jared Brown.

 

Global Priorities Institute

The Global Priorities Institute has just opened applications for next year’s Early Career Conference Programme (ECCP). The programme takes place in Oxford from 6 June to 4 July 2020 and allows philosophy and economics graduate students to come to GPI to work on a research project and take part in the conference. Applications close on 10 January 2020.

 

The Good Food Institute

GFI published a post on the ways that plant-based meat is transforming the food industry from the inside. Science Blog released an interview with GFI’s Dr. Liz Specht: Is The Future Alternative Meats? (For more, see GFI’s full monthly report for October.)

 

Open Philanthropy Project

The Open Philanthropy Project announced grants including $19.5M to the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and $2.2M to Compassion in World Farming. They also published a blog post looking at the feasibility of long-range forecasting

 

Ought

Ought published an update summarizing its research progress. Over the past 10 months, 60+ participants have been working for 150+ total hours/week on factored evaluation experiments. In the update, Ought describes the structure of its experiments and shares what it has learned about the importance of developing decompositions in-house, work ensembling, and controlling branching in decomposition trees. The update also describes Ought’s work on gauging language models’ ability to automate similar work. 

 

Rethink Charity

Rethink Charity recently closed the window for EA Survey 2019 submissions. Within the next few weeks, they plan to begin publishing a series of posts with analysis and commentary on the results. Rethink Priorities recently published an analysis of the impacts of cat predation on animal welfare, explored the value of deliberative democracy reforms, and, as part of their series on invertebrates, published some opinions on estimating the probability of invertebrate sentience.

 

Add your own update

If your organization isn't represented in this list, you're welcome to provide an update in a comment.

You can also email me if you'd like to be included on the list of organizations I ask for updates each month; I can then add any updates you submit to future posts. (I may not accept all such requests; whether I include an org depends on its size, age, focus, track record, etc.)

 

Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

The Global Challenges Foundation ( https://globalchallenges.org/ ) has a lot of information really relevant for EAs. They care about improving cooperation among countries to reduce global catastrophic risks. I strongly recommend adding them in those updates. They have a newsletter.

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Science just released an article, with an accompanying technical report, about a neglected source of biological risk. From the abstract of the technical report: > This report describes the technical feasibility of creating mirror bacteria and the potentially serious and wide-ranging risks that they could pose to humans, other animals, plants, and the environment...  > > In a mirror bacterium, all of the chiral molecules of existing bacteria—proteins, nucleic acids, and metabolites—are replaced by their mirror images. Mirror bacteria could not evolve from existing life, but their creation will become increasingly feasible as science advances. Interactions between organisms often depend on chirality, and so interactions between natural organisms and mirror bacteria would be profoundly different from those between natural organisms. Most importantly, immune defenses and predation typically rely on interactions between chiral molecules that could often fail to detect or kill mirror bacteria due to their reversed chirality. It therefore appears plausible, even likely, that sufficiently robust mirror bacteria could spread through the environment unchecked by natural biological controls and act as dangerous opportunistic pathogens in an unprecedentedly wide range of other multicellular organisms, including humans. > > This report draws on expertise from synthetic biology, immunology, ecology, and related fields to provide the first comprehensive assessment of the risks from mirror bacteria.  Open Philanthropy helped to support this work and is now supporting the Mirror Biology Dialogues Fund (MBDF), along with the Sloan Foundation, the Packard Foundation, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and Patrick Collison. The Fund will coordinate scientific efforts to evaluate and address risks from mirror bacteria. It was deeply concerning to learn about this risk, but gratifying to see how seriously the scientific community is taking the issue. Given the potential infoha
 ·  · 14m read
 · 
1. Introduction My blog, Reflective Altruism, aims to use academic research to drive positive change within and around the effective altruism movement. Part of that mission involves engagement with the effective altruism community. For this reason, I try to give periodic updates on blog content and future directions (previous updates: here and here) In today’s post, I want to say a bit about new content published in 2024 (Sections 2-3) and give an overview of other content published so far (Section 4). I’ll also say a bit about upcoming content (Section 5) as well as my broader academic work (Section 6) and talks (Section 7) related to longtermism. Section 8 concludes with a few notes about other changes to the blog. I would be keen to hear reactions to existing content or suggestions for new content. Thanks for reading. 2. New series this year I’ve begun five new series since last December. 1. Against the singularity hypothesis: One of the most prominent arguments for existential risk from artificial agents is the singularity hypothesis. The singularity hypothesis holds roughly that self-improving artificial agents will grow at an accelerating rate until they are orders of magnitude more intelligent than the average human. I think that the singularity hypothesis is not on as firm ground as many advocates believe. My paper, “Against the singularity hypothesis,” makes the case for this conclusion. I’ve written a six-part series Against the singularity hypothesis summarizing this paper. Part 1 introduces the singularity hypothesis. Part 2 and Part 3 together give five preliminary reasons for doubt. The next two posts examine defenses of the singularity hypothesis by Dave Chalmers (Part 4) and Nick Bostrom (Part 5). Part 6 draws lessons from this discussion. 2. Harms: Existential risk mitigation efforts have important benefits but also identifiable harms. This series discusses some of the most important harms of existential risk mitigation efforts. Part 1 discus
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
THL UK protestors at the Royal Courts of Justice, Oct 2024. Credit: SammiVegan.  Four years of work has led to his moment. When we started this, we knew it would be big. A battle of David versus Goliath as we took the Government to court. But we also knew that it was the right thing to do, to fight for the millions of Frankenchickens that were suffering because of the way that they had been bred. And on Friday 13th December, we got the result we had been nervously waiting for. Represented by Advocates for Animals, four years ago we started the process to take the Government to court, arguing that fast-growing chicken breeds, known as Frankenchickens, are illegal under current animal welfare laws. After a loss, and an appeal, in October 2024 we entered the courts once more. And the judgment is now in on one of the most important legal cases for animals in history. The judges have ruled in favour on our main argument - that the law says that animals should not be kept in the UK if it means they will suffer because of how they have been bred. This is a huge moment for animals in the UK. A billion Frankenchickens are raised with suffering coded into their DNA each year. They are bred to grow too big, too fast, to make the most profit possible. In light of this ruling, we believe that farmers are breaking the law if they continue to keep these chickens. However, Defra, the Government department responsible for farming, has been let off the hook on a technicality. Because Defra has been silent on fast-growing breeds of chicken, the judges found they had no concrete policy that they could rule against. This means that our case has been dismissed and the judges have not ordered Defra to act. It is clear: by not addressing this major animal welfare crisis, Defra has failed billions of animals - and the farming community. This must change. While this ruling has failed to force the Government to act, it has confirmed our view that farmers are acting criminally by using