I haven't tried to. any section answering my question? (or) are you implying we shouldn't care about reducing the food supply in the oceans given the amount of alternatives we have?
Some information I found
Could the oceans feed us?
If you looked at the amount of fish that we currently eat, it’s just a tiny fraction of the human diet. You can expand that much more without wiping out all the fisheries. If you have significant climate change, that will result in more upwelling [seawater rise from the depth of the ocean to the surface], which will be like fertilizing the ocean surface, and you get more fish. Similarly we can purposely fertilize the ocean in order to get more fish. So then we have enough fish to feed everyone. How do you catch it all?
Then we started to look into how many ships exist—and if we converted all of them to fishing vessels, would that be enough in order to get enough fish harvested to meet demand? It turned out you end up with problems such as round trip distance. You can’t have little fishing boats go out and fish and then drive all the way back. The solution to that is ship-to-ship transfers of fish, which luckily, they already do now. So our fish solution is actually one of the better ones under certain circumstances. [But] it won’t work for everything. You still need some light.
I just found this survey https://www.wearedonorconceived.com/uncategorized/we-are-donor-conceived-2018-survey-results/ thanks to your comment. thank you!
Alignment Newsletter Podcast: http://alignment-newsletter.libsyn.com/
Researchy Projects for Aspiring EAs - a guide by Edo: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QO6d6mL5ZRJFqmrcIKmSxhPaQHUkYGXB06phHfkNUYI/edit#heading=h.k8xuawhn91w
external backlink: https://www.facebook.com/groups/canadaeffectivealtruism/permalink/2653695294666565/
x-post with https://causeprioritization.org/Democracy (see wiki for latest version)
Epistemic status: intuition; tentative | Quality: quick write-up | Created: 2019-12-05 | Acknowledgement: Nicolas Lacombe for discussions on tracking political promises
Assumption: more democracy is valuable; related: The rules for rulers, 10% Less Democracy
Tracking political promises
Polimeter is a platform that allows to track how well politicians keep their promises. This likely increases the incentive for politicians to be honest. This is useful because if citizens don’t know how their vote will translate in policies, it’s harder for them to vote meaningfully. Plus, citizens are likely to prefer more honest politicians all else equal. The platform allows to create new trackers as well as contributing to existing ones.
The Center for Election Science is working to implement an approval voting mechanism in more jurisdictions in the US. They work with volunteers with various expertise; see: https://www.electionscience.org/take-action/volunteer/.
National Popular Vote Interstate Compact
National Popular Vote is promoting the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact which aims to make the electoral vote reflect the popular vote. They are looking for volunteers; see https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/volunteer.
I added this to my list of lists of open problems in AI safety: https://bit.ly/AISafetyOpenProblems
This brought be to tears. So smart and compassionate <3 <3 <3
The Global Challenges Foundation ( https://globalchallenges.org/ ) has a lot of information really relevant for EAs. They care about improving cooperation among countries to reduce global catastrophic risks. I strongly recommend adding them in those updates. They have a newsletter.