Hide table of contents

Key Information

  • High school students (or equivalent), anywhere in the world are invited to enter the Pivotal Essay Contest.
  • Students will write between 1,000 and 2000 words on one of three questions relating to future generations, AI policy, and ethics for a $25,000 prize pool. 
  • Submissions are open until 10 October 2023 in your local timezone.
  • Students can enter the contest here.
  • See why and how you can increase the contest's impact 

Why hold an essay contest?

Many of the best high school students look for ways to excel outside of the classroom. Every year, tens of thousands of students enter essay contests, yet many existing ones focus only on synthesizing existing fields and improving academic writing. While these are important, we created the Pivotal Essay Contest for students to engage with new ideas, think originally and explore deeply — getting them closer to changing the world in the process.

When we surveyed students about the contest details and the size of the prize pool, many students thought of the contest as an educational scholarship. Many students worldwide spend hours writing (personal) essays for such scholarships ("If you were an ice cream flavour, which would you be and why?"). In this framing, Pivotal offers an opportunity for those students to use this time to research impactful and different questions about the future of humanity.

How can you help?

  • Nominate your friend(s), family members or fellow students to give them some of the tools they need to make a lasting positive impact on the world
  • Apply to grade essays if you want to engage with outside perspectives on long-term issues from students everywhere (and earn extra money). We expect that those well-versed in the philosophy of the long-term future, AI safety, or policy will be a particularly good fit — though this opportunity is open to anyone, including students.
  • Share constructive feedback there, through the comments, or by email at feedback@pivotalcontest.org; all are equally fine.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for Open Philanthropy's financial support and Oxford University's Global Priorities Institute for their partnership and collaboration in organizing this contest.

Thanks to the following for their support and guidance: Luke Freeman, Peter McIntyre, Jamie Harris, Neha Singh, and the dozens of people that red-teamed our website and provided valuable feedback.

34

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments7


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

The link to apply to grade essays is broken.

[anonymous]3
1
1

Hey, just fixed it! Thank you.

I still get this: "The private share link you tried to reach is not available. The owner of this base may have unshared or deleted it. Please contact them if you need access."

[anonymous]1
0
0
1

Hey, here's the link that I tested on different browsers and devices before sending, this should work: https://airtable.com/appG3QOmImzUtNsdj/shrAO4MyIDfaoyr5g.

That works!

This sounds like an amazing opportunity for high school students to delve into pressing global issues! Will there be more essay contests like this in the future?

the link for entering the contest doesn't seem to work. I can't access the website too.

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
Garrison
 ·  · 7m read
 · 
This is the full text of a post from "The Obsolete Newsletter," a Substack that I write about the intersection of capitalism, geopolitics, and artificial intelligence. I’m a freelance journalist and the author of a forthcoming book called Obsolete: Power, Profit, and the Race to build Machine Superintelligence. Consider subscribing to stay up to date with my work. Wow. The Wall Street Journal just reported that, "a consortium of investors led by Elon Musk is offering $97.4 billion to buy the nonprofit that controls OpenAI." Technically, they can't actually do that, so I'm going to assume that Musk is trying to buy all of the nonprofit's assets, which include governing control over OpenAI's for-profit, as well as all the profits above the company's profit caps. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman already tweeted, "no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want." (Musk, for his part, replied with just the word: "Swindler.") Even if Altman were willing, it's not clear if this bid could even go through. It can probably best be understood as an attempt to throw a wrench in OpenAI's ongoing plan to restructure fully into a for-profit company. To complete the transition, OpenAI needs to compensate its nonprofit for the fair market value of what it is giving up. In October, The Information reported that OpenAI was planning to give the nonprofit at least 25 percent of the new company, at the time, worth $37.5 billion. But in late January, the Financial Times reported that the nonprofit might only receive around $30 billion, "but a final price is yet to be determined." That's still a lot of money, but many experts I've spoken with think it drastically undervalues what the nonprofit is giving up. Musk has sued to block OpenAI's conversion, arguing that he would be irreparably harmed if it went through. But while Musk's suit seems unlikely to succeed, his latest gambit might significantly drive up the price OpenAI has to pay. (My guess is that Altman will still ma
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
When we built a calculator to help meat-eaters offset the animal welfare impact of their diet through donations (like carbon offsets), we didn't expect it to become one of our most effective tools for engaging new donors. In this post we explain how it works, why it seems particularly promising for increasing support for farmed animal charities, and what you can do to support this work if you think it’s worthwhile. In the comments I’ll also share our answers to some frequently asked questions and concerns some people have when thinking about the idea of an ‘animal welfare offset’. Background FarmKind is a donation platform whose mission is to support the animal movement by raising funds from the general public for some of the most effective charities working to fix factory farming. When we built our platform, we directionally estimated how much a donation to each of our recommended charities helps animals, to show users.  This also made it possible for us to calculate how much someone would need to donate to do as much good for farmed animals as their diet harms them – like carbon offsetting, but for animal welfare. So we built it. What we didn’t expect was how much something we built as a side project would capture peoples’ imaginations!  What it is and what it isn’t What it is:  * An engaging tool for bringing to life the idea that there are still ways to help farmed animals even if you’re unable/unwilling to go vegetarian/vegan. * A way to help people get a rough sense of how much they might want to give to do an amount of good that’s commensurate with the harm to farmed animals caused by their diet What it isn’t:  * A perfectly accurate crystal ball to determine how much a given individual would need to donate to exactly offset their diet. See the caveats here to understand why you shouldn’t take this (or any other charity impact estimate) literally. All models are wrong but some are useful. * A flashy piece of software (yet!). It was built as