Hide table of contents

I am trying to create a list of Effective Altruist organizations that are heavily constrained by funding, and are focused on cause areas that few or no other organizations are working on. Donating to well-funded charities working on well-known causes likely has limited impact per dollar due to diminishing returns. The best organizations to donate to may be organizations that have limited funding, and are working on causes that few or no other organizations are working on. These sorts of organizations and their respective cause areas may have high potential for growth, and donating to these types of organizations may therefore have the most impact per dollar of any charity. Thus, these organizations need to be identified in order to maximize impact. In other words, what cause areas and charities are the most neglected relative to their importance?

There are a number of factors that seem to influence how much funding a charitable organization receives. These include:

  • How old and well-known the organization is. Older organizations have had more time to become more well-known and attract potential donors. New upstart organizations have had less time to do this.
  • Whether the organization is independent or affiliated with an academic institution or some other parent organization
  • The type of cause the organization is working on

The charitable organizations that tend to be the most underfunded relative to their importance tend to work on very obscure and “abstract” causes that few or no other organizations are working on, that involve issues with a heavily far-sighted “big picture” orientation. On the opposite end of the spectrum, the charitable causes that are the most oversaturated tend to be causes that are very concrete, short-termist, well-known, widely discussed, and photogenic, like cancer research, climate change, or the Starving African Children cliché. In the middle of the spectrum, causes that are well-known within the rationalist/EA community but are not well-known outside of it are causes like existential risk, curing aging, and AI alignment. AI alignment has become much more well-known and better funded in recent years, and there are now many organizations focused on AI alignment. Anti-aging research has become increasingly well-funded, with organizations like the SENS Research Organization receiving millions in donations from people like Vitalik Buterin, and Altos Labs being backed by Jeff Bezos.

Independent EA organizations also seem to have consistently less funding compared to EA organizations that are part of larger parent organizations. The Effective Altruism Foundation, for example, has a number of projects focused on neglected longtermist causes, and has millions of dollars worth of funding that it has received through grants. Still, donating to independent EA organizations may have more impact per dollar, since independent organizations have more intellectual freedom and don’t have to deal with the bureaucratic hurdles and pressure to maintain continuity with old research paradigms that other organizations have to deal with.

I am trying to create a list of organizations that:

  • Have received less than $1,000,000 throughout their history
  • Are working on cause areas that few other organizations are working on
  • Are working on cause areas that are important from a longtermist/negative utilitarian perspective

Here are a few organizations I know of that seem to satisfy these criteria:

  • The Center for Reducing Suffering. They are an organization focused on S-risks and cause prioritization. They may have the single highest importance-to-funding ratio of any organization I know of. Brain Tomasik has endorsed the CRS as his top charity recommendation. They were founded in 2020 and are still an early stage organization. They are also not yet a registered UK charity in order to keep administrative effort low. They don’t appear to have specific financial information on their website, but they appear to have received less than $1,000 in bitcoin.
  • The Qualia Research Institute. They are doing research on mathematical formalization of different states of consciousness, and I know of no other organization that is doing the type of research they are doing. As of early 2021, they have received $125k in total, or about $62.5k per year. They also have a detailed plan of what they would do with more funding. Andrew Zuckerman has argued that donating to QRI has a similar risk profile to buying bitcoin in 2010, and that in the best case scenario, donating to QRI has the potential to be 100,000x better than most other things one could do with their money, including donating to other charities.

What other organizations should I add to this list?




New Answer
New Comment

1 Answers sorted by

Did you make any progress with this? I advise a Foundation in the UK and we are interested in identifying similar types of charities there. Perhaps areas like female offenders, excluded pupils, first 1000 days ACE prevention etc.  We also add dimensions like being well led, with high potential to scale impact. Then we would like to collaborate with other funders on the journey to support them. 

Not a reply to your comment, but you might be interested in the foundation program from Charity Entrepreneurship

Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 12:31 AM

Are working on cause areas that are important from a longtermist/negative utilitarian perspective

If you're only looking for organizations that look good from a longtermist negative utilitarian perspective, I would say so in the title, and early in the post. If not, longtermism, NU, CRS and QRI make more sense in an answer (or answers) than in the question itself, to avoid singling them out, which some might interpret as promotional in a way that's not upfront and assume you posted the question just to promote longtermist NU orgs, or these orgs in particular.

What I'm asking is if there are other similar organizations. I doubt QRI and CRS are the only organizations that fit the description of what I'm talking about.

For this forum, I would agree that it seems best to present the original question in maximally neutral terms, and then separately post your own examples as separate answers, so that the answers can get their own votes and/or discussion threads.

Regarding CRS, we are actually in the process of registering in the US, have received more donations, and are open to applicants for remote roles.

Curated and popular this week
Relevant opportunities