Comments
66
TLDR: Everyone’s talking about what the money could do, but few about how to decide where it goes.
This post is part of the new series of articles on cross-cause giving and the new wave of philanthropy. Stay tuned to the EA Forum and our Substack for the latest takes on topics such as giving now vs. later, common pitfalls in cause prioritization, and other crucial considerations from the Cross-Cause Fund (CCF) team...
Do you mean the causal downstream effects of quality of life improvement for the top 80% due to the bottom 20% or something like whether the overall average improvements are actually due to improvements for the bottom 20%?