Effective Altruism Forum
EA Forum

Hide table of contents
by gergo
2 min read 0

37

AI safetyBuilding effective altruismMarketingBuilding the field of AI safetyField-building
Frontpage

TLDR:

Most EA and AI Safety groups don’t do enough marketing, so we would like to change that. See our new website to apply for help (it's free!). 
We are also hiring. (Update: now closed)

Why:

Several people have pointed out in the past on the forum that marketing is underutilized in the EA and AI Safety ecosystem.[1] Since then, two great initiatives sprung up to address this gap. These are User Friendly and Good Impressions. I think they are great, but currently supporting local groups is outside of their scope.[2]

At the beginning of every semester, university groups are hustling to get applicants to their courses, and many city groups as there is a lack of new members joining. For this reason, we think there is a lot of low-hanging fruit that we could pick up by (1) making organisers aware that they can request support for marketing courses and other programs (2) and then setting up paid social media ads for their platforms.

Background of this project

Over the past ~2 years, we had a lot of success for our national group (EA Hungary) with using paid social media ads to attract diverse and talented participants to our courses, at quite a low cost. Since this initial cost-effectiveness analysis, we have been slowly increasing the budget of our campaigns and experimenting with different approaches. In the past months, we have started expanding our scope and supported a few other groups as well, to see how much these results transfer to other countries. Although our data analysis is still in process, the results seem promising so far which is why we are excited to scale the program further and spin out a new organisation focusing on this area.

Apply for support

You can apply for support here (it’s free), and read more about the project on our notion page (which is just an MVP for now).

Working with us just involves 4 easy steps, to minimize the amount of time that is needed on your end.

  1. You share your initial plans in this form (~5 mins).
  2. We will give you some feedback and suggestions via email, and send you a second form to confirm your ads. (~15 minutes).
  3. We will set up the ads for you, and invite you for a ~20-30 min call well we walk you through how the marketing campaign will look like, to finalize everything and make sure you are satisfied with our plans. At the end of the call, we launch the campaign together.
  4. After your program ends, we will follow up with you to get feedback and assess the success of the campaign.

Our team

Gergő Gáspár is co-director for the European Network for AI Safety (ENAIS) and founded EA & AIS Hungary. His background is in psychology and he has 4+ years of experience in community building.

Milán Alexy is the Director for EA Hungary and Head of Operations of AI Safety Hungary. His background is in economics and behavioural science.

The advisor of this project is Marta Krzeminska, a seasoned marketing professional who was previously Head of Marketing for Mindease. 

Merell Lystra is our social media assistant and has been doing the lion’s share of work during the summer. However she is starting a new university program in September, so her involvement will decrease with the project in the coming months.

Conclusion

We are very excited about this project and think that marketing can be a key driver for growing our communities. Consider working with us if you are interested in contributing to this vision!

  1. ^

    Opinion: Digital marketing is under-utilized in EA
    Marketing 101 for EA Organizations
    The cost of (not) taking marketing seriously
    Concerns Regarding EA Marketing

  2. ^

    There were some adjacent projects though, e.g. Good Impressions has done some marketing for Bluedot in the past, and User-friendly helped GWWC with advertising and web traffic. My understanding though is that they are not actively seeking out to support local groups. Good Impression has told us that they would be open to supporting an organisation focusing on this (which is great news for us!).

37

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Mentioned in

More posts like this

Comments


No comments on this post yet.
Be the first to respond.
More from gergo
94
Why experienced professionals fail to land high-impact roles (FBB #5)
gergo
· · 11m read
20
20
49
AIS Netherlands is looking for a Founding Executive Director (EOI form)
7 authors
· · 5m read
4
4
63
Why AI Safety Camp struggles with fundraising (FBB #2)
gergo
· · 8m read
10
10
View more
Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
This work has come out of my Undergraduate dissertation. I haven't shared or discussed these results much before putting this up.  Message me if you'd like the code :) Edit: 16th April. After helpful comments, especially from Geoffrey, I now believe this method only identifies shifts in the happiness scale (not stretches). Have edited to make this clearer. TLDR * Life satisfaction (LS) appears flat over time, despite massive economic growth — the “Easterlin Paradox.” * Some argue that happiness is rising, but we’re reporting it more conservatively — a phenomenon called rescaling. * I test rescaling using long-run German panel data, looking at whether the association between reported happiness and three “get-me-out-of-here” actions (divorce, job resignation, and hospitalisation) changes over time. * If people are getting happier (and rescaling is occuring) the probability of these actions should become less linked to reported LS — but they don’t. * I find little evidence of rescaling. We should probably take self-reported happiness scores at face value. 1. Background: The Happiness Paradox Humans today live longer, richer, and healthier lives in history — yet we seem no seem for it. Self-reported life satisfaction (LS), usually measured on a 0–10 scale, has remained remarkably flatover the last few decades, even in countries like Germany, the UK, China, and India that have experienced huge GDP growth. As Michael Plant has written, the empirical evidence for this is fairly strong. This is the Easterlin Paradox. It is a paradox, because at a point in time, income is strongly linked to happiness, as I've written on the forum before. This should feel uncomfortable for anyone who believes that economic progress should make lives better — including (me) and others in the EA/Progress Studies worlds. Assuming agree on the empirical facts (i.e., self-reported happiness isn't increasing), there are a few potential explanations: * Hedonic adaptation: as life gets
 ·  · 38m read
 · 
In recent months, the CEOs of leading AI companies have grown increasingly confident about rapid progress: * OpenAI's Sam Altman: Shifted from saying in November "the rate of progress continues" to declaring in January "we are now confident we know how to build AGI" * Anthropic's Dario Amodei: Stated in January "I'm more confident than I've ever been that we're close to powerful capabilities... in the next 2-3 years" * Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis: Changed from "as soon as 10 years" in autumn to "probably three to five years away" by January. What explains the shift? Is it just hype? Or could we really have Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)[1] by 2028? In this article, I look at what's driven recent progress, estimate how far those drivers can continue, and explain why they're likely to continue for at least four more years. In particular, while in 2024 progress in LLM chatbots seemed to slow, a new approach started to work: teaching the models to reason using reinforcement learning. In just a year, this let them surpass human PhDs at answering difficult scientific reasoning questions, and achieve expert-level performance on one-hour coding tasks. We don't know how capable AGI will become, but extrapolating the recent rate of progress suggests that, by 2028, we could reach AI models with beyond-human reasoning abilities, expert-level knowledge in every domain, and that can autonomously complete multi-week projects, and progress would likely continue from there.  On this set of software engineering & computer use tasks, in 2020 AI was only able to do tasks that would typically take a human expert a couple of seconds. By 2024, that had risen to almost an hour. If the trend continues, by 2028 it'll reach several weeks.  No longer mere chatbots, these 'agent' models might soon satisfy many people's definitions of AGI — roughly, AI systems that match human performance at most knowledge work (see definition in footnote). This means that, while the compa
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
SUMMARY:  ALLFED is launching an emergency appeal on the EA Forum due to a serious funding shortfall. Without new support, ALLFED will be forced to cut half our budget in the coming months, drastically reducing our capacity to help build global food system resilience for catastrophic scenarios like nuclear winter, a severe pandemic, or infrastructure breakdown. ALLFED is seeking $800,000 over the course of 2025 to sustain its team, continue policy-relevant research, and move forward with pilot projects that could save lives in a catastrophe. As funding priorities shift toward AI safety, we believe resilient food solutions remain a highly cost-effective way to protect the future. If you’re able to support or share this appeal, please visit allfed.info/donate. Donate to ALLFED FULL ARTICLE: I (David Denkenberger) am writing alongside two of my team-mates, as ALLFED’s co-founder, to ask for your support. This is the first time in Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disaster’s (ALLFED’s) 8 year existence that we have reached out on the EA Forum with a direct funding appeal outside of Marginal Funding Week/our annual updates. I am doing so because ALLFED’s funding situation is serious, and because so much of ALLFED’s progress to date has been made possible through the support, feedback, and collaboration of the EA community.  Read our funding appeal At ALLFED, we are deeply grateful to all our supporters, including the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which has provided the majority of our funding for years. At the end of 2024, we learned we would be receiving far less support than expected due to a shift in SFF’s strategic priorities toward AI safety. Without additional funding, ALLFED will need to shrink. I believe the marginal cost effectiveness for improving the future and saving lives of resilience is competitive with AI Safety, even if timelines are short, because of potential AI-induced catastrophes. That is why we are asking people to donate to this emergency appeal
Recent opportunities in AI safety
6
Funding and job opportunities, events, and thoughts on professionals (Fieldbuilders newsletter #8)
gergo
· · 3m read
0
0
9
An International Collaborative Hub for Advancing AI Safety Research
Cody Albert
· · 6m read
0
0
16
Call for Hackathon Participants: Building AI Tools for Animal Advocacy
Sam Tucker-Davis
· · 1m read
0
0
View more